News
Tesla battery production to increase with new $100m Panasonic investment
Tesla has received a $100 million investment from Panasonic to increase battery production at the automaker’s Gigafactory 1 manufacturing facility in Sparks, Nevada.
The Gigafactory 1 battery plant, often referred to as Giga Nevada, will increase by one production line to 14 total lines because of the investment. It will increase production capacity by 10% and will bring Giga Nevada’s production rate to 39 gigawatt-hours per year.
Panasonic President Kazuhiro Tsuga stated in May 2019 that Giga Nevada had achieved a theoretical capacity of 35 gigawatt-hours per year, but utilization levels had resulted in 24 gigawatt-hour output.
The expansion will be the first to ever occur at Giga Nevada since it started mass-producing battery cells in January 2017, The Nikkei Asian Review reported. The batteries that are produced at the plant will also increase in storage capacity by 5% starting in September, Panasonic said.
The increase in cell storage capacity contributes to Tesla’s desire to increase its 2710 battery cell density by 20% within the next five years.
In May, Reuters reported that Tesla and Panasonic were in discussions to begin expanding Giga Nevada because of an increase in demand for the automaker’s electric cars.
“We are seeing strong demand from Tesla,” Panasonic Chief Financial Officer Hirokazu Umeda said during an earnings briefing on May 18. “We are in discussions right now.”
Panasonic lost its status as Tesla’s exclusive battery supplier after LG Chem was chosen to manufacture cells for the company’s China-made Model 3 sedan that is produced at Giga Shanghai. Additionally, Panasonic and Tesla ended their partnership at Giga New York, where the company manufactures its solar products.
Tesla has experienced an increase in demand since the beginning of 2020, adding to the company’s ever-growing fleet of sustainable electric vehicles. After the Model 3 made Tesla a mass-market company because of the car’s affordable pricing points, the automaker released a second vehicle, the Model Y, which was also priced for more people to be able to purchase.
Tesla’s increase in battery production has contributed to the drop in pricing for its cars. As cell manufacturing continues to increase, electric vehicles will begin to reach price parity with gas-powered automobiles.
Demand for Tesla’s EVs has led to the company expanding its production facilities to the already functioning Giga Shanghai in China and the under-construction Giga Berlin in Germany. In the United States, Tesla announced during its Q2 Earnings Call that it would be building a new plant in Austin, Texas, which would handle vehicle production for customers in the Eastern half of North America.
With Tesla’s annual production capacity for its vehicles set to exceed 1 million cars in 2021, the capacity for battery production is also likely to increase, according to Panasonic officials.
Tesla will hold a “Battery Day” event on September 22, where it will detail developments and advancements it made in its cells. Rumors have spread that indicate Tesla will unveil a million-mile capable battery, but these rumors are unconfirmed
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
