Connect with us

News

Tesla lowers Model S and Model X price, standardizes battery pack strategy

Published

on

Following Tesla’s launch of the highly-anticipated $35,000 Standard Model 3, the electric car maker has implemented price adjustments for its flagship Model S and Model X line. With the recent reductions in place, versions of the Model S and X now cost up to $18,000 less than their previous prices.

Tesla Model S

Tesla’s Model S order page as of March 1, 2019. (Credit: Tesla)

Accessing the order page for the Model S, customers will see that the vehicle is offered in three variants — Standard, Long Range, and Performance. The Standard Range Model S starts at $79,000 and is capable of traveling 270 miles per charge. The vehicle has a 0-60 mph time of 4.2 seconds and a top speed of 140 mph. Despite its range, it should be noted that this Model S variant is equipped with a software-limited battery pack, the capacity of which is yet to be revealed by Tesla.

The Long Range Model S, which costs $83,000 has a range of 335 miles per charge, has a 0-60 mph time of 4.1 seconds and a top speed of 155 mph. This variant, dubbed the “Extended Range Model S” prior to the recent adjustments, started at $93,000. 

Lastly, the Model S Performance has a range of 315 miles per charge, a 0-60 mph time of 3.0 seconds, a top speed of 155 mph, and a starting price of $99,000, a notable reduction over its previous price of $112,000. Customers who prefer to experience the car’s ferocity can add the Ludicrous Mode upgrade for $15,000, which reduces the 0-60 mph time to 2.4 seconds. With the Ludicrous Mode upgrade, the Tesla Model S Performance now starts at $114,000, a whopping $18,000 less than its previous price of $132,000.

Tesla Model X

Tesla’s Model X order page as of March 1, 2019. (Credit: Tesla)

The Tesla Model X does not have a Standard range option. Instead, the all-electric SUV is only offered as a Long Range or a Performance variant. The Long Range Model X, which has a 295-mile range, a top speed of 155 mph, and a 0-60 mph time of 4.7 seconds, currently costs $88,000. This is $8,000 less than its previous price of $96,000.

The Model X Performace, which has 289 miles of range, a top speed of 155 mph, and a 0-60 mph time of 3.5 seconds, starts at $104,000, a full $13,000 less than its previous price of $117,000. With Ludicrous Mode, which lowers the Model X Performance’s 0-60 mph time to just 2.8 seconds, the Model X Performance now starts at $119,000, $18,000 less than its previous price of $137,000.

Tesla’s new pricing strategy is notably aggressive. The Model S and Model X have always been costly vehicles, but after these adjustments, they have become far more attainable for a much larger demographic. Coupled with the release of the $35,000 Model 3, Tesla’s reduced prices for the Model S and X give potential customers an option for practically every price bracket.

Based on a blog post announcing the new Model 3 variants, Tesla explained that it was able to reduce the costs of its vehicles by shifting all of its sales to an online-only model moving forward. This would allow Tesla to sell in every state in the United States, but it will likely result in yet another round of layoffs as the company closes “many” of its stores. Tesla has pledged to significantly increase its service fleet as well, in order to accommodate the influx of vehicles that will be added in the near future.

Advertisement
-

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

Tesla’s secretive “Project Crystal Sun” gets a big green light in Texas

Fort Bend County approved four incentive agreements Thursday for Tesla’s proposed $10.1 billion solar factory.

Published

on

By

Elon Musk stands in profile against a clear blue sky, with a bright overhead sun shining above a vast landscape of Tesla solar panels stretching to the horizon, and a smaller Texas flag flying on a pole to his right.

Fort Bend County commissioners on Thursday approved a package of tax incentives for Tesla’s proposed $10.1 billion solar cell factory near Needville, Texas, giving the company one of the last local approvals it needs before it decides where to build. All four Tesla agreements passed 4 to 0.

The votes covered a property tax abatement inside Reinvestment Zone No. 34, a Chapter 381 economic development agreement, a foreign trade zone non-objection paired with payments in lieu of certain taxes, and a separate payment in lieu of taxes “true up” agreement, according to agenda notes from the Fort Bend Commissioners Court meeting.

The project, known internally as “Project Crystal Sun,” would make solar cells and finished modules on roughly 3,000 acres near FM 762 and FM 1994, south of the Brazos River. As Teslarati reported when the filing first surfaced in August, Tesla’s application under the state’s JETI Act splits the investment into $1.5 billion in real property and $8.6 billion in equipment, with 9,712 permanent jobs projected by 2033 and commercial operations targeted for the first quarter of 2029. The plant would handle the full chain from ingot and wafer production through cell testing.

Inside Tesla’s secretive $10 Billion “Project Crystal Sun” filing

Thursday’s approval does not lock in the site. Tesla has told the Texas Comptroller it is still weighing other locations, and site selection adviser David Dennison told Lamar Consolidated ISD trustees in September that the race had narrowed to Fort Bend and one out of state rival with a “very compelling package,” according to the Houston Chronicle. Tesla hopes to decide before the end of 2026, and the incentives still need sign off from the Comptroller and the Governor’s office.

Local officials have now done nearly everything within their control. Commissioners created the reinvestment zone in an August 24 special meeting, with Interim County Judge Daniel Wong formally withdrawing himself over his engineering firm’s past work with Tesla. Lamar CISD trustees voted 7 to 0 on September 15 to advance a JETI agreement that would tax Tesla’s qualifying property at 50 percent of its value for maintenance and operations from 2029 through 2038.

Advertisement
-

The plant lines up with a target Elon Musk set on Tesla’s Q4 2025 earnings call in January, when he said the company would “work toward getting 100 GW a year of solar cell production, integrating across the entire supply chain from raw materials all the way to finished solar panels.” In March, Tesla was reported to be negotiating a $2.9 billion purchase of Chinese solar manufacturing equipment bound for Texas. The Houston area already hosts Tesla’s Megafactory in Brookshire, where Megapack 3 production has started. Tesla said on its Q3 call that Megapack supply for 2027 is nearly sold out, and Musk wrote on X Thursday that the company is “increasing production of Megapacks as much as possible,” as demand from data centers climbs.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla is building its own maps to fix Navigation issues

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla revealed plans to develop its own maps internally to fix Navigation issues and give owners more control over their routing.

On the company’s Q3 2026 Earnings Call, a question was asked about FSD Navigation issues, particularly speed limit recognition, parking, and routing. These are issues that surface from version to version and seem to be seriously challenging for Tesla’s AI team to resolve.

Tesla’s Head of AI, Ashok Elluswamy, said in response to the question:

“You’re totally right that we shouldn’t be depending on external people’s maps. So we are building our own maps, but not like the same way as OneMoreMap. We are building an entirely new architecture with essentially AI-based mapping and navigation.”

He continued:

“It’s going to be super awesome. It’s going to be integrated with voice. You can talk to it, ask for different routes. It’s going to learn your personalized preferences, plus the fleet preferences. The collective intelligence of all the cars is going to flow into making the maps and navigation super cool.”

Advertisement
-

Elluswamy said this issue should be confronted, and the mapping should be available for people by the time the v15 release starts deploying to customers.

“And over the next several months,” he added, “it’s just going to take over all of the navigation functions, parking, destination handling. And it will know you better than you know yourself in some regard for the driving task, and then handle it fully.”

Tesla Summon got insanely good in FSD v14.3.2 — Navigation? Not so much

Navigation is perhaps the most notable complaint with FSD, and although it has gotten better, it is still flawed. Much of the time, FSD will take people on routes that are not preferred by the driver, but Tesla tried to combat this with a routing feature in the Summer 2026 Update.

Tesla currently relies on Google for map data, but it is sort of counterintuitive to believe the company would rely on a third party for this. These improvements will be welcome, as routing and navigation have been such a pain point for so many owners for so long.

Quotes via Motley Fool

Advertisement
-
Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Tesla buyers are buying for Full Self-Driving and not for the car, data shows

Published

on

(Credit: Tesla)

Tesla Full Self-Driving (Supervised) showed a record attach rate at delivery for new vehicles in the third quarter of 2026.

75 percent of new vehicle deliveries in North America included a subscription to FSD software, up from 55 percent in the prior quarter, a 20-percentage-point sequential gain in the company’s most mature market.

Tesla Q3 2026 Earnings results: in-line revenues, slight beat on EPS

Tesla shed light on the Q3 Shareholder Deck that 75 percent of new deliveries came with an FSD subscription:

“FSD (Supervised)⁴ attach rate continued to grow, reaching over 75% of new vehicle deliveries in North America – our most mature market – a nearly twenty percentage point sequential increase. We believe that FSD is driving demand in markets where it is available, and we continue to work with regulators to get it approved in other markets. “

The higher attach rate accompanied strong growth in the overall FSD consumer base, as active subscriptions rose to 1.75 million, a 67 percent year-over-year increase. For the first time, more than half of paid customers are on the monthly subscription, which is priced at $99 per month in the U.S.

Advertisement
-

The transition to subscriptions has accelerated since Tesla discontinued the one-time purchase option in most markets earlier this year. The recurring model improves revenue visibility and margins compared with large upfront payments. With three-quarters of North American deliveries now including FSD, the software is now an evidently large contributor to Tesla’s economics and ancillary revenue.

Geographic expansion remains important for further gains. FSD is now available in nine countries in the EU, and more than 100,000 customers have driven over 160 million kilometers. Tesla is pursuing broader EU-wide approval, with a related vote expected in December. Similar progress in additional markets could support higher attach rates beyond North America.

These results came as Tesla had a strong quarterly delivery performance of 486,532 vehicles in the quarter, which came with its largest passenger-vehicle backlog in four years. Battery supply continued to limit volume, but the company has pointed to FSD as a clear difference-maker that is helping sustain demand. As supervised capabilities improve, the attach rate will likely continue to improve.

At face value, it is a key measure of how Tesla is converting sales into autonomy progress.

Advertisement
-

Continue Reading