News
Tesla amends ‘unfair’ terms and conditions for vehicle deliveries in South Korea
South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission, the number one antitrust watchdog in the country, has ordered Tesla to amend several aspects of its terms and conditions for vehicle purchases and deliveries. The amendments, which were intended to take away “unfair” rules that were detrimental to local customers, were fully implemented voluntarily by Tesla since Friday last week.
The announcement of Tesla’s updated terms and conditions was announced by officials on Tuesday. As noted in The Korea Herald, the updates were intended to address Tesla’s “unfair” rules for local customers, particularly those which indicate that buyers are fully responsible for picking up their orders, and that customers are responsible for any damage inflicted on their vehicles during the purchase process.
Tesla entered South Korea in 2017 with the flagship Model S sedan and the Model X SUV, but it was only until the Model 3 entered the country did the company build some serious momentum. Since launching last year, the Model 3 has taken the lion’s share of the country’s EV market, commanding 43% of the total segment in the first half of 2020. This was despite the presence of well-rounded and affordable EVs from local brands such as the Hyundai Kona Electric and the Kia Niro EV.
In a statement to the Herald, Lee Tae-hwi, the head of the Fair Trade Commission’s terms and conditions examination division, noted that Tesla’s updated rules ensure that local customers are protected. “By correcting unfair terms and conditions of Tesla, customers’ rights will be guaranteed institutionally,” Lee said.
Complaints to the FTC about Tesla’s terms and conditions emerged earlier this year, with customers alleging that the company was implementing unfair contracts. Buyers reported that if damages occur to a vehicle they purchased, the company simply issued a 100,000 won ($84) refund, which only corresponded to a part of the car’s order fee. Others alleged that Tesla refused to take responsibility for any issues reported after a car’s designated delivery period.
With its updated terms and conditions, Tesla has stated that it would be compensating customers for their loss and inconvenience if the damages to their vehicles were intentional or caused by negligence. Tesla also noted that it will be liable for damages that happen during the delivery process. The company added that it will take responsibility for issues in its vehicles even after the designated delivery period has passed. Also, orders could only be canceled by Tesla if the vehicle in question was used in illegal transactions, such as unauthorized resales or crimes.
Apart from these, the updated terms and conditions prevent Tesla from transferring contracts made with its customers at its discretion. Transfers of contracts now would need to be made in accordance with South Korea’s relevant statutes. Lastly, the electric car maker is expected to start delivering cars to a customer’s preferred location for an additional fee. This gives more options for buyers, particularly those who prefer to not pick up their cars from a delivery center.
It should be noted that Tesla is not the only automaker being affected by the South Korea FTC’s initiatives. According to the watchdog agency, the terms and conditions of other foreign automakers such as Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, and Renault, could also be recommended for amendments. Such updates benefit the consumer, after all, as they incentivize companies to ensure that their vehicles are in their best condition when they are handed over to customers.
Elon Musk
Tesla’s Elon Musk: 10 billion miles needed for safe Unsupervised FSD
As per the CEO, roughly 10 billion miles of training data are required due to reality’s “super long tail of complexity.”
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has provided an updated estimate for the training data needed to achieve truly safe unsupervised Full Self-Driving (FSD).
As per the CEO, roughly 10 billion miles of training data are required due to reality’s “super long tail of complexity.”
10 billion miles of training data
Musk comment came as a reply to Apple and Rivian alum Paul Beisel, who posted an analysis on X about the gap between tech demonstrations and real-world products. In his post, Beisel highlighted Tesla’s data-driven lead in autonomy, and he also argued that it would not be easy for rivals to become a legitimate competitor to FSD quickly.
“The notion that someone can ‘catch up’ to this problem primarily through simulation and limited on-road exposure strikes me as deeply naive. This is not a demo problem. It is a scale, data, and iteration problem— and Tesla is already far, far down that road while others are just getting started,” Beisel wrote.
Musk responded to Beisel’s post, stating that “Roughly 10 billion miles of training data is needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving. Reality has a super long tail of complexity.” This is quite interesting considering that in his Master Plan Part Deux, Elon Musk estimated that worldwide regulatory approval for autonomous driving would require around 6 billion miles.
FSD’s total training miles
As 2025 came to a close, Tesla community members observed that FSD was already nearing 7 billion miles driven, with over 2.5 billion miles being from inner city roads. The 7-billion-mile mark was passed just a few days later. This suggests that Tesla is likely the company today with the most training data for its autonomous driving program.
The difficulties of achieving autonomy were referenced by Elon Musk recently, when he commented on Nvidia’s Alpamayo program. As per Musk, “they will find that it’s easy to get to 99% and then super hard to solve the long tail of the distribution.” These sentiments were echoed by Tesla VP for AI software Ashok Elluswamy, who also noted on X that “the long tail is sooo long, that most people can’t grasp it.”
News
Tesla earns top honors at MotorTrend’s SDV Innovator Awards
MotorTrend’s SDV Awards were presented during CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
Tesla emerged as one of the most recognized automakers at MotorTrend’s 2026 Software-Defined Vehicle (SDV) Innovator Awards.
As could be seen in a press release from the publication, two key Tesla employees were honored for their work on AI, autonomy, and vehicle software. MotorTrend’s SDV Awards were presented during CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
Tesla leaders and engineers recognized
The fourth annual SDV Innovator Awards celebrate pioneers and experts who are pushing the automotive industry deeper into software-driven development. Among the most notable honorees for this year was Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s Vice President of AI Software, who received a Pioneer Award for his role in advancing artificial intelligence and autonomy across the company’s vehicle lineup.
Tesla also secured recognition in the Expert category, with Lawson Fulton, a staff Autopilot machine learning engineer, honored for his contributions to Tesla’s driver-assistance and autonomous systems.
Tesla’s software-first strategy
While automakers like General Motors, Ford, and Rivian also received recognition, Tesla’s multiple awards stood out given the company’s outsized role in popularizing software-defined vehicles over the past decade. From frequent OTA updates to its data-driven approach to autonomy, Tesla has consistently treated vehicles as evolving software platforms rather than static products.
This has made Tesla’s vehicles very unique in their respective sectors, as they are arguably the only cars that objectively get better over time. This is especially true for vehicles that are loaded with the company’s Full Self-Driving system, which are getting progressively more intelligent and autonomous over time. The majority of Tesla’s updates to its vehicles are free as well, which is very much appreciated by customers worldwide.
Elon Musk
Judge clears path for Elon Musk’s OpenAI lawsuit to go before a jury
The decision maintains Musk’s claims that OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit structure violated early assurances made to him as a co-founder.
A U.S. judge has ruled that Elon Musk’s lawsuit accusing OpenAI of abandoning its founding nonprofit mission can proceed to a jury trial.
The decision maintains Musk’s claims that OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit structure violated early assurances made to him as a co-founder. These claims are directly opposed by OpenAI.
Judge says disputed facts warrant a trial
At a hearing in Oakland, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers stated that there was “plenty of evidence” suggesting that OpenAI leaders had promised that the organization’s original nonprofit structure would be maintained. She ruled that those disputed facts should be evaluated by a jury at a trial in March rather than decided by the court at this stage, as noted in a Reuters report.
Musk helped co-found OpenAI in 2015 but left the organization in 2018. In his lawsuit, he argued that he contributed roughly $38 million, or about 60% of OpenAI’s early funding, based on assurances that the company would remain a nonprofit dedicated to the public benefit. He is seeking unspecified monetary damages tied to what he describes as “ill-gotten gains.”
OpenAI, however, has repeatedly rejected Musk’s allegations. The company has stated that Musk’s claims were baseless and part of a pattern of harassment.
Rivalries and Microsoft ties
The case unfolds against the backdrop of intensifying competition in generative artificial intelligence. Musk now runs xAI, whose Grok chatbot competes directly with OpenAI’s flagship ChatGPT. OpenAI has argued that Musk is a frustrated commercial rival who is simply attempting to slow down a market leader.
The lawsuit also names Microsoft as a defendant, citing its multibillion-dollar partnerships with OpenAI. Microsoft has urged the court to dismiss the claims against it, arguing there is no evidence it aided or abetted any alleged misconduct. Lawyers for OpenAI have also pushed for the case to be thrown out, claiming that Musk failed to show sufficient factual basis for claims such as fraud and breach of contract.
Judge Gonzalez Rogers, however, declined to end the case at this stage, noting that a jury would also need to consider whether Musk filed the lawsuit within the applicable statute of limitations. Still, the dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI is now headed for a high-profile jury trial in the coming months.
Tesla’s Elon Musk: 10 billion miles needed for safe Unsupervised FSD
Tesla earns top honors at MotorTrend’s SDV Innovator Awards
