News
Tesla (Enhanced) Autopilot vs. Full Self-Driving: What’s the difference now?
Tesla has announced a 50% price reduction on Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability for existing Model S, Model X and Model 3 vehicles.
Interested buyers of Tesla’s semi-autonomous feature package can use a new one-click payment process to add Autopilot to an existing vehicle for $2,000 (originally $4,000 when purchased after vehicle delivery) and Full Self-Driving for $2,000, reduced from the original price of $5,000 when added after delivery. The announcement comes a day after Tesla launched its $35,000 Model 3, and drastically reduced the price of its flagship Model S and Model X vehicles.
Tesla explains in a new blog post, “All customers who bought a Tesla before yesterday’s price decrease will be able to buy the Autopilot or Full Self-Driving capability for half of what those features would normally cost after initial purchase.”
Though the announcement is a seemingly welcomed change, the Autopilot update has created some confusion among Tesla owners, prompting CEO Elon Musk to clarify over Twitter.
If you bought enhanced autopilot, FSD upgrade costs $2k instead of $5k
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 2, 2019
Tesla Autopilot
On February 28, 2019, Tesla updated the details for its Autopilot suite that includes the replacement of “Enhanced Autopilot” with “Autopilot”, along with adjustments to pricing and features.
Taking a closer look at the details between Tesla’s original Enhanced Autopilot and what’s now being called Autopilot, and it’s evident that Tesla shifted some of the original features of Enhanced Autopilot to Full Self-Driving. However, Tesla also added two additional features to the Full Self-Driving Capability that will enable the vehicle to recognize and respond to traffic lights and stop signs, and perform automatic driving on city streets.
Autopilot Cost
The cost of Autopilot depends on several factors depending on the date a Model S, Model X or Model 3 was purchased and also if Autopilot was added at the time of vehicle purchase.
- Autopilot – $2,000 (this is the newly introduced 50% discount) when added to a vehicle that was purchased without Enhanced Autopilot. Vehicle must be purchased before February 28, 2019.
- Autopilot – $3,000 when added at the time of vehicle purchase. Vehicle must be purchased on February 28, 2019, or anytime thereafter.
- Autopilot – $4,000 when added to a vehicle after delivery. Vehicle must be purchased on February 28, 2019, or anytime thereafter.
Autopilot Features*
Auto Lane Change- Autosteer
- Traffic-Aware Cruise Control
AutoparkSummonNavigate on Autopilot
* The strikethroughs represents features that were originally part of Enhanced Autopilot but now moved to Full Self-Driving Capability.
Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) Capability, updated February 28, 2019
Autopilot Full Self-Driving Cost
The cost for Tesla’s Full Self-Driving feature also varies depending on the date of vehicle purchase. FSD requires Autopilot.
- FSD – $2,000 (this is the newly introduced 50% discount) when added to any Model S, Model X, or Model 3 that was purchased with Enhanced Autopilot before February 28, 2019. Total cost of EAP ($5,000) + FSD ($2,000) = $7,000.
- FSD – $3,000 when added to any Model S, Model X, or Model 3 that was purchased without Enhanced Autopilot before February 28, 2019. Total cost of AP ($2,000) + FSD ($3,000) = $5,000.
- FSD – $5,000 when added at the time of vehicle purchase on February 28, 2019, or anytime thereafter. Total cost of AP ($3,000) + FSD ($5,000) = $8,000.
- FSD – $7,000 when added to a vehicle that was purchased on February 28, 2019, or anytime thereafter, and already delivered. Total cost of AP ($4,000) + FSD ($7,000) = $11,000.
FSD Features*
- Autopark: both parallel and perpendicular spaces.
- Navigate on Autopilot: automatic driving from highway on-ramp to off-ramp including interchanges and overtaking slower cars.
- (Advanced) Summon: “Your parked car will come find you anywhere in a parking lot. Really.”
- Coming later in 2019: Recognize and respond to traffic lights and stop signs.
- Coming later in 2019: Automatic driving on city streets.
Tesla’s online configurator, March 2019
Tesla explains the recent Autopilot update in its blog post, which we’ve provided below.
Upgrading to Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability
All customers who bought a Tesla before yesterday’s price decrease will be able to buy the Autopilot or Full Self-Driving capability for half of what those features would normally cost after initial purchase.
Autopilot, which enables automatic steering, accelerating and braking, normally costs $4,000 after delivery and Full Self-Driving normally costs $7,000 after delivery. Full Self-Driving capability includes Navigate on Autopilot, Advanced Summon, Auto Lane Change, Autopark and, later this year, will recognize and respond to traffic lights.
Any customer who bought a Tesla prior to this week’s price adjustment will be able to upgrade to Autopilot for $2,000 or Full Self-Driving capability for an additional $3,000. In other words, for a customer who previously hadn’t purchased Autopilot plus Full Self-Driving, they will soon be able to do so for $6,000 less than before. Customers who previously purchased Full Self-Driving will receive an invitation to Tesla’s Early Access Program (EAP). EAP members are invited to experience and provide feedback on new features and functionality before they are rolled out to other customers.
Beginning next month, any existing customer who wants to upgrade to Autopilot or Full Self-Driving capability will be able to do so with a one-click payment. There will be no need to call anyone, and it will be as easy as it was to order your car in the first place.
News
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system has now surpassed 8.4 billion cumulative miles.
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla has long emphasized that large-scale real-world data is central to improving its neural network-based approach to autonomy. Each mile driven with FSD (Supervised) engaged contributes additional edge cases and scenario training for the system.
The milestone also brings Tesla closer to a benchmark previously outlined by CEO Elon Musk. Musk has stated that roughly 10 billion miles of training data may be needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving at scale, citing the “long tail” of rare but complex driving situations that must be learned through experience.
The growth curve of FSD Supervised’s cumulative miles over the past five years has been notable.
As noted in data shared by Tesla watcher Sawyer Merritt, annual FSD (Supervised) miles have increased from roughly 6 million in 2021 to 80 million in 2022, 670 million in 2023, 2.25 billion in 2024, and 4.25 billion in 2025. In just the first 50 days of 2026, Tesla owners logged another 1 billion miles.
At the current pace, the fleet is trending towards hitting about 10 billion FSD Supervised miles this year. The increase has been driven by Tesla’s growing vehicle fleet, periodic free trials, and expanding Robotaxi operations, among others.
With the fleet now past 8.4 billion cumulative miles, Tesla’s supervised system is approaching that threshold, even as regulatory approval for fully unsupervised deployment remains subject to further validation and oversight.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Elon Musk fired back at Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales after the longtime online encyclopedia leader dismissed xAI’s new AI-powered alternative, Grokipedia, as a “ridiculous” idea that is bound to fail.
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Wales made the comments while answering questions about Wikipedia’s neutrality. According to Wales, Wikipedia prides itself on neutrality.
“One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality. A neutral point of view is non-negotiable. It’s in the community, unquestioned… The idea that we’ve become somehow ‘Wokepidea’ is just not true,” Wales said.
When asked about potential competition from Grokipedia, Wales downplayed the situation. “There is no competition. I don’t know if anyone uses Grokipedia. I think it is a ridiculous idea that will never work,” Wales wrote.
After Grokipedia went live, Larry Sanger, also a co-founder of Wikipedia, wrote on X that his initial impression of the AI-powered Wikipedia alternative was “very OK.”
“My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury’s still out as to whether it’s actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say ‘maybe!’” Sanger stated.
Musk responded to Sanger’s assessment by saying it was “accurate.” In a separate post, he added that even in its V0.1 form, Grokipedia was already better than Wikipedia.
During a past appearance on the Tucker Carlson Show, Sanger argued that Wikipedia has drifted from its original vision, citing concerns about how its “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” framework categorizes publications by perceived credibility. As per Sanger, Wikipedia’s “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” list leans heavily left, with conservative publications getting effectively blacklisted in favor of their more liberal counterparts.
As of writing, Grokipedia has reportedly surpassed 80% of English Wikipedia’s article count.
News
Tesla Sweden appeals after grid company refuses to restore existing Supercharger due to union strike
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons.
Tesla Sweden is seeking regulatory intervention after a Swedish power grid company refused to reconnect an already operational Supercharger station in Åre due to ongoing union sympathy actions.
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons. A temporary construction power cabinet supplying the station had fallen over, described by Tesla as occurring “under unclear circumstances.” The power was then cut at the request of Tesla’s installation contractor to allow safe repair work.
While the safety issue was resolved, the station has not been brought back online. Stefan Sedin, CEO of Jämtkraft elnät, told Dagens Arbete (DA) that power will not be restored to the existing Supercharger station as long as the electric vehicle maker’s union issues are ongoing.
“One of our installers noticed that the construction power had been backed up and was on the ground. We asked Tesla to fix the system, and their installation company in turn asked us to cut the power so that they could do the work safely.
“When everything was restored, the question arose: ‘Wait a minute, can we reconnect the station to the electricity grid? Or what does the notice actually say?’ We consulted with our employer organization, who were clear that as long as sympathy measures are in place, we cannot reconnect this facility,” Sedin said.
The union’s sympathy actions, which began in March 2024, apply to work involving “planning, preparation, new connections, grid expansion, service, maintenance and repairs” of Tesla’s charging infrastructure in Sweden.
Tesla Sweden has argued that reconnecting an existing facility is not equivalent to establishing a new grid connection. In a filing to the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate, the company stated that reconnecting the installation “is therefore not covered by the sympathy measures and cannot therefore constitute a reason for not reconnecting the facility to the electricity grid.”
Sedin, for his part, noted that Tesla’s issue with the Supercharger is quite unique. And while Jämtkraft elnät itself has no issue with Tesla, its actions are based on the unions’ sympathy measures against the electric vehicle maker.
“This is absolutely the first time that I have been involved in matters relating to union conflicts or sympathy measures. That is why we have relied entirely on the assessment of our employer organization. This is not something that we have made any decisions about ourselves at all.
“It is not that Jämtkraft elnät has a conflict with Tesla, but our actions are based on these sympathy measures. Should it turn out that we have made an incorrect assessment, we will correct ourselves. It is no more difficult than that for us,” the executive said.
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
