News
Tesla’s new social media manager used a sheep to land the job
Tesla has a new social media manager, and fans of the all-electric car maker were recently privy to the most important, very public part of the position’s hiring process in the form of a Twitter laugh challenge with CEO Elon Musk. Not many job seekers begin their journey to employment this way, but not many people inspire Musk to swap his profile picture for something they’ve posted on the internet, either. The new hire’s name is Adam Koszary, and he starts his new job in July.
If you follow Elon Musk closely on the platform (or are an avid Twitter user in general), you may recognize Koszary’s work as Programme Manager and Digital Lead for The Museum of English Rural Life (The MERL). More specifically, you’ve probably seen an Exmoor Horn aged ram (i.e., a big sheep) show up on your Twitter feed in various meme-type forms if not in its original glory: “look at this absolute unit.”
The phrase “absolute unit” is used online to jokingly refer to anything that’s large in size or stature relevant to its nature.
In April last year, The MERL shared its now-famous sheep photo and caption on Twitter, and the post went viral shortly thereafter. Fast forwarding to this year, MIT’s Technology Review Twitter account used a similar meme strategy to direct attention to an article it published about the first flight of Stratolaunch, the world’s largest aircraft. “Look at the size of this absolute unit,” MIT wrote alongside a link to the piece.
Musk later replied to MIT’s tweet with The MERL’s sheep photo, saying “I’m an absolute unit too.” He then changed his account profile picture and bio to reference the same sheep, and The MERL responded in kind by changing its Twitter photo to an image of Musk. The museum also changed its name to The Muskeum of Elongish Rural Life temporarily. Adam Koszary was apparently behind those clever jokes sent from The MERL’s account, and they’ve now earned him the new job with Tesla.
Providing a source of amusement for Musk isn’t the only hiring qualification Koszary has, of course. His work with the museum’s social media account brought in some serious results in terms of engagement with an online audience. Before the museum’s sheep tweet went viral, its Twitter account had around 9700 followers. Today, that count is up to 133,000.
Tesla and Musk’s position on product advertising is clear – they don’t do it. Keeping that in mind, hiring on a social media manager with a proven track record of audience generation looks to be a smart move for the brand. Also, it’s just fun to see in action. While Koszary’s position is said to start in July, Tesla’s corporate Twitter account has already been warming up its audience for his style of social media engagement.
Earlier this month, the car maker began tweeting with a notable level of wit, sass, humor, and tons of attitude not previously demonstrated. Rather than keeping to its usual professional tone and business-oriented subject matters, tweets and responses were suddenly sharp and sarcastic in ways reminiscent to how Wendy’s Twitter account handles its social media platform. The response to the change from Tesla’s audience was overwhelmingly positive, and by bringing Koszary on board, it looks like the new voice of the company is here to stay.
Koszary’s creds for social media management were further on display in a column he published on Medium last November wherein several points of advice were offered to any institution looking to repeat MERL’s type of success on Twitter or other platforms. “If you want people to have a conversation with you, you’re going to have to have a bit more personality. This doesn’t mean being funny. This means being more relaxed in how you address and discuss things with people so they feel like they’re talking to a real person,” he recommended in the piece. “Social media is social, so be social.”
Overall, if the Twitter affair with Elon Musk was Koszary’s interview for his new position as Tesla’s social media manager, his post on Medium could be considered a type of work sample attached to his resume. All things considered, the parties look like a good matchup for an amusing and engaging ride ahead for everyone.
Elon Musk
ARK’s SpaceX IPO Guide makes a compelling case on why $1.75T may not be the ceiling
ARK Invest breaks down six reasons SpaceX’s $1.75 trillion IPO valuation may be justified.
ARK Invest, which holds SpaceX as its largest Venture Fund position at 17% of net assets, has published a detailed investor guide to why a SpaceX IPO may be grounded in a $1.75 trillion target valuation.
The financial case starts with Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet constellation, which has surpassed 10 million active subscribers globally as of early 2026, with 2026 revenue projected to exceed $20 billion. ARK’s research puts the total satellite connectivity market opportunity at roughly $160 billion annually at scale, and Starlink is adding customers faster than any telecom network in history. That growth alone would justify a substantial valuation.
Additionally, ARK notes that SpaceX has reduced the cost per kilogram to orbit from roughly $15,600 in 2008 to under $1,000 today through reusable Falcon 9 hardware. A fully operational Starship targeting sub-$100 per kilogram would represent a significant cost decline and open markets that do not currently exist. SpaceX executed a staggering 165 missions in 2025 and now accounts for approximately 85% of all global orbital launches. That infrastructure position took decades to build and would be nearly impossible to replicate at comparable cost.
SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise
The February 2026 merger with xAI added a layer to the valuation that straightforward financial models struggle to capture. ARK argues that at sub-$100 launch costs, orbital data centers could deliver compute roughly 25% cheaper than ground-based alternatives, without power grid delays, permitting friction, or land constraints. Musk has stated a goal of deploying 100 gigawatts of AI computing capacity per year from orbit.
The $1.75 trillion figure itself is not a conventional earnings multiple. At roughly 95x trailing revenue, it prices in Starlink’s adoption curve, Starship’s cost trajectory, and the orbital compute thesis together. The public S-1 prospectus, due at least 15 days before the June roadshow, will give investors their first complete look at the financials to test those assumptions. ARK’s position is that the track record earns the benefit of the doubt. Fully reusable rockets were considered unrealistic for years. Starlink was considered financially unviable. Both happened on timelines that surprised skeptics.
Elon Musk
Ford CEO Farley says Tesla is not who to look at for EV expertise
Interestingly, Farley has been one of the most hellbent CEOs in terms of a legacy automaker standpoint to push the EV effort. It did not go according to plan, as Ford took a $19.5 billion charge and retreated from its EV push in late 2025.
Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a recent podcast interview that Tesla is not who Americans should look at to beat Chinese carmakers.
The comments have sparked quite a bit of outrage from Tesla fans on X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk.
Farley said that Chinese automakers are better examples of how to beat competitors. He said (via the Rapid Response Podcast):
“If you’re an American and you want us to beat the Chinese in the car business, you’re all going to want to pay attention, not necessarily to Tesla. Nothing against Tesla—they’ve been doing great—but they really don’t have an updated vehicle. The best in the business for us, cost-wise and competition-wise, supply chain, manufacturing expertise, and the I.P. in the vehicle, was really BYD. In this next cycle of EV customers in the U.S., they want pickups and utilities and all these different body styles. But they want them at $30,000, not $50,000. Like the first inning, they want them affordably.”
Despite Farley’s synopsis, it is worth mentioning that Tesla had the best-selling passenger vehicle in the world last year, and in China in March, as the Model Y continued its global dominance over other vehicles.
Musk responded to Farley’s comments by stating:
“This is before Supervised FSD is approved in China. Limiting factor is production output in Shanghai.”
This is before supervised FSD is approved in China. Limiting factor is production output in Shanghai.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 19, 2026
Interestingly, Farley has been one of the most hellbent CEOs in terms of a legacy automaker standpoint to push the EV effort. It did not go according to plan, as Ford took a $19.5 billion charge and retreated from its EV push in late 2025.
Ford cancels all-electric F-150 Lightning, announces $19.5 billion in charges
Instead, Ford is “doubling down on its affordable” EVs and said it would pivot from its previous plans.
Reaction from Tesla fans was pretty much how you would expect. Many said they have lost a lot of respect for Farley after his comments; others believe he is the last CEO anyone should be taking advice on EVs from.
Nevertheless, Farley’s plans are bold and brash; many consider Tesla the most ideal company to replicate EV efforts from. It will be interesting to see if Ford can rebound from this big adjustment, and hopefully, Farley’s plans to replicate efforts from BYD work out the way he hopes.
Elon Musk
SpaceX wins its first MARS contract but it comes with a catch
NASA awarded SpaceX a $175 million Mars rover contract while the White House proposes cutting the mission.
NASA just signed a $175.7 million contract with SpaceX to launch a Mars rover that the White House is simultaneously trying to defund. The contract, awarded on April 16, 2026, tasks SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy with launching the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Rosalind Franklin rover from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, no earlier than late 2028. It would mark the first time SpaceX has ever sent a payload to Mars.
Under NASA’s Rosalind Franklin Support and Augmentation project, known as ROSA, the agency is providing braking engines for the rover’s descent stage, radioisotope heater units that use decaying plutonium to keep the rover warm on the Martian surface, additional electronics, and a mass spectrometer instrument, as noted by SpaceNews.
Those nuclear heating units are the reason an American rocket was required at all. U.S. export controls on radioisotope technology mean any payload carrying them must launch on a domestic vehicle, which narrowed the field to SpaceX and United Launch Alliance. Falcon Heavy’s pricing made it the practical choice.
SpaceX is quietly becoming the U.S. Military’s only reliable rocket
Falcon Heavy debuted in February 2018 and has 11 launches to its record. The rocket has not flown since October 2024, when it sent NASA’s Europa Clipper toward Jupiter. The three-core design, built from modified Falcon 9 first stages, gives it the lift capacity needed for deep space planetary missions that a single Falcon 9 cannot reach.
The Rosalind Franklin rover has been sitting in storage in Europe for years. It was originally due to launch in 2022 as a joint mission with Russia, but Russia’s invasion of Ukraine ended that partnership, leaving the rover built but stranded without a launch vehicle or landing hardware. NASA stepped back in through a 2024 agreement with ESA to rescue the mission. The rover is designed to drill up to two meters below the Martian surface in search of evidence of past life, a science objective no previous mission has attempted at that depth.
The contradiction at the center of this story is hard to ignore. The White House’s fiscal year 2027 budget proposal included no funding for ROSA and did not mention the mission at all in the detailed congressional justification document released April 3.
Musk has long argued that reaching Mars is not optional. “We don’t want to be one of those single planet species, we want to be a multi-planet species.” Whether this particular mission survives Washington’s budget fight, the Falcon Heavy contract means SpaceX is now formally on record as the rocket that could get humanity’s next Mars science mission off the ground.
The timing of this contract carries extra weight given that SpaceX filed confidentially with the SEC in early April and is targeting an IPO roadshow in the week of June 8. It would be the largest public offering in history.
ARK’s SpaceX IPO Guide makes a compelling case on why $1.75T may not be the ceiling
Ford CEO Farley says Tesla is not who to look at for EV expertise
