News
Scaling Tesla Service Centers with Production
In a high tech startup, small or large, the effectiveness in which the business can scale is crucial to its success. Tesla has been known for its world class customer service, which it undoubtedly has, but recent experiences with replacing a Tesla 12V battery here in New England has me asking the question, can Tesla service scale at a rate to match its production?
The Early Days
Tesla service centers are going above and beyond when it comes to customer service. Some of this is to account for early design and quality challenges with the Model S, but also to make up for the limited number of service centers that are available. Either way, Tesla has done a stellar job with customer satisfaction up until this point. For the second year in a row Tesla has topped Consumer Reports satisfaction index.
But as new Model S owners continue to hear about Tesla’s world-class customer service by word of mouth and through mass media, the expectations are set to an extremely high level that service centers will need to deliver against. As Tesla Motors continues to focus its efforts on production and scaling the Supercharger network, they’ll need to ensure that Service Centers scale at a rate to match the growing customer base.
My Tesla Service Center Experiences
There hasn’t been much to service on my Model S other than a tire rotation thanks to the marvels of its simple design. However, my experiences in dealing with a busy Tesla Service Center led me to believe that they’d rather I have went somewhere else for the tire rotation than to have it performed at their facility.
Generally when I need to take my ICE cars in for service the most I have to wait is 1-2 days. My most recent experience with fixing 12V battery issue through the Tesla Service Center here in New England took nearly 2 weeks. Admittedly, some of that was due to poor weather and a holiday in between but there were still seven business days where the service center was too overloaded to get me in within the usual 1-2 days.
From talking to other Tesla owners it sounds like service experiences can be a mixed bag of results depending on where you live. One Model S owner based out of California, reported a similar issue with the 12V battery but managed to receive a call back within 15 minutes and later booked for service the following day. As for me? It took several phone calls, two emails and almost an entire business day gone before I was able to get schedule an appointment. The actual service that the Tesla technicians performed was excellent, but the scheduling process was abysmal.
- A Norwegian Tesla ownership experience
- Tesla LA Club unveils Los Angeles’ largest Tesla Service Center
When the day of service finally arrived, I told the Tesla technician that it was fine to pick up the Model S from my work place and bring it back that same day since they didn’t have a loaner available. The technician arrived by Uber promptly at 10:30am, jotted down some notes and then drove away in my car. The service department had promised to have it back by 3:30pm but in reality I got the vehicle back at 7pm. Fortunately I had no other plans that evening.
Scaling Tesla Service Centers
There was one Tesla Service Center serving all points north of Connecticut on the East Coast at the time when I purchase my Model S. The local Tesla Store had mentioned that they sold nine hundred Model S’ in this area alone and this was over a half a year ago. Today there is still only a single service center supporting the entire area but with many more Teslas on the road.
A second Tesla Service Center is planned for Dedham, MA but is not online yet. What I find interesting is the fact that both service centers are geographically close to one another which doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to me.
This is a lot of area to cover for a single or even two service centers. Given the distances involved in covering such a large area, the technicians are running all over New England to pick up or service cars which just doesn’t scale well.
Summary
I believe that Tesla has fallen behind in scaling its service centers supporting the Model S roll out, at least when it comes to the New England area and likely overseas. It’ll be crucial for Tesla to start keeping a closer eye on service center response times and volume of service, if not already.
In addition to monitoring real-time growth of the Supercharging network Tesla owners should also be watching the rate in which Tesla Service Centers are being deployed.
Tesla has finally clarified the situation regarding the viral crash in Texas where a Model 3 slammed into a home.
CEO Elon Musk replied to reports on Monday that stated the crash was due to the company’s Full Self-Driving or Autopilot suite, which seemed unlikely to those who are familiar with it. Video showed the car slamming into a house at an excessive rate of speed, making it highly unlikely the crash was due to the suite’s operation, as it does not travel at those speeds in residential areas.
Musk said:
“This makes no sense. FSD drives slowly through neighborhood streets, and this was a high-speed crash!”
Tesla’s Head of AI, Ashok Elluswamy, added context, revealing that the company’s data shows the driver “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100%.”
He revealed the speed reached by the car was 73 MPH, and the accelerator was still pressed “even after the crash.”
Yup. In this case, the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area. They reached a speed of 73 mph during the crash, and had the accelerator pressed even after the crash.
— Ashok Elluswamy (@aelluswamy) June 22, 2026
Authorities are reportedly investigating “whether Tesla’s Autopilot system played a role after a Model 3 left the roadway…slammed through a brick house at high speed and fatally struck Matha Avila as she sat inside,” the New York Post reported.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is now investigating the crash. Tesla will work with the agency to provide them with whatever information they need in order to clarify the cause of the crash.
Similarly, Tesla had claims of a fatal accident in Harris County, Texas, a few years ago. Early reports indicated that Full Self-Driving was the cause of the crash. After the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) worked with Tesla, the agency proved there was “no use of the Autopilot system at any time during this ownership period of the vehicle, including the time frame up to the last transmitted timestamp on April 17, 2021.”
Tesla alleged “driverless” crash in Texas: What is known so far
“Application of the accelerator pedal was found to be as high as 98.8 percent,” the NTSB said in their findings. The highest recorded speed in the five seconds leading up to the impact was 67 miles per hour. The area where the crash occurred is residential, and Texas State laws have default speed limits of 30 MPH in residential streets.
This appears to be a similar situation. However, an investigation will prove what happened for sure.
SpaceX announced today that it commenced its first-ever public bond offering, marking a significant step in the newly public company’s capital markets strategy.
The company announced an offering of senior unsecured notes expected to raise at least $20 billion.
The move comes just a short time after SpaceX completed one of the largest initial public offerings in history. In mid-June, the company priced shares at $135 and raised more than $85 billion, propelling founder Elon Musk’s net worth past the trillion-dollar mark and giving the firm substantial liquidity.
🚨 SpaceX has announced its inaugural offering of senior unsecured notes.
The net proceeds will be used to repay outstanding loans under its bridge loan facility in full.
This inaugural debt offering represents a financing milestone for SpaceX, which previously depended… pic.twitter.com/pcOZuVbTRv
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) June 22, 2026
According to the company’s SEC filing, the net proceeds from the notes will be used primarily to repay in full the outstanding borrowings under its existing bridge loan facility, cover related fees and expenses, and fund general corporate purposes. The offering is being conducted under Rule 144A, as well as Regulation S, targeting qualified institutional buyers and non-U.S. investors. Notes will be unsecured obligations ranking equally with other unsubordinated debt.
The $20 billion bridge loan was used to refinance approximately $17.5 billion in higher-cost “junk” debt tied to X and xAI. SpaceX had merged with xAI in February 2026 in an all-stock deal. The bridge facility, which matures in September 2027, had represented the bulk of SpaceX’s long-term debt.
SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise
In connection with the bond launch, SpaceX disclosed it held approximately $100.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of June 19. Investor calls began on the announcement date, with pricing and launch expected shortly thereafter. Rating agencies have assigned investment-grade ratings to the proposed bonds, reflecting confidence in SpaceX’s dominant position in commercial launches and the growth trajectory of its Starlink internet offering.
The debt raise also allows SpaceX to optimize its balance sheet by replacing short-term, higher-cost bridge financing with longer-date, lower-cost fixed-income securities. This provides greater financial flexibility to support capital-intensive initiatives, including the development of Starship, the expansion of the Starlink constellation, and the integration of AI capabilities following the xAI combination.
SpaceX shares (NASDAQ: SPCX) fell sharply on the news, dropping over 16 percent overall on the market on Monday. The stock had surged initially after debuting but pulled back amid profit-taking and broader market dynamics.
Overall, the bond offering underscores SpaceX’s transition to a mature public company with access to diverse funding sources. It positions the firm to pursue its long-term vision of multiplanetary expansion and AI infrastructure, while maintaining a disciplined approach to its capital structure in a high-growth but capital-heavy industry.
SpaceX confirmed today that it has officially signed its third massive compute deal, providing compute at its Colossus data center in Southaven, Mississippi.
Reflection AI will gain immediate access to NVIDIA GB300 chips at SpaceX’s Colossus 2 data center. In return, Reflection will pay SpaceX $150 million per month starting on July 1, with total payments reaching approximately $6.3 billion if the contract runs through its duration, which is until 2029. Either party can terminate the agreement with 90 days’ notice after the initial three-month period.
CNBC first reported the deal.
🚨 SpaceXAI has agreed to a new compute deal with Reflection AI.
Reflection gets access to NIVIDIA GB300s, and will pay $150M per month to SpaceXAI for the compute. pic.twitter.com/bNPare8U5u
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) June 22, 2026
This latest partnership highlights SpaceX’s strategy of commercializing its massive Colossus supercomputing infrastructure, originally developed to power Elon Musk’s Grok AI models. The company has rapidly expanded its customer base in the AI sector following its February 2026 merger with xAI, a transaction that valued the combined entity at $1.25 trillion.
SpaceX has previously signed significant compute deals with other major players.
It granted Anthropic exclusive access to the full capacity of its Colossus 1 data center, which exceeds 300 megawatts and includes over 220,000 NVIDIA GPUs. Details from SpaceX’s IPO filings indicate Anthropic will pay $1.25 billion per month through May 2029, potentially generating around $45 billion over the term of the deal.
Additionally, Google agreed to pay SpaceX $920 million per month for compute capacity from October 2026 through June 2029. This 32-month period will provide Google access to roughly 110,000 NVIDIA GPUs, along with supporting processors and memory. Capacity ramps up through September at a reduced fee, with termination options after the first year.
SpaceXA also established arrangements for computing power with Cursor, an AI coding startup. SpaceX acquired them in a $60 billion all-stock deal.
These arrangements position SpaceX’s collective position as an AI infrastructure powerhouse with high-margin revenue potential. The Google deal alone could generate nearly $29.5 billion over its term, while the Reflection contract adds another $6.3 billion.
Combined with the Anthropic arrangement, SpaceX stands to realize tens of billions in revenue from compute leasing in the coming years, which diversifies beyond SpaceX’s traditional rocket launches and Starlink operation.
The deals underscore growing demand for advanced AI training and inference capacity amid chip shortages and surging model development needs. Reflection, valued at $25 billion and focused on “American open intelligence” with government and national security ties, cited recent restrictions on closed models as validation for open-source approaches.
For SpaceX, the partnerships transform capital-intensive data centers into flexible revenue sources while supporting its broader AI ambitions after the company has gone public.
Tesla finally clarifies fatal Texas crash, confirms driver manually overrode acceleration
SpaceX makes $20 billion move to optimize its balance sheet
