Update:
Earlier this month, Teslarati reached out to the Canadian office for a comment on the possibility of a Tesla Gigafactory in Canada.
Minister Champagne’s spokesperson didn’t comment directly on the possibility of a Tesla Gigafactory in Canada. However, she emphasized that Canada was working to ensure its auto industry’s future.
“We know how important the auto industry is to the Canadian economy and to the hundreds of thousands of Canadian workers in this sector. That’s why Minister Champagne has worked tirelessly to secure the future of Canada’s auto industry, including bringing more companies to Canada and the entire electric vehicle ecosystem. This includes announcements with LGES / Stellantis in Ontario, GM / POSCO and BASF in Quebec, Umicore, GM and Brightdrop, and many others,” she told Teslarati reporter Johnna Crider.
“It is good to see that our government’s investments are attracting the attention of automakers and companies from around the world. We will continue to do everything to ensure that Canadians can benefit from the global transition to electric vehicles.”
One of these investments includes Stellantis’ plans to invest $3.8 billion CAD in its Windsor and Brampton (Ontario) assembly plants. BASF also has plans for its battery materials and recycling facility in Bécancour, Quebec.
Original Article Below:
Tesla talked with Canada’s Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry Francois-Philippe Champagne (FPC) about its potential supply chain expansion plans in the country.
The Canadian Minister visited Tesla’s facility in Markham for the talk. Champagne also took a tour and test drive at Tesla Canada’s Markham site. In a tweet, he also revealed that all Tesla cars have “a piece of Canada” in them.
Minister Champagne was talking about Tesla’s Markham facility and how it contributes to the company’s manufacturing efforts. Tesla Canada’s Markham site produces some machines installed in the company’s gigafactories worldwide. According to Mayor Frank Scarpitti of Markham, Tesla Canada makes “state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment” for Tesla gigafactories “in the production of batteries.”
Tesla Canada Gigafactory
There’s been a lot of talk lately about a Tesla Canada Gigafactory. In June, Tesla was reportedly considering locations in North America for its next plant. It was looking at options in Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
At the recent 2022 Shareholders Roundup, Elon Musk announced that Tesla might announce the location of its next gigafactory later this year. Musk asked the crowd where they thought Tesla should build a factory, and Canada seemed to be a top choice.
“I’m half Canadian, so maybe I should,” Musk jokingly told the crowd.
Tesla and the Inflation Reduction Act
Given Minister Champagne’s tweet, Tesla might plan to strike a supply chain deal for battery production in Canada. According to Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN)—a government department—the country “is a key global producer of copper, nickel, and cobalt.” Canada also hosts advanced mineral projects for lithium, graphite, and vanadium.
U.S. President Joe Biden recently signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which will go into effect on December 31, 2022. The law includes battery requirements the EV automakers must meet to qualify for EV tax credits. In the short term, the law requires at least 40% of materials used in batteries to be sourced from North America or a U.S. trading partner by 2024. The requirement will increase to 100% by 2029.
Currently, Tesla does not qualify for EV tax credits because it hit the 200,000 cap under the old system. However, once the Inflation Reduction Act takes effect, some Tesla vehicles would qualify for the EV tax credits—provided that the company follows the battery requirements.
The Teslarati team would appreciate hearing from you. If you have any tips, contact me at maria@teslarati.com or via Twitter @Writer_01001101.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
