News
Tesla ‘Cyberpunk’ Pickup Truck predictions: Range, towing capacity, and more
Elon Musk’s “Cyberpunk” Tesla Pickup Truck is set to be unveiled this coming November, and the electric vehicle community could not be more excited. Musk, after all, has hyped the vehicle, hinting that it will start at a reasonable price of $49,000 and be the company’s “best product ever.” Tesla has been remarkably good at keeping the truck’s specs secret, which has all but encouraged the EV community to speculate about the upcoming features and specs of the highly-anticipated Tesla Pickup Truck.
Tesla owner-enthusiast Sean Mitchell recently shared his expectations for the upcoming vehicle, and while they are but speculations, they are rooted in information that the electric car maker and CEO Elon Musk have shared in the past. Other speculations are based on Tesla’s current technologies, as well as the company’s recent updates to its operations.
The Tesla Pickup Truck is meant to be a disruptor just like its predecessors like the Model 3 and the Model S. With this in mind, there is a good chance that Tesla will put its best technologies in the vehicle. Mitchell believes that the vehicle will have battery sizes between 150-200 kWh, which should give the truck a range of about 400 miles or more. This is something that Musk himself has mentioned in the past, with the CEO noting that the vehicle will have 400-500 miles of range per charge.
These figures might seem optimistic, but if one were to consider the innovations offered by Maxwell Technologies to Tesla, these specs would be more than plausible. Of course, being a new vehicle, the “Cyberpunk” truck will most definitely be capable of charging at 250 kW using the Supercharger V3 Network. This should allow the upcoming pickup to take advantage of Tesla’s fastest charging solution out of the box.
Since the Tesla Pickup Truck is meant to disrupt, the vehicle will most likely have an industry-leading towing capacity as well. Mitchell estimates that the vehicle will have a 20,000-30,000-lb towing capacity, on account of Elon Musk’s tendency to equip his electric cars with specs that far exceed those of ICE competitors. Seeing as Musk has previously joked that the vehicle could tow 300,000 lbs, a 30,000-lb towing capacity definitely seems feasible.
True to the Tesla brand, the Cybertruck will likely be very powerful as well. The Tesla owner-enthusiast noted that the Silicon Valley-based company will probably leapfrog the competition like Rivian when it comes to acceleration and horsepower; thus, it is possible for the truck to have a sub-3-second 0-60 mph time and about 800-1,000 hp. These specs exceed that of the well-received Rivian R1T all-electric pickup, which will likely beat the Tesla Truck to market.
Mitchell gave an excellent point when it came to the vehicle’s design. During the Tesla Semi’s unveiling, Musk mentioned that the electric car maker is developing a type of Armor Glass that is far more durable and far less prone to breaking. This should enable Tesla to use a generous amount of glass in the Cyberpunk truck’s design, allowing the company to equip the vehicle with a durable panoramic windshield. This does seem to be in line with Musk’s statements about the vehicle being a Blade Runner Cyberpunk truck that looks a bit like an armored personnel carrier from the future.
Watch Sean Mitchell’s recent take on the Tesla Pickup Truck in the video below.
What do you think about these speculations? Are they off base or close? Sound off in the comments below.
Tesla had a petition protesting a recall to fix a potential issue with 2017-2023 Model Y and Model 3 vehicles’ headlights was denied, as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) disagreed with the company’s opinion of things.
The recall covers approximately 19,917 Model Y and Model 3 vehicles built from 2017 to 2023. Tesla initially submitted a noncompliance report for the headlights on these vehicles on March 15, 2024. Tesla then petitioned for an exemption from the fix, which violated FMVSS No. 108 (40 CFR 571.108), arguing that the “noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
🚨 Tesla was denied a petition by the NHTSA to avoid a recall of 19,900 2017-2023 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles.
The NHTSA found that the vehicles’ headlights may exceed maximum lighting levels. Tesla argued it was inconsequential and did not require a recall. pic.twitter.com/m8Jmm1teLL
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 16, 2026
The NHTSA disagreed, stating that Tesla’s conclusion that the headlights do not increase any risk was not an opinion it shared. The agency said it disagreed with Tesla’s assumption that glare is not increased to surrounding traffic. This issue could be highlighted even more in certain weather conditions.
Tesla will be required to remedy the issue, the NHTSA ruled:
“In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Tesla has not met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 108 noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, Tesla’s petition is hereby denied, and Tesla is consequently obligated to provide notification of and free remedy for that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.”
The issue here appears to be the angle of the headlights and the brightness they emit during operation. The NHTSA report states that:
“Tesla’s headlamp supplier, Marelli Automotive Lighting, tested 25 right-hand and 25 left-hand lamps, and for this sample, found the maximum photometric intensity measured in the 10°U to 90°U and 90°L to 90°R zone was between 136.2 cd and 230.1 cd for the right-hand lamps and between 117.5 cd and 160.3 cd for the left-hand lamps. According to Tesla, these tests revealed that the photometric intensity of the right-hand and left-hand headlamp lower beam on the subject vehicles may measure as much as 230.1 cd in the 10°U to 90°U and 90°L to 90°R zone, exceeding the maximum photometric intensity by 105.1 cd. Additionally, Tesla states that a left-hand lamp tested by a Transport Canada recognized laboratory measured a maximum of 171.27 cd in the 10°U to 90°U and 90°L to 90°R zone. Despite these measurements exceeding the allowed photometric maximum of 125 cd, Tesla believes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.”
Tesla also argued at some points that the headlights had not been deemed responsible for any complaints, accidents, or injuries related to the noncompliance.
Lifestyle
NTSB findings on fatal Tesla crash tell a very different story
The NTSB confirmed the driver, not Tesla’s FSD, caused the fatal Texas house crash.
The National Transportation Safety Board released preliminary findings Wednesday confirming that a Tesla driver, not the vehicle’s software, caused a fatal crash in Katy, Texas in June. The driver, 44-year-old Michael Butler, had engaged Full Self-Driving Supervised mode on Rose Hollow Lane, a residential street with a 30 mph speed limit, before manually overriding the system by pressing the accelerator pedal all the way to 100%. Data recovered from the 2025 Tesla Model 3 showed the vehicle was traveling over 70 miles per hour when it struck a home and killed 76-year-old Martha Avila, who was inside. Weather was clear, the road was dry, and it was daylight.
Texas man charged in fatal Tesla crash where he blamed Autopilot
Butler told authorities he had passed out at the wheel. But security camera footage obtained by the NTSB told a different story, and showed the car accelerating through an intersection before leaving the road entirely. Police also found that Butler’s phone had Google searches including the terms “Tesla FSD not aggressive enough 2026” and “Tesla FSD too timid,” raising serious questions about how he was using the system before the crash. Butler has since been charged with manslaughter. The victim’s family has filed a lawsuit against both Butler and Tesla, alleging negligence.
The NTSB findings aligned directly with what Tesla VP of AI Software Ashok Elluswamy had already stated publicly on X in the weeks after the crash, writing that “the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100%.” The data confirmed his account.
Yup. In this case, the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area. They reached a speed of 73 mph during the crash, and had the accelerator pressed even after the crash.
— Ashok Elluswamy (@aelluswamy) June 22, 2026
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Tesla has to fix a big problem with its old headlights, NHTSA says
NTSB findings on fatal Tesla crash tell a very different story
