The newly appointed CEO of Toyota, Koji Sato, has explained how he plans to change the company’s EV strategy in the coming years. It’s new, yet familiar, as the company will utilize its Lexus brand to push its electrification techniques, but it won’t be an accelerated process.
Toyota has faced considerable criticism for its electrification plan, with most critics believing it to be too slow to be effective. The new Toyota CEO, Koji Sato, is finally looking to address this as he enters the new position in April. According to comments from the upcoming executive to Reuters, Toyota will focus on the electrification of its Lexus brand before moving to broader market consumer offerings.
By electrifying its top-of-the-line brand first, Sato has chosen an EV strategy that, perhaps new to Toyota, is nothing new for the industry. Due to the incredible expense of electrification, legacy automakers have continually chosen to electrify more expensive options first to battle the incredibly high production costs of the first EVs they produce.
Tesla’s first offering was an electrified Lotus sports car that was hardly affordable. Ford’s first EV, the Mustang Mach-E, is considerably more expensive than its equivalent gas models. Even Nissan, who pioneered electrification with the Nissan Leaf, has introduced a higher price SUV to follow suit, the Nissan Ariya.
Sadly, Sato noted that his new electrification plan would not be an all-in rapid electrification. Instead, the company will still leave the door open for other zero-emissions options, such as hydrogen fuel cell technology.
Sato concluded his message to Reuters by noting two final points. First, Toyota would still aim for 3.5 million EVs on the road by 2030. Second, Toyota must focus on better communication regarding its electrification, showing consumers and investors the future of the brand is bright.
It should be noted that the company’s electrification plan remains unchanged until Sato takes his position as CEO at the Japanese auto giant. Further, with likely entrenched support for hybridization and hydrogen technology, Sato may face opposition from executives who don’t believe in a more EV-focused growth plan, even for just the luxury Lexus brand.
Toyota’s original plan to offer roughly 30 all-electric models first ran into problems late last year as Toyota engineers worried that the company would become uncompetitive in the market if it did not begin to offer EVs more quickly, leading to executives pausing the program and re-evaluating the EV strategy. However, it remains unclear what changes were decided upon following the pause.
Lexus’s first EV offering is a variation of the Toyota BZ4X/Subaru Solterra, which has faced numerous recall issues, hence its late introduction. However, in the future, the brand plans to offer more exciting vehicles, including an all-electric coupe based on the well-known Toyota Supra and Lexus LFA models.
For EV enthusiasts, the change in Toyota’s leadership is likely a good sign that the company may head in a new direction regarding its EV transition. However, that process is proving to be iterative, not revolutionary. Hopefully, as the EV market proves to become ever more lucrative, Toyota can choose to electrify more quickly in turn.
What do you think of the article? Do you have any comments, questions, or concerns? Shoot me an email at william@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @WilliamWritin. If you have news tips, email us at tips@teslarati.com!
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
