Connect with us

News

Michigan argues Tesla “never sought the ability to directly sell” within state

Published

on

Michigan officials have filed a response to a Tesla federal lawsuit which alleges that the state has unfairly denied the Silicon Valley-based electric car company from selling cars within the state. At issue is a “Anti-Tesla” amendment that prevents the company’s effort to “sell and service its critically-acclaimed, all-electric vehicles at Tesla-owned facilities” in that state.

The state says they have an entirely different interpretation and call Tesla’s version “incorrect.” Michigan requires that vehicles must be sold through a franchised dealer. Today’s state response includes Michigan’s argument that Tesla “has never sought the ability to directly sell its vehicles in Michigan but only licenses to operate dealerships.”

In an email to The Detroit News today, Tesla said, “If it’s the state’s position that Tesla can sell its cars directly to consumers, Tesla welcomes that opportunity and invites the state to work with us so that we can start serving our customers in Michigan as soon as possible.”

Of course, the Big Three automakers — General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US— have their headquarters in the Detroit area.

An October 2014 Michigan state law bans automakers from selling vehicles directly to consumers. The Michigan Legislature, backed by the state’s new-car dealership lobby, voted strongly in favor of the amendment, which has come to be known as the “anti-Tesla” bill. Many believe that the law was intended to close a loophole that Tesla has used in other states to maintain company-owned retail stores and bypass the dealership route. Tesla’s complaint outlines that the “only conceivable reason” for the law is “to reward the dealers’ generous lobbying efforts by handing them a monopoly.”

Tesla seeks two things in its lawsuit. To start, it is asking for a declaratory judgment that Michigan’s ban on direct-sales violates the Due Process, Equal Protection, and Commerce Clauses of the Constitution as applied to Tesla. The law, Tesla says, prohibits it from selling its vehicles directly to consumers, and it also precludes Tesla from performing service and repairs within the State. Moreover, Tesla wants a permanent injunction preventing state officials from enforcing the law, including the October 2014 amendment.

Advertisement

What’s the state’s retort? The state argues a 2000 state law would not have allowed Tesla to sell its vehicles, and Tesla wasn’t incorporated until three years later. “The statutory scheme that plaintiff claims discriminates against plaintiff has existed in its current form since before plaintiff existed as a company,” the state says in its response.

The Michigan Secretary of State’s office had denied Tesla’s new-dealership license request in September. The governor had declared that the law “clarifies and strengthens” an existing long-standing prohibition of new car direct sales in Michigan. Soon after, on September 22, 2016, Tesla filed the lawsuit in federal court in western Michigan against three individuals: Governor Rick Snyder, Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, and Attorney General Bill Schuette. The state contends that none of these individuals has “violated any of plaintiff’s constitutional rights, or any rights whatsoever.”

Earlier this month, Tesla opened a Troy gallery showroom, housed within a Nordstrom department store. With an artistic atmosphere, the 700-square-foot space includes a Model X SUV for consumers to scrutinize. However, no sales can be made at the site. Instead, customers must head online for product details and ordering information.

Governor Snyder commented about the Tesla-Nordstrom gallery with a politician’s finesse. “That’s a legal issue that I’ve said would be a good topic for the Legislature to look at, to say what about new manufacturers and those issues. I would encourage our Legislature to look at (Tesla’s gallery surrogate showroom) when they deem appropriate.”

Tesla is requesting a jury trial.

Advertisement

“Tesla will continue to fight for the rights of Michigan consumers to be able to choose how they buy cars in Michigan. Giving auto dealers a monopoly on car sales benefits them, but harms consumers,” said Tesla in a statement.

Carolyn Fortuna is a writer and researcher with a Ph.D. in education from the University of Rhode Island. She brings a social justice perspective to environmental issues. Please follow me on Twitter and Facebook and Google+

Advertisement
Comments

News

Tesla Model Y L has two distinct features for luxurious comfort

This is not to say the other interior additions are not factors in the Model Y becoming a more luxurious and premium vehicle, but the two mentioned in this article are particularly pertinent in that conversation.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla’s new Model Y L has two distinct features that are geared toward giving occupants a taste of luxury with guaranteed comfort.

These two features should definitely be part of the company’s future lineup, and they could prove to be massive upgrades to the Model Y’s interior, which is certainly premium but is missing some things that truly tailor to a “luxury” feel of an automobile.

This is not to say the other interior additions are not factors in the Model Y becoming a more luxurious and premium vehicle, but the two mentioned in this article are particularly pertinent in that conversation.

Tesla Model Y L might not come to the U.S., and it’s a missed opportunity

Power-Adjustable Thigh Supports

In the front seats of the Model Y L, there are power-adjustable thigh supports that will enable some additional comfort on the legs:

Advertisement

Most might think that these thigh supports are simply a feature that makes the ride more comfortable, which is true. However, they have benefits for the ride and after you exit the car.

Providing proper lift on the legs and thighs can be beneficial for people with back problems or posture issues. The lower back takes an increased amount of stress during long car rides, especially as the legs are fixed in the chosen seating position.

Tesla Model Y L officially launched: price, features, and more

Advertisement

Adding some support to the thighs can help reduce pressure on the lower back and hips, and distribute weight more evenly, taking stress off pressure points.

It can also contribute to better spinal alignment. They also have safety benefits, as some riders could have an improved seatbelt position thanks to the thighs being in this position.

Second-Row Mechanical Armrest

Tesla also added mechanical, one-touch armrests to the Model Y L’s second row, a nice and premium touch for the riders in the middle of the vehicle:

Add the additional space the Model Y L provides to riders, and it already gets more comfortable. However, the addition of the mechanical armrests gives a good option of comfort for those who are seated in the second row.

They can also be retracted with the touch of a button, allowing for those in the third row to exit the vehicle easily.

One con to the mechanical portion of these armrests is that it is another moving part, and, of course, that puts it at risk of having issues.

However, it is certainly more premium than a manual armrest, and the flashy carbuyers will appreciate this small but mighty addition.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Tesla’s NHTSA probe is already on its way to being resolved

The problem the NHTSA had with Tesla’s reporting is already on its way to being resolved, as the agency and the company have been in communication.

Published

on

tesla showroom
Credit: Tesla

Tesla is being probed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for not reporting accidents in a timely manner, the agency said on Thursday.

It is already well on its way to being resolved, the agency said.

The agency’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) identified numerous instances in which Tesla reported crashes that “occurred several months or more before the dates of the reports.”

The Standing General Order in place by the agency requires crash reports to be submitted within five days of Tesla receiving the notice of an accident.

The investigation states Tesla submitted crashes in one of two ways:

Advertisement

“Many of the reports were submitted as part of a single batch, while others were submitted on a rolling basis.”

The problem the NHTSA had with Tesla’s reporting is already on its way to being resolved, as the agency and the company have been in communication.

Tesla has already been in contact with the agency’s ODI and stated that the timing of the reports was an issue with its data collection. The issue has been resolved, Tesla told them.

The NHTSA said the initiation of the probe against Tesla is a “standard process for reviewing compliance with legal requirements, to evaluate the cause of potential delays in reporting, the scope of any such delays, and the mitigations that Tesla has developed to address them.”

It is the latest NHTSA probe into Tesla, as it has also been investigating the company for accidents during Full Self-Driving operation in reduced visibility conditions.

Advertisement

The agency also sought information on the rollout of Robotaxi a few months ago, and how Tesla planned to handle low-visibility conditions in its driverless ride-hailing service.

The NHTSA was interested in knowing how Tesla planned to assess the ability of FSD’s engineering controls, whether any other similar FSD crashes had occurred in low visibility, and if modifications to FSD software would impact its performance in these conditions.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla rolls out minor but significant improvement to Robotaxi service

As per Tesla, Robotaxis will now arrive at their pickup locations with their doors locked.

Published

on

Credit: @AdanGuajardo/X

Tesla has rolled out a minor but significant improvement to its Robotaxi service. The update was shared by the Tesla community on social media platforms such as X. 

New Robotaxi App update

As observed by the electric vehicle community on social media, Tesla has started rolling out the Robotaxi App’s Version 25.8.5 (6074) to users. The update seems to be quite minor, though Tesla mentioned something quite notable the update’s “What to Test” section.

As per Tesla, Robotaxis will now arrive at their pickup locations with their doors locked. Customers would not need to unlock the Robotaxis manually, however, as the vehicles would automatically unlock as they approach the car. “You ride now arrives locked and will automatically unlock as you walk up. Just ensure your app has Bluetooth access enabled,” Tesla wrote.

While this update is minor, it does improve the safety of the vehicles themselves. It also provides another layer of convenience for users of the driverless ride-hailing service. The fact that Tesla is already refining the Robotaxi App’s features this early bodes well for the program. It suggests, if any, that the service will already be fairly refined when it starts being opened to more users.

Robotaxi praised for its safety

Tesla is following a deliberate and cautious rollout strategy for its Robotaxi rollout, though early reviews of the system have been quite positive. Some reviewers have also dubbed Tesla’s Robotaxi service as a safer alternative to more conventional ride-hailing services such as Uber.

Advertisement

This was highlighted by auto reviewer Scotty Reiss in a post on A Girl’s Guide to Cars.

“I like the personal safety factor. No driver to threaten or harass you. You control the locking and unlocking of the car. You can change the pickup location at any time. The car will wait for you. You can call the support desk if you need help. You can change your destination if the drop-off area seems sketchy. All of it together makes me feel safer getting a car home from the airport at midnight or into the city after dark, and I definitely feel safer having my daughters take a self-driving rideshare when they go out to meet friends for dinner,” Reiss wrote in her post.

Continue Reading

Trending