News
Tesla die-hard Jim Cramer calls J.D. Power quality survey “nonsense”
Well-known Tesla fanatic and investment guru Jim Cramer doesn’t agree with J.D. Power’s recent quality survey that ranked the electric automaker in dead last out of 32 brands.
Earlier this week, American data analytics company J.D. Power released its annual quality survey that found Tesla cars to hold an average of 250 problems per 100 vehicles. The report indicated that this year’s report was Tesla’s first time taking part in the survey and that its cars held a significant number of defects related to build quality.
But Cramer doesn’t buy the report, and he thinks it’s “nonsense.”
Cramer, a Tesla owner and supporter himself, refused to believe that the automaker was plagued with issues related to build quality. As the driver of a Model X SUV, Cramer has consistently stated that the company’s products are fun, reliable, and point to a future of sustainable transportation. But the J.D. Power survey certainly struck a nerve with the former hedge fund manager turned TV personality.
“Tesla’s great,” Cramer stated in a survey with TheStreet. “It’s like Land Rover; people also think Land Rover is bad. I’ve gotta 1994 Range Rover, its unbelievable…it actually goes up in value. I believe Teslas will go up in value, and I think these surveys are stupid.”
Cramer went on to explain the brand loyalty that Tesla has acquired over its 12-year history of cranking out electric cars, claiming that he’s never heard anyone talk negatively about their ownership experience.
“I don’t know a soul who owns a Tesla who actually doesn’t think that it isn’t the greatest thing to ever happen,” Cramer added.
Interestingly enough, Tesla has confronted issues with the build quality of its cars for years, and a Bloomberg survey of 5,000 Model 3 owners performed in October stated problems with the car’s build had gotten noticeably better.
From claims of “soft” and improper paint, body gaps, and poorly installed components, Tesla utilized the information from real owners to improve its vehicles exponentially. Many of the reported quality issues occurred when Tesla was amidst “production hell” for the Model 3, as the company’s Fremont facility was working long and stressful hours in an attempt to ramp the sedan which would infiltrate the mass-market sedan sector.
Improvements were made, and after Consumer Reports slashed the affordable sedan from its recommendation list, CR recommended the Model 3 once again, citing “improved reliability.”
Before taking delivery of a vehicle, owners are encouraged to inspect the car looking for possible issues with panel gaps or other indicators of lackluster build quality. If something is found, the automaker will fix the problem.
Tesla’s most recent release of the Model Y showed that panel gaps had improved compared to the first releases of the Model 3. Automotive veteran Sandy Munro stated in his first episode of the Model Y teardown that, “for an early-stage product, this is pretty good.”
J.D. Power’s survey recognized Dodge as the most reliable brand, but Tesla’s last-place finish in the rankings is controversial. After the Silicon Valley-based automaker has made strides to improve the build quality of its vehicles since hearing complaints, the company’s cars have regained recommendations from former critics.
Elon Musk
Tesla confirmed HW3 can’t do Unsupervised FSD but there’s more to the story
Tesla confirmed HW3 vehicles cannot run unsupervised FSD, replacing its free upgrade promise with a discounted trade-in.
Tesla has officially confirmed that early vehicles with its Autopilot Hardware 3 (HW3) will not be capable of unsupervised Full Self-Driving, while extending a path forward for legacy owners through a discounted trade-in program. The announcement came by way of Elon Musk in today’s Tesla Q1 2026 earnings call.
🚨 Our LIVE updates on the Tesla Earnings Call will take place here in a thread 🧵
Follow along below: pic.twitter.com/hzJeBitzJU
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) April 22, 2026
The history here matters. HW3 launched in April 2019, and Tesla sold Full Self-Driving packages to owners on the understanding that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. Some owners paid between $8,000 and $15,000 for FSD during that period. For years, as FSD’s AI models grew more demanding, HW3 vehicles fell progressively further behind, eventually landing on FSD v12.6 in January 2025 while AI4 vehicles moved to v13 and then v14. When Musk acknowledged in January 2025 that HW3 simply could not reach unsupervised operation, and alluded to a difficult hardware retrofit.
The near-term offering is more concrete. Tesla’s head of Autopilot Ashok Elluswamy confirmed on today’s call that a V14-lite will be coming to HW3 vehicles in late June, bringing all the V14 features currently running on AI4 hardware. That is a meaningful software update for owners who have been frozen at v12.6 for over a year, and it represents genuine effort to keep older hardware relevant. Unsupervised FSD for vehicles is now targeted for Q4 2026 at the earliest, with Musk describing it as a gradual, geography-limited rollout.
For HW3 owners, the over-the-air V14-lite update is welcomed, and the discounted trade-in path at least acknowledges an old obligation. What happens next with the trade-in pricing will define how this chapter ultimately gets written. If Tesla prices the hardware path fairly, acknowledges what early adopters are owed, and delivers V14-lite on the June timeline it committed to today, it has a real opportunity to convert one of the longest-running sore subjects among early adopters into a loyalty story.
Elon Musk
Tesla isn’t joking about building Optimus at an industrial scale: Here we go
Tesla’s Optimus factory in Texas targets 10 million robots yearly, with 5.2 million square feet under construction.
Tesla’s Q1 2026 Update Letter, released today, confirms that first generation Optimus production lines are now well underway at its Fremont, California factory, with a pilot line targeting one million robots per year to start. Of bigger note is a shared aerial image of a large piece of land adjacent to Gigafactory Texas, that Tesla has prominently labeled “Optimus factory site preparation.”
Permit documents show Tesla is seeking to add over 5.2 million square feet of new building space to the Giga Texas North Campus by the end of 2026, at an estimated construction investment of $5 billion to $10 billion. The longer term production target for that facility is 10 million Optimus units per year. Giga Texas already sits on 2,500 acres with over 10 million square feet of existing factory floor, and the North Campus expansion is being built to support multiple projects, including the dedicated Optimus factory, the Terafab chip fabrication facility (a joint Tesla/SpaceX/xAI venture), a Cybercab test track, road infrastructure, and supporting facilities.
Credit: TESLA
Texas makes strategic sense beyond the existing infrastructure. The state’s tax structure, lower labor costs relative to California, and the proximity to Tesla’s AI training cluster Cortex 1 and 2, both located at Giga Texas and now totaling over 230,000 H100 equivalent GPUs, means the Optimus software stack and the factory producing the hardware will share the same campus. Tesla’s Q1 report also confirmed completion of the AI5 chip tape out in April, the inference processor designed specifically to power Optimus units in the field.
As Teslarati reported, the Texas facility is intended to house Optimus V4 production at full scale. Musk told the World Economic Forum in January that Tesla plans to sell Optimus to the public by end of 2027 at a price between $20,000 and $30,000, stating, “I think everyone on earth is going to have one and want one.” He has previously pegged long term demand for general purpose humanoid robots at over 20 billion units globally, citing both consumer and industrial use cases.
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) reported its earnings for the first quarter of 2026 on Wednesday afternoon. Here’s what the company reported compared to what Wall Street analysts expected.
The earnings results come after Tesla reported a miss on vehicle deliveries for the first quarter, delivering 358,023 vehicles and building 408,386 cars during the three-month span.
As Tesla transitions more toward AI and sees itself as less of a car company, expectations for deliveries will begin to become less of a central point in the consensus of how the quarter is perceived.
Nevertheless, Tesla is leaning on its strong foundation as a car company to carry forward its AI ambitions. The first quarter is a good ground layer for the rest of the year.
Tesla Q1 2026 Earnings Results
Tesla’s Earnings Results are as follows:
- Non-GAAP EPS –Â $0.41 Reported vs. $0.36 Expected
- Revenues –Â $22.387 billion vs. $22.35 billion Expected
- Free Cash Flow –Â $1.444 billion
- Profit –Â $4.72 billion
Tesla beat analyst expectations, so it will be interesting to see how the stock responds. IN the past, we’ve seen Tesla beat analyst expectations considerably, followed by a sharp drop in stock price.
On the same token, we’ve seen Tesla miss and the stock price go up the following trading session.
Tesla will hold its Q1 2026 Earnings Call in about 90 minutes at 5:30 p.m. on the East Coast. Remarks will be made by CEO Elon Musk and other executives, who will shed some light on the investor questions that we covered earlier this week.
You can stream it below. Additionally, we will be doing our Live Blog on X and Facebook.
Q1 2026 Earnings Call at 4:30pm CT https://t.co/pkYIaGJ32y
— Tesla (@Tesla) April 22, 2026
Tesla confirmed HW3 can’t do Unsupervised FSD but there’s more to the story
Tesla isn’t joking about building Optimus at an industrial scale: Here we go
