Connect with us

Lifestyle

The EV renaissance is coming with Netherlands and Germany taking stage first

Published

on

Oosterhout Supercharger
Oosterhout Supercharger in the Netherlands

The announcement that the Netherlands and Germany has plans to phase out gas cars and replace it with 100% all-electric vehicles could set a precedence for success or failure for the rest of the world. Many industries, governments, and people will be eagerly watching from the sidelines for indications of what the future may hold.

The intricacies of benefits and challenges are greatly unknown. Even the best analysts won’t be able to forecast the impacts of the shift. There are far too many factors at play. Power generation needs and loads can be anticipated through careful calculation, but social and economic responses are usually less predictable. As the Netherlands takes the stage first, the world will watch an interesting evolution unfold.

Social

The most volatile and powerful force is wilded by the collective people. The social climate of the Netherlands can prime the engine that drives change. If they are a progressive and insightful bunch, they may willingly exceed their governments goals. As a whole, the nation may recognize that early adoption leads to a smooth transition.

However, if the people resist change due to fear and uncertainty, the transition may be a long and bumpy road. They may fight to the bitter end to maintain, import, and even smuggle their fossil fuel vehicles into the future.

Economic

Shifting from internal combustion engine (ICE) cars will revamp the Netherland’s entire economy. In a reversed parallel to the uptake of EVs and their infrastructure, ICE cars will face similar struggle as they phase out. We are all too familiar with the questions “but where do you charge it up? Are there enough charging stations out there?”

Advertisement

The tables are going to turn. Whether by choice or by economic force, petrol stations will begin to shutter and become few and far between. The slowest of the adopters will find it less and less convenient to fuel up their cars. While early EV adopters always had the options to charge at home, a gas equivalent for home fueling seems unlikely.

If gas stations affiliated convenience stores are smart, they will rework their business models to better accommodate EV drivers. In the USA we are already seeing an encouraging trend with companies like Sheetz who have begun to shift from the typical gas station model, and refocus on fast-food, small grocery store, and beverage business. They are installing a few fast-chargers and even in talks to feature Tesla Supercharging stations.

ICE cars are already arguably miserable to maintain and repair. Vehicle service businesses will likely shy away from working on them. Parts will become hard to find. One could argue that there would be a slight uptick in business for ICE repairs centers to accommodate owners who are holding out on purchasing an EV, but will hardly reflect Cuba’s embargo-driven demand for repairs.

The Netherlands already have some forward thinking companies paving the way to EV adoption. Dutch company Fastned is off to a good start and appears to be insightful enough to plan ahead for future growth of its existing fast charging locations. If they are any indication for the country’s willingness to switch to EV’s, the future is very bright.

The global oil industry may not be threatened by losing business in the Netherlands alone, but their national oil industry must be losing their mind. How will they cope? Will they go away completely, or will they somehow adjust their energy focus to renewables in order to save jobs and business?

Advertisement

We should keep an eye on this exciting movement as it unfolds. The Dutch will be doing the entire world a favor. Highlighting success and errors though example is one of the best ways the rest of the world can learn the best way to accommodate the imminent transportation and energy shift.

I have a passion for all that is clean, green, responsible and logical. Because of this, I am a big Tesla enthusiast and future owner.

Advertisement
Comments

Lifestyle

Tesla Model S Plaid battles China’s 1500 hp monster Nurburgring monster, with surprising results

There is just something about Tesla’s tuning and refinement that makes raw specs seem not as game-changing.

Published

on

Credit: Carwow/YouTube

The Tesla Model S Plaid has been around for some time. Today, it is no longer the world’s quickest four-door electric sedan, nor is it the most powerful. As per a recent video from motoring YouTube channel Carwow, however, it seems like the Model S Plaid is still more than a match for some of its newer and more powerful rivals. 

The monster from China

The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is nothing short of a monster. Just like the Model S Plaid, it features three motors. It also has 1,548 hp and 1,770 Nm of torque. It’s All Wheel Drive and weighs a hefty 2,360 kg. The vehicle, which costs just about the equivalent of £55,000, has been recorded setting an insane 7:04.957 at the Nurburgring, surpassing the previous record held by the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT.

For all intents and purposes, the Model S Plaid looked outgunned in Carwow’s test. The Model S Plaid is no slouch with its three motors that produce 1,020 hp and 1,420 Nm of torque. It’s also a bit lighter at 2,190 kg despite its larger size. However, as the Carwow host pointed out, the Model S Plaid holds a 7:25.231 record in the Nurburgring. Compared to the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra’s record, the Model S Plaid’s lap time is notably slower. 

Real-world tests

As could be seen in Carwow’s drag races, however, Tesla’s tech wizardry with the Model S Plaid is still hard to beat. The two vehicles competed in nine races, and the older Model S Plaid actually beat its newer, more powerful counterpart from China several times. At one point in the race, the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra hit its power limit due to its battery’s temperature, but the Model S Plaid was still going strong.

The Model S Plaid was first teased five years ago, in September 2020 during Tesla’s Battery Day. Since then, cars like the Lucid Air Sapphire and the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra have been released, surpassing its specs. But just like the Model Y ended up being the better all-rounder compared to the BYD Sealion 7 and the MG IM6, there is just something about Tesla’s tuning and refinement that makes raw specs seem not as game-changing. 

Advertisement

Check out Carwow’s Model S Plaid vs Xiaomi SU7 drag race video below.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

500-mile test proves why Tesla Model Y still humiliates rivals in Europe

On paper, the BYD Sealion 7 and MG IM6 promised standout capabilities against the Model Y.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla China

BYD is seeing a lot of momentum in Europe, so much so that mainstream media has taken every opportunity to argue that the Chinese automaker has beaten Tesla in the region. But while BYD sales this year in Europe are rising and Tesla’s registrations remain challenged, the raw capabilities of vehicles like the Model Y are difficult to deny. 

This was highlighted in a 500-mile challenge by What Car? magazine, which showed that the new Tesla Model Y is more efficient, cheaper to run, and more reliable than rivals like the BYD Sealion 7, and even the nearly 400 KW-charging MG IM6.

Range and charging promises

On paper, the BYD Sealion 7 and MG IM6 promised standout capabilities against the Model Y. The Sealion 7 had more estimated range and the IM6 promised significantly faster charging. When faced with real-world conditions, however, it was still the Model Y that proved superior.

During the 500-mile test, the BYD nearly failed to reach a charging stop, arriving with less range than its display projected, as noted in a CarUp report. MG fared better, but its charging speeds never reached its promised nearly-400 kW charging speed. Tesla’s Model Y, by comparison, managed energy calculations precisely and arrived at each stop without issue.

Tesla leads in areas that matter

Charging times from 25% to 80% showed that the MG was the fastest at 17 minutes, while Tesla and BYD were close at 28 and 29 minutes, respectively. Overall efficiency and cost told a different story, however. The Model Y consumed 19.4 kWh per 100 km, compared to 22.2 for MG and 23.9 for BYD. Over the full trip, Tesla’s charging costs totaled just £82 thanks to its supercharger network, far below BYD’s £130 and MG’s £119. 

Advertisement

What Car? Magazine’s testers concluded that despite BYD’s rapid sales growth and the MG IM6’s seriously impressive charging speeds, Tesla remains the more compelling real-world choice. The Model Y just offers stability, efficiency, and a proven charging infrastructure through its Supercharging network. And as per the magazine’s hosts, the Model Y is even the cheapest car to own among the three that were tested.

Watch What Car? Magazine’s 500-mile test in the video below.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Tesla Cybertruck slapped with world’s least intimidating ticket, and it’s pure cringe

One cannot help but cringe and feel second-hand embarrassment at the idea of a person just driving around with a stack of these babies.

Published

on

Credit: Ryan Torres/X

A Cybertruck parked at Stanford Shopping Center in California was recently hit with what might be the most try-hard piece of paper ever slipped under a wiper blade: a “fake citation” accusing the driver of supporting a “fascist car.” 

The note, shared on X by Tesla staff program manager Ryan Torres, quickly made the rounds on X, where it quickly gained attention as an example of how not to protest.

The world’s least intimidating ticket

According to the citation, the supposed “violation” was “driving a fascist car.” The remedial action? Take the bus, call an Uber, or ride a bike. The note also dubbed Elon Musk a “chainsaw-wielding Nazi billionaire.” Now, protests against Tesla and Elon Musk have become commonplace this year, but one cannot help but cringe and feel second-hand embarrassment at the idea of a person just driving around with a stack of fake anti-Tesla/Musk citations.

Torres pointed out the irony himself in his post on X. Tesla currently employs over 140,000 Americans, and SpaceX has put the U.S. firmly back at the top of space technology. As Torres put it, maybe the person behind the world’s least intimidating ticket should “read a book on innovation before vandalizing” other people’s property.

Peak performative clownery

Not to mention that the fake ticket’s logic collapses under its own weight. EVs like the Cybertruck are literally designed to reduce emissions, not “destroy the economy.” If anything, Tesla has bolstered the United States’ economy by fueling jobs in engineering, manufacturing, and clean energy. It’s not the first time a Tesla has been the target of vandalism or politically charged notes, but this one stands out for sheer cringe value. 

Advertisement

Torres summed it up neatly: “Peak clownery.” On that point, at least, the citation earns full marks. In a way, though, perhaps cringe fake tickets are not as bad as the literal firebombs that were being thrown at Tesla stores and cars earlier this year because some critics were gleefully misinformed about Elon Musk.

Continue Reading

Trending