Lifestyle
Should I Buy the Tesla Extended Service Agreement?
Tesla’s basic warranty for the Model S covers 50,000 miles or 4 years, whichever comes first. Once that point is reached, you have 30 days to decide on whether you want to further extend warranty and sign up for the Tesla Extended Service Agreement (ESA).
With 48,000 miles under my belt and averaging 3,000 miles per month, I’m faced with the tough decision – to ESA, or not ESA, that is the question. I’ll describe my thoughts on Tesla’s ESA (as it relates to me), but ultimately you’ll want to make your own decision on what’s best for you.
Tesla Extended Service Agreement (ESA)
First it’s good to understand how Tesla describes its extended warranty program. According to Tesla,
“Tesla’s extended service program covers the repair or replacement of Model S parts due to defects in materials or workmanship provided by Tesla. Coverage lasts for four years or 50,000 miles (whichever comes first) and begins on the date your warranty expires, as long as you purchase this service within 30 days of your warranty’s expiration.”
There are really two main points to the statement:
- The duration for the additional coverage + timeframe for signing up
- Tesla ESA covers defects in materials or workmanship on parts by Tesla
Exclusions
As with most warranties, wear and tear is not covered by the extended service. Even a Model S with its limited number of moving parts, it still has every day items such as tires, shocks, door seals, fluids, 12V battery, brake pads/parts, filters, etc. that would wear over time, and thus require maintenance.
A key point to note when thinking about the ESA is that your Tesla is already covered for 8 years, and infinite miles, on the main battery and motor(s). Having an extended warranty to cover these items won’t matter.
Cost for Extending Warranty

The extended warranty costs $4,000 which is on par with the price charged by other premium car manufacturers. However, what’s different about Tesla’s ESA program is the additional $200 deductible.
While you will only have to pay for it once for the part being replaced, even if the same part were to fail multiple times, you have to keep in mind that the $200 is charged per part. For example, should a single Model S door handle fail, the deductible would be $200. However, in the unfortunate event that all four door handles fail, you might be shelling out an $800 deductible. (someone please confirm in the comments below)
The extended warranty can be transferred to a new owner for a $100 fee, but it cannot be transferred to a car dealer or third party reseller.
Grey Area with Coverage
The Tesla Extended Service Agreement states:
“Tampering with the Vehicle and its systems, including installation of non-Tesla accessories or parts or their installation, or any damage directly or indirectly caused by, due to or resulting from the installation or use of non-Tesla parts or accessories;”
Does this apply to Model S owners who have upgraded with aftermarket lighting accessories such as the popular “Lighted T” or even a dash cam?
Another passage on regular maintenance is a bit fuzzy to me. According to the ESA,
“If requested, proof of required service, including receipts showing date and mileage of the Vehicle at the time of service, must be presented before any repairs under this Vehicle ESA commence. Service within 1,000 miles and/or 30 days of Tesla’s recommended intervals shall be considered compliant with the terms of this Vehicle ESA.”
Tesla has been all over the place on what it recommends for its maintenance intervals. The official paperwork indicates annual maintenance is every 12,500 miles or 12 months, whichever comes first, although, depending on which Tesla Service Center you speak with, you may hear a different account on what the service interval should be.
My personal belief is that Tesla just intends owners to have an annual service regardless of mileage (and that’s the plan I’ve been following as suggested by my service center), but this frequency for maintenance technically wouldn’t meet Tesla’s requirement for extended warranty, especially given the number of miles I put on per year. I drive a lot, but I doubt I top those that embark on epic cross-country road trips in the Model S.
How Much Value Can I Get?
As with all insurance, trying to derive value from the plan really comes down to a “bet” on whether you think you might need coverage, and also whether coverage on the parts + labor would exceed the cost of the coverage itself.
Averaging 32,000 miles of driving per year, Tesla’s extended warranty will last me a whopping 18 months. It costs $4,000 which backs out to $222/month over 18 months, plus a $200 per item deductible.
I used my historical Model S service records as a sample to see what could potentially be covered down the road with the ESA. I should note that other than the annual service cost of $600 which I’ve already paid, I’ve spent $0 for service so far.
- 12V battery failure (7 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- 17″ screen reacting to static electricity (missing MCU ground) (7 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Sunroof rattle on back roads (shims added) (7 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- UMC failure (8 months) (may be covered by extended warranty)
- Front right tire rubbing wheel well (11 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Bad ball joint (11 months) (would be covered by extended warranty)
- Leaky sunroof seal (12 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Charge port rings discolored (12 months) (would be covered by extended warranty)
- Key fob falling apart (13 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Drive unit failure (15 months) (covered by infinite mile drive unit warranty)
Based on the above I would have had 2 or 3 of the 10 total issues that would have been covered by the extended warranty. One was purely cosmetic (charge port rings). The other two were not. A new UMC is $600, so paying $4,000 for warranty coverage for it makes no sense let alone it’s not clear if the UMC is even covered. The bad ball joint is really the only thing of significant value that would have been covered and I find it difficult to believe that it would cost more than $4,000 plus the $200 deductible to replace.
Based on my own history with needing repairs, it doesn’t seem to make sense for me to purchase the extended warranty. However there are big ticket items that could potentially go wrong and make the extended warranty bring tremendous value. Unfortunate (but rare) occurrences of Model S defects / failures as follows:
- The 17″ screen could develop bubbles (est. $2,900)
- The main control unit (MCU) could fail (est. $6,000)
I rarely hear about a Model S needing big repairs which I hope is a testament to how durable the vehicle is, or it could mean Tesla is covering it on their own through more discreet service bulletins. I started a discussion/poll over on TMC to see how many owners actually had to pay for their service.
Summary
What am I going to do? My high mileage driving greatly reduces any value for purchasing Tesla’s Extended Service Agreement.
Based on the data I’ve collected over the last 18 months and 50,000 miles of driving, the lack of having any major services leads me to believe that having a Tesla ESA is not a good investment for me.
Now, should I put my money aside for a just-in-case type of repair? Probably. But, let’s be real. The lack of servicing is truly a testament to how amazing the Tesla Model S is. No parts to worry about, no major issues, and no out-of-pocket surprises.
My plan is to take the $4,000 I had set aside for the extended warranty and put it in Tesla stock ($TSLA). I believe in the company, love the car, and I think it’s a far better investment than the Extended Service Agreement would be.
Elon Musk
How to use Grok Bot to block spam calls and texts
Musk told users to ask Grok Bot to scrub their phone numbers from spam lists.
Elon Musk has a new use case for Grok Bot, and it is the spam call. On Thursday he replied to an X user named Arash with a short instruction: “Ask your @Grok @Bot to remove your phone number from spam call & text lists!” Arash had said he got tired of the calls, had an AI bot find his number on listing sites and file removal requests, and packaged the process as a free skill for others.
The skill is called Spam-Call Scrubber, which is described to find a phone number on people search sites and data brokers, submits the opt outs, completes the confirmation emails those sites send back, and rechecks on a schedule the user picks. Using it requires the Grok Bot app. The pitch is time saved, since most broker opt outs sit behind separate forms on separate sites.
Ask your @Grok @Bot to remove your phone number from spam call & text lists!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 15, 2026
Musk said Grok Bot now gives each bot its own email address, and that it can detect scam emails. On Thursday he also said SpaceX would make users whole if the bot botches a purchase or leaks a card, then told users to shop away from Amazon after the retailer blocked the agent, as Teslarati reported. The terms of service we reviewed at the time put responsibility for what an agent does on the user.
For Tesla owners, Grok Bot is not just a phone app. Tesla brought Grok Bot into its vehicles on September 22, and we argued earlier this week that the Cybercab’s real advantage may be the errands it runs during a ride. Every Cybercab and the rest of the Model Y Robotaxi fleet has it enabled. The more routine tasks like this one become, the more a rider has reason to hand over something personal in the back seat.
The new Spam-Call Scrubber skill can be downloaded for free and works on sites that honor removal requests, while noting that listings can reappear, and illegal robocallers do not check any registry. Whether Spam-Call Scrubber cuts anyone’s call volume is something the first wave of users will find out, and Musk’s endorsement guarantees that wave is coming.
Lifestyle
Tesla Cybercab and Robotaxi’s real advantage won’t be the ride service
For a century, the car has asked the same thing of its owner, which is basically to pay attention. Even the best ride-hailing app like Uber or Lyft only moved the problem into someone else’s hands. You stopped driving, but you still sat in a stranger’s car, while half listening, and wondering whether to take a phone call in the car without being rude. The Cybercab has no wheel, no pedals and no driver. With Grok @bot now live inside it, it becomes something else entirely, and I think that matters more than the fleet count that everyone is tracking.
Grok @bot is an agent, not a voice assistant. A rider signs in once, and from then on can say what they need and watch it happen. Order dinner from a favorite restaurant. Fill the grocery cart. Move money, answer email, adjust a calendar, push a work project forward. Tesla engineer Yun-Ta Tsai confirmed it is enabled across every Cybercab and the rest of the Model Y fleet, and Tesla’s own pitch is that Full Self-Driving handles the commute while Grok handles the errands.
Think about what that does to a thirty minute ride. Uber sells you a trip, while Waymo sells you the same trip in a more private setting. Tesla is selling the thirty minutes themselves, returned to you with an assistant attached. Errands that used to eat a Saturday get done between pickup and drop off. The ride stops being dead time between two places and becomes a place of its own.
Tesla integrates Grok Bot into its vehicles for the ultimate personal assistant
Best of all, your Bots follow you into any Cybercab, and presumably your own Tesla, then logs you out automatically when you step out. Anyone can bolt a chatbot onto a screen, but much harder to own the vehicle, the autonomy stack and the assistant at once. It also quietly ties SpaceX’s Super Intelligence business to Tesla’s fleet, after Tesla converted its xAI stake into SpaceX equity. The relationship between those two companies is getting harder to describe as separate.
This is also where the hard questions start, because an agent that can spend your money in a vehicle other people also ride in needs some answers. How does it handle a voice it shouldn’t trust? What gets recorded, who can see it, and for how long? What happens when a rider leaves halfway through a task?
If Tesla gets those answers right, the scoreboard changes. We have been counting Cybercabs and wait times. The more telling number may be what riders accomplish per trip. That is data almost no one else will ever have, and it is the real reason to watch Grok @bot.
What do you think? Leave me a comment.
Lifestyle
Tesla’s mirrorless Cybercab will give riders a visibility upgrade
Tesla engineer confirms Cybercab update letting riders pull up rear and repeater cameras on demand.
Tesla is working on a Cybercab update that would let passengers pull up the vehicle’s rear and side cameras on demand, and the request came straight from a rider.
The exchange played out on X late Friday. Cybercab rider Dan Burkland shared photos of the two-seater’s cabin screen after an evening ride, praised the UI team’s work, and left one request: let riders open the rear and repeater cameras whenever they want, “especially for peace of mind.” Tesla UI software engineer Evan (@CarCoder) answered with two words: “In development.”
The Tesla UI team absolutely crushed it with the infotainment software. Nicely done @CarCoder!
One feature request: Allow folks to pull up the rear & repeater cameras on demand. This would be great especially for peace of mind. https://t.co/mNAOSLx6pE
— Dan Burkland (@DBurkland) October 10, 2026
The idea fits a pattern Teslarati has tracked since public rides began. Days after paid Cybercab service opened in Austin, Tesla sent riders a survey that asked them to rate the touchscreen, the app and the cabin, and to pick the features they wanted most. We reported on that survey in September, and a camera view is the kind of small software change Tesla can push quickly if riders keep asking.
It also speaks to something unique about the vehicle. With no steering wheel, no pedals and no driver, passengers have no mirror to check and no way to see behind them. The hardware is clearly built for camera awareness, from the repeater cameras to the rear camera. Letting a passenger look through those same cameras would give a nervous first time rider a way to confirm what is around the car.
The timing matters because the fleet is growing fast. Tesla’s Robotaxi account said on Saturday that more than 300 Cybercabs are now serving Austin, an eightfold increase in 30 days, and Tesla AI chief Ashok Elluswamy named Dallas as the next city. More cars and more cities mean more people riding in a driverless vehicle for the first time, which is exactly when small trust features carry weight.
For now, the feature is confirmed only as in development. If Tesla follows its usual pattern with Cybercab software, riders could see it appear in a point release without any announcement, and Teslarati will watch for it.

