News
Tesla Cybertruck rides are crucial for Vegas Loop expansion to airport
The Tesla Cybertruck is set to play a critical role in the expansion of the Boring Company’s Vegas Loop, Steve Hill, President and CEO of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, said.
The Vegas Loop is the Boring Company’s underground public transportation solution in Las Vegas, connecting various hot spots around The Strip and offering express rides to visitors and residents for an affordable price.
All the rides are in Tesla vehicles that operate in the loop exclusively and, evenutally, autonomously. But as the Loop continues to expand, more Tesla vehicles, apart from the Model 3 and Model Y that are currently mainstays in the operation, will begin to see an expanded role.
Enter the Tesla Cybertruck.
As The Loop will eventually have a stop at the Harry Reid International Airport, formerly known as McCarran International Airport, there is one thing that comes to mind: luggage. With groups of a few people, the Model 3 and Model Y might not be large enough to accommodate the number of bags that visitors could bring.
Hill believes this is where the Cybertruck could be the answer (via Las Vegas Review-Journal):
“As we look at going to the airport dealing with luggage matters. Cybertrucks are huge inside. They’ve got a great bed, with basically a shutter, that closes over the bed of the truck. So it makes it really easy for families and groups that are traveling together. But because that Cybertruck is available, it just expands the options and makes it much more convenient for those who need that luggage space.”
The Cybertruck is where the airport solution that the Vegas Loop offers becomes a true possibility. The size alone is more ideal for larger groups that will bring bags for an extended trip. While packing bags and splitting vehicles is also an option, some groups may want to stay together, and if the Vegas Loop would only offer separate vehicles, some may opt for Uber or other ride-sharing options.
Cybertruck Size Concerns
The Cybertruck is already a large vehicle, and there is definitely a concern as to whether the Boring Company tunnels would be ideal for the pickup.
CEO Elon Musk even took it through the tunnel on an episode of Jay Leno’s Garage, where he said, “It will be quite interesting to see if we can actually fit it down there.”
It fit, but it was a tight squeeze.
Leno then commented on the ride later during his appearance on Spike Feresten’s podcast.
Musk noted the tunnel that runs under Los Angeles, to which Leno asked if the Cybertruck could go in. Musk said, “Hey, I’ve got an idea. You want to see if we can drive the Cybertruck in the tunnel? I don’t know if it’s going to fit.”
Tesla Cybertruck seen driving in Boring Company’s Las Vegas loop
Leno then said on the podcast:
“We drive the Cybertruck, we barely get it into the tunnel, and now we’re going like 50 or 60 miles per hour through the tunnel with a quarter-inch on each side.”
It is not quite as extreme now. The Cybertruck made its way into the Boring Company tunnel in Las Vegas in January, and it seems to be a much better fit, thanks to its refined dimensions.
Cybertruck sighting in the Vegas Loop ? @boringcompany @cybertruck pic.twitter.com/My5FTYlO4p
— Las Vegas (@Vegas) January 9, 2024
Hill said he is not sure when the Cybertruck would make its way into the Vegas Loop as an operational vehicle, especially considering the airport stop has not been added to the current Loop.
I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at joey@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
Elon Musk
Tesla’s Elon Musk: 10 billion miles needed for safe Unsupervised FSD
As per the CEO, roughly 10 billion miles of training data are required due to reality’s “super long tail of complexity.”
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has provided an updated estimate for the training data needed to achieve truly safe unsupervised Full Self-Driving (FSD).
As per the CEO, roughly 10 billion miles of training data are required due to reality’s “super long tail of complexity.”
10 billion miles of training data
Musk comment came as a reply to Apple and Rivian alum Paul Beisel, who posted an analysis on X about the gap between tech demonstrations and real-world products. In his post, Beisel highlighted Tesla’s data-driven lead in autonomy, and he also argued that it would not be easy for rivals to become a legitimate competitor to FSD quickly.
“The notion that someone can ‘catch up’ to this problem primarily through simulation and limited on-road exposure strikes me as deeply naive. This is not a demo problem. It is a scale, data, and iteration problem— and Tesla is already far, far down that road while others are just getting started,” Beisel wrote.
Musk responded to Beisel’s post, stating that “Roughly 10 billion miles of training data is needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving. Reality has a super long tail of complexity.” This is quite interesting considering that in his Master Plan Part Deux, Elon Musk estimated that worldwide regulatory approval for autonomous driving would require around 6 billion miles.
FSD’s total training miles
As 2025 came to a close, Tesla community members observed that FSD was already nearing 7 billion miles driven, with over 2.5 billion miles being from inner city roads. The 7-billion-mile mark was passed just a few days later. This suggests that Tesla is likely the company today with the most training data for its autonomous driving program.
The difficulties of achieving autonomy were referenced by Elon Musk recently, when he commented on Nvidia’s Alpamayo program. As per Musk, “they will find that it’s easy to get to 99% and then super hard to solve the long tail of the distribution.” These sentiments were echoed by Tesla VP for AI software Ashok Elluswamy, who also noted on X that “the long tail is sooo long, that most people can’t grasp it.”
News
Tesla earns top honors at MotorTrend’s SDV Innovator Awards
MotorTrend’s SDV Awards were presented during CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
Tesla emerged as one of the most recognized automakers at MotorTrend’s 2026 Software-Defined Vehicle (SDV) Innovator Awards.
As could be seen in a press release from the publication, two key Tesla employees were honored for their work on AI, autonomy, and vehicle software. MotorTrend’s SDV Awards were presented during CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
Tesla leaders and engineers recognized
The fourth annual SDV Innovator Awards celebrate pioneers and experts who are pushing the automotive industry deeper into software-driven development. Among the most notable honorees for this year was Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s Vice President of AI Software, who received a Pioneer Award for his role in advancing artificial intelligence and autonomy across the company’s vehicle lineup.
Tesla also secured recognition in the Expert category, with Lawson Fulton, a staff Autopilot machine learning engineer, honored for his contributions to Tesla’s driver-assistance and autonomous systems.
Tesla’s software-first strategy
While automakers like General Motors, Ford, and Rivian also received recognition, Tesla’s multiple awards stood out given the company’s outsized role in popularizing software-defined vehicles over the past decade. From frequent OTA updates to its data-driven approach to autonomy, Tesla has consistently treated vehicles as evolving software platforms rather than static products.
This has made Tesla’s vehicles very unique in their respective sectors, as they are arguably the only cars that objectively get better over time. This is especially true for vehicles that are loaded with the company’s Full Self-Driving system, which are getting progressively more intelligent and autonomous over time. The majority of Tesla’s updates to its vehicles are free as well, which is very much appreciated by customers worldwide.
Elon Musk
Judge clears path for Elon Musk’s OpenAI lawsuit to go before a jury
The decision maintains Musk’s claims that OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit structure violated early assurances made to him as a co-founder.
A U.S. judge has ruled that Elon Musk’s lawsuit accusing OpenAI of abandoning its founding nonprofit mission can proceed to a jury trial.
The decision maintains Musk’s claims that OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit structure violated early assurances made to him as a co-founder. These claims are directly opposed by OpenAI.
Judge says disputed facts warrant a trial
At a hearing in Oakland, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers stated that there was “plenty of evidence” suggesting that OpenAI leaders had promised that the organization’s original nonprofit structure would be maintained. She ruled that those disputed facts should be evaluated by a jury at a trial in March rather than decided by the court at this stage, as noted in a Reuters report.
Musk helped co-found OpenAI in 2015 but left the organization in 2018. In his lawsuit, he argued that he contributed roughly $38 million, or about 60% of OpenAI’s early funding, based on assurances that the company would remain a nonprofit dedicated to the public benefit. He is seeking unspecified monetary damages tied to what he describes as “ill-gotten gains.”
OpenAI, however, has repeatedly rejected Musk’s allegations. The company has stated that Musk’s claims were baseless and part of a pattern of harassment.
Rivalries and Microsoft ties
The case unfolds against the backdrop of intensifying competition in generative artificial intelligence. Musk now runs xAI, whose Grok chatbot competes directly with OpenAI’s flagship ChatGPT. OpenAI has argued that Musk is a frustrated commercial rival who is simply attempting to slow down a market leader.
The lawsuit also names Microsoft as a defendant, citing its multibillion-dollar partnerships with OpenAI. Microsoft has urged the court to dismiss the claims against it, arguing there is no evidence it aided or abetted any alleged misconduct. Lawyers for OpenAI have also pushed for the case to be thrown out, claiming that Musk failed to show sufficient factual basis for claims such as fraud and breach of contract.
Judge Gonzalez Rogers, however, declined to end the case at this stage, noting that a jury would also need to consider whether Musk filed the lawsuit within the applicable statute of limitations. Still, the dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI is now headed for a high-profile jury trial in the coming months.