News
As Tesla rises, Volkswagen's largest shareholders back CEO's controversial EV push
As Tesla continues to rise in Europe with the construction of Giga Berlin and the impending local prduction of the Model Y, Volkswagen’s controlling family issued a rare statement of support for CEO Herbert Diess’ aggressive and somewhat controversial electric car push. In a recent statement to local German media, the Porsche-Piech family stated that they are fully backing the CEO in these trying times, as a painful shift to electric cars may be what is required to keep Volkswagen thriving in the coming EV age.
Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess is a staunch proponent of electric cars, with the company’s first all-electric vehicle, the ID.3, being his personal project. Diess’ dedication for electric cars has earned the respect of Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has expressed his support for the Volkswagen CEO’s efforts in the past. “Herbert Diess is doing more than any big carmaker to go electric. The good of the world should come first. For what it’s worth, he has my support,” Musk wrote.
Unfortunately for Diess, his aggressive push for electrification has faced sharp criticism. These negative sentiments have only become more prominent as Volkswagen’s ID.3 ramp met roadblocks due to the vehicle’s software. Diess has predicted these challenges, stating that Volkswagen’s shift towards electric mobility is “perhaps the most difficult task VW has ever had to face.” Yet with investors reportedly growing restless, it appeared that the Porsches and Piëchs, Volkswagen’s controlling family, have deemed it pertinent to express their stance.
In a statement to the BILD newspaper on Thursday, Supervisory Board member Hans-Michel Piëch stated that he fully supports Diess’ initiatives. “He has our support. He is faced with an enormous task. For this, he needs strength, but also support from everyone in the Group,” he said. Wolfgang Porsche, Piëch’s cousin, echoed his sentiments. “Even if Mr. Diess is criticized from many sides, he would be taking an insane risk: There is no alternative today to the path that he and the Volkswagen Board of Management have taken,” Porsche said.
Apart from openly supporting Diess’ efforts, the VW majority shareholders explained why the company had gone all-in on electric cars. For example, Diess has taken a strong stance against hydrogen, opting instead to focus solely on electric vehicles. According to Piëch, this is a decision that he and his cousin fully support. “The discussion about a decision for hydrogen or batteries alone is unfortunate. Hydrogen is too expensive for the foreseeable future and simply cannot be produced with sustainable energy,” he said.
Wolfgang Porsche, for his part, has stated that an intense focus on developing next-generation automotive solutions is needed to survive and thrive in the car industry of the future. Seemingly addressing Volkswagen’s current issues with the ID.3’s software, Porsche stated that it is better to tackle the growing pains of electrification now, instead of potentially facing a real risk in the future. “In the future, digitization and software will determine the car. You have to know: If we don’t tackle this transformation now, the company will have a huge problem in the future,” Porsche said.
The coming years will likely be historic for the automotive industry as a whole. Young carmakers such as Tesla have established a hold in the mainstream market, with vehicles such as the Model 3 becoming a viable and even preferable alternative to conventional best-sellers like the BMW M3. With legacy carmakers now realizing the value of electric cars and the importance of battery tech and software, it is in the best interest of Volkswagen to ensure that it invests in the future today. For now, this would likely result in several painful transitions. But if Diess, Piëch, and Porsche’s statements are any indication, it appears that Volkswagen will be willing to take some heavy blows if it means securing a future where the company is still relevant and competitive.
H/T Alex Voigt.
Tesla is backtracking on a strange adjustment it made to its in-car Navigation feature after numerous complaints from owners convinced the company to make a change.
Tesla’s in-car Navigation is catered to its vehicles, as it routes Supercharging stops and preps your vehicle for charging with preconditioning. It is also very intuitive, and features other things like weather radar and a detailed map outlining points of interest.
However, a recent change to the Navigation by Tesla did not go unnoticed, and owners were really upset about it.
For trips that required multiple Supercharger stops, Tesla decided to implement a naming change, which did not show the city or state of each charging stop. Instead, it just showed the business where the Supercharger was located, giving many owners an unwelcome surprise.
However, Tesla’s Director of Supercharging, Max de Zegher, admitted the update was a “big mistake on our end,” and made a change that rolled out within 24 hours:
The naming change should have happened at once, instead of in 2 sequential steps. That was a big miss on our end. We do listen to the community and we do course-correct fast. The accelerated fix rolled out last night. The Tesla App is updated and most in-car touchscreens should…
— Max (@MdeZegher) November 20, 2025
The lack of a name for the city where a Supercharging stop would be made caused some confusion for owners in the short term. Some drivers argued that it was more difficult to make stops at some familiar locations that were special to them. Others were not too keen on not knowing where they were going to be along their trip.
Tesla was quick to scramble to resolve this issue, and it did a great job of rolling it out in an expedited manner, as de Zegher said that most in-car touch screens would notice the fix within one day of the change being rolled out.
Additionally, there will be even more improvements in December, as Tesla plans to show the common name/amenity below the site name as well, which will give people a better idea of what to expect when they arrive at a Supercharger.
News
Dutch regulator RDW confirms Tesla FSD February 2026 target
The regulator emphasized that safety, not public pressure, will decide whether FSD receives authorization for use in Europe.
The Dutch vehicle authority RDW responded to Tesla’s recent updates about its efforts to bring Full Self-Driving (Supervised) in Europe, confirming that February 2026 remains the target month for Tesla to demonstrate regulatory compliance.
While acknowledging the tentative schedule with Tesla, the regulator emphasized that safety, not public pressure, will decide whether FSD receives authorization for use in Europe.
RDW confirms 2026 target, warns Feb 2026 timeline is not guaranteed
In its response, which was posted on its official website, the RDW clarified that it does not disclose details about ongoing manufacturer applications due to competitive sensitivity. However, the agency confirmed that both parties have agreed on a February 2026 window during which Tesla is expected to show that FSD (Supervised) can meet required safety and compliance standards. Whether Tesla can satisfy those conditions within the timeline “remains to be seen,” RDW added.
RDW also directly addressed Tesla’s social media request encouraging drivers to contact the regulator to express support. While thanking those who already reached out, RDW asked the public to stop contacting them, noting these messages burden customer-service resources and have no influence on the approval process.
“In the message on X, Tesla calls on Tesla drivers to thank the RDW and to express their enthusiasm about this planning to us by contacting us. We thank everyone who has already done so, and would like to ask everyone not to contact us about this. It takes up unnecessary time for our customer service. Moreover, this will have no influence on whether or not the planning is met,” the RDW wrote.
The RDW shares insights on EU approval requirements
The RDW further outlined how new technology enters the European market when no existing legislation directly covers it. Under EU Regulation 2018/858, a manufacturer may seek an exemption for unregulated features such as advanced driver assistance systems. The process requires a Member State, in this case the Netherlands, to submit a formal request to the European Commission on the manufacturer’s behalf.
Approval then moves to a committee vote. A majority in favor would grant EU-wide authorization, allowing the technology across all Member States. If the vote fails, the exemption is valid only within the Netherlands, and individual countries must decide whether to accept it independently.
Before any exemption request can be filed, Tesla must complete a comprehensive type-approval process with the RDW, including controlled on-road testing. Provided that FSD Supervised passes these regulatory evaluations, the exemption could be submitted for broader EU consideration.
News
Tesla says Europe could finally get FSD in 2026, and Dutch regulator RDW is key
As per Tesla, a Dutch regulatory exemption targeted for February 2026 could very well be the key gateway for a Europe-wide rollout of FSD.
Tesla has shared its most detailed timeline yet for bringing Full Self-Driving (Supervised) to Europe. The electric vehicle maker posted its update through the official X account of Tesla Europe & Middle East.
As per Tesla, a Dutch regulatory exemption targeted for February 2026 could very well be the key gateway for a Europe-wide rollout of FSD.
Tesla pushes for EU approval
Tesla stated that it has spent more than 12 months working directly with European authorities and delivering FSD demonstrations to regulators in several EU member state. Tesla highlighted a number of its efforts for FSD’s release in Europe, such as safety documentation for FSD, which is now included in its latest public Safety Report, and over 1 million kilometers of internal testing conducted on EU roads across 17 countries.
To unlock approval, Tesla is relying on the Netherlands’ approval authority RDW. The process requires proving compliance with UN-R-171 for driver-assist systems while also filing Article 39 exemptions for behaviors that remain unregulated in Europe, such as hands-off system-initiated lane changes and Level 2 operation on roads that are not fully covered by current rules. Tesla argued that these functions cannot be retrofitted or adjusted into existing frameworks without compromising safety and performance.
“Some of these regulations are outdated and rules-based, which makes FSD illegal in its current form. Changing FSD to be compliant with these rules would make it unsafe and unusable in many cases. While we have changed FSD to be maximally compliant where it is logical and reasonable, we won’t sacrifice the safety of a proven system or materially deteriorate customer usability,” Tesla wrote in its post.
Tesla targets February 2026 approval
According to Tesla, real-world safety data alone has not been considered sufficient by EU regulators, prompting the company to gather evidence to get exemptions on a specific rule-by-rule basis. RDW has reportedly committed to issuing a Netherlands National approval in February 2026, which could pave the way for other EU countries to recognize the exemption and possibly authorize local deployment of FSD.
“Currently, RDW has committed to granting Netherlands National approval in February 2026. Please contact them via link below to express your excitement & thank them for making this happen as soon as possible. Upon NL National approval, other EU countries can immediately recognize the exemption and also allow rollout within their country. Then we will bring it to a TCMV vote for official EU-wide approval. We’re excited to bring FSD to our owners in Europe soon!” Tesla wrote in its post.
Tesla backtracks on strange Nav feature after numerous complaints
Dutch regulator RDW confirms Tesla FSD February 2026 target
