News
Tesla patent points to battery cell improvements with clever deformation detection process
A recent patent published late August has revealed that Tesla is working on a monitoring system and apparatus that will allow the electric car maker to detect deformations in battery cells in a more effective manner.
Tesla’s patent application, titled “Apparatus and Method for Detection of Deformation in Battery Cells,” notes that battery cycle life is among the most crucial parameters to ensure optimal performance in machines such as electric vehicles and energy storage devices. Over the course of their lifetime, battery cells will be subjected to multiple charge and discharge cycles, at times in vastly varying conditions and environments.
As noted by the company in its patent application, there are instances when cells operate in an environment where the ambient temperature may intermittently surge to levels above the stable thermal temperature for normal operations. Cells could also be subjected to high charge and discharge rates and large periodic loads, which could result in significant heating, among other reactions.
Subjected to these factors, battery cells could experience several effects, such as the thickening of electrodes or the volume expansion of electrochemically active materials within the cell itself. These expansions could ultimately result in cells experiencing deformation, which could, in turn, result in both reversible and irreversible mechanical strain, as well as the potential degradation of the battery’s electrodes.
These battery cell deformations are traditionally monitored using strain gauges or optical gauges that exclusively detect and evaluate deformations at single points in a cell. Tesla noted that this system has space for improvements, since optical evaluations might not provide the correct status of deformation across the entire surface of a battery. This could result in strain and deformation measurements that are inaccurate.
With these factors in mind, Tesla has come up with a deformation detection apparatus that enables the contactless detection of deformations and/or swelling of the battery across the entire surface of the cell itself. Tesla describes the deformation detection apparatus as follows.
“A deformation detection apparatus includes a cell movement-control assembly to handle a linear motion and a rotational motion of a battery cell, a body that supports the cell movement-control assembly, a digital micrometer, and control circuitry. The control circuitry controls a displacement of the battery cell between a first position and a second position along a longitudinal axis through a scanning region of the digital micrometer and a plurality of rotational positions of the battery cell at a plurality of charge states and a plurality of discharge states. The control circuitry measures a plurality of outer diameter values of the battery cell for a plurality of linear positions and a plurality of rotational positions along the longitudinal axis of the battery cell and determines a change in a geometrical shape (deformation and/or strain) of the battery cell for the plurality of linear positions and the plurality of rotational positions.”
According to the electric car maker, the battery cell deformation monitoring process outlined in its patent will provide advantages over traditional monitoring methods.
“The disclosed apparatus, such as the apparatus 100 and method of determination of deformations in the battery cell 112 advantageously provides a contactless solution for deformation detection in the battery cells, as compared to conventional contact-based solutions. Further, instead of measuring the plurality of outer diameter values/strain values at a specific point in time, the disclosed apparatus 100 advantageously facilitates measurement of the plurality of outer diameter values/strain values at a plurality of points on the battery cell 112. The apparatus 100 enables detection of localized/non-localized deformation regions on the battery cell 112, which may exhibit signs of deformation at different charge/discharge states at different points in time.”
Tesla’s recently published patent application for its new battery cell deformation detection apparatus could be accessed in full here.
The implications of Tesla’s recent patent are notable. By adopting its deformation detection system, the company would be able to evaluate the quality of its cells and their operating limits more effectively. This could open the doors to improvements in the company’s batteries, which could, in turn, result in even more range and performance for Tesla’s electric vehicles.
Tesla holds a notable lead among automakers in terms of battery technology, as exhibited by the company’s electric vehicles’ vastly superior range compared to the competition. This is represented by Tesla’s recent “Raven” update to the 100 kWh Model X, which allowed the SUV to travel 325 miles in one charge. This is notably impressive, considering that the Audi e-tron, a smaller, lighter vehicle equipped with a 95 kWh battery pack (5% smaller than the Model X), is only EPA-rated for 204 miles per charge (38% less range than Tesla’s larger, heavier vehicle). A report from German business newspaper Wirtschaftswoche has also determined that Tesla’s batteries for the Model 3 have over four times less cobalt compared to the batteries utilized by Volkswagen today.
Elon Musk
Tesla owners explore potential FSD pricing options as uncertainty looms
We asked Tesla owners what the company should price Full Self-Driving moving forward, as now it’s going to be subscription-based. There were some interesting proposals.
Tesla is starting the process of removing the ability to purchase the Full Self-Driving suite outright, as it pulled the purchase option in the United States over the weekend.
However, there has been some indication by CEO Elon Musk that the price of the subscription will increase as the suite becomes more robust. But Tesla finds itself in an interesting situation with this: the take rate for Full Self-Driving at $99 per month is about 12 percent, and Musk needs a significant increase in this rate to reach a tranche in his new compensation package.
This leaves Tesla and owners in their own respective limbos: Tesla needs to find a price that will incentivize consumers to use FSD, while owners need Tesla to offer something that is attractive price-wise.
We asked Tesla owners what the company should price Full Self-Driving moving forward, as now it’s going to be subscription-based. There were some interesting proposals.
Price Reduction
Although people are willing to pay the $99 per month for the FSD suite, it certainly is too high for some owners. Many suggested that if Tesla would back down the price to $49, or somewhere around that region, many owners would immediately subscribe.
Others suggested $69, which would make a lot of sense considering Musk’s obsession with that number.
Different Pricing for Supervised and Unsupervised
With the release of the Unsupervised version of Full Self-Driving, Tesla has a unique opportunity to offer pricing for different attention level requirements.
$50/mo for supervised.
$300/mo for unsupervised including insurance.— pɦoɿɟ pᴉʌɒp (@CSUDavid) February 15, 2026
Unsupervised Full Self-Driving would be significantly more expensive, but not needed by everyone. Many people indicate they would still like to drive their cars manually from time to time, but others said they’d just simply be more than okay with only having Supervised FSD available in their cars.
Time-Based Pricing
Tesla could price FSD on a duration-based pricing model, including Daily, Weekly, Monthly, and Annual rates, which would incentivize longer durations with better pricing.
Annually, the rate could be $999 per year, while Monthly would stay at $99. However, a Daily pass of FSD would cost somewhere around $10, while a $30 per week cost seems to be ideal.
These all seem to be in line with what consumers might want. However, Tesla’s attitude with FSD is that it is the future of transportation, and with it offering only a Monthly option currently, it does not seem as if it will look as short-term as a Daily pass.
Tiered Pricing
This is perhaps the most popular option, according to what we’ve seen in comments and replies.
This would be a way to allow owners to pick and choose which FSD features they would like most and pay for them. The more features available to you, the more it costs.
For example, if someone only wanted Supervised driving and Autopark, it could be priced at $50 per month. Add in Summon, it could be $75.
This would allow people to pick only the features they would use daily.
Tesla has left a single loophole to purchase Full Self-Driving outright. On Sunday, the option officially disappeared from the Online Design Studio in the United States, as Tesla transitioned to a Subscription-only purchasing plan for the FSD suite.
However, there is still one way to get the Full Self-Driving suite in an outright manner, which would not require the vehicle owner to pay monthly for the driver assistance program — but you have to buy a Model S or Model X.
Months ago, Tesla launched a special “Luxe Package” for the Model S and Model X, which included Full Self-Driving for the life of the vehicle, as well as free Supercharging at over 75,000 locations, as well as free Premium Connectivity, and a Four-Year Premium Service package, which includes wheel and tire protection, windshiel protection, and recommended maintenance.
🚨 Tesla increased the price of both the Model S and Model X by $10,000, but both vehicles now include the “Luxe Package,” which includes:
-Full Self-Driving
-Four years of included maintenance, tire and wheel repairs, and windshield repairs/replacements
-Free lifetime… pic.twitter.com/LKv7rXruml— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) August 16, 2025
It would also be available through the purchase of a Cyberbeast, the top trim of the Cybertruck lineup.
This small loophole would allow owners to avoid the monthly payment, but there have been some changes in the fine print of the program, as Tesla has added that it will not be transferable to subsequent vehicle owners or to another vehicle.
This goes for the FSD and the Supercharging offers that come with the Luxe Package.
For now, Tesla still has the Full Self-Driving subscription priced at $99 per month. However, that price is expected to increase over the course of some time, especially as its capabilities improve. Tesla seems to be nearing Unsupervised FSD based on Musk’s estimates for the Cybercab program.
There is the potential that Tesla offers both Unsupervised and Supervised FSD for varying prices, but this is not confirmed.
In other countries, Tesla has pushed back the deadline to purchase the suite outright, as in Australia, it has been adjusted to March 31.
News
Tesla Sweden’s port deal sparks political clash in Trelleborg
The extension of Tesla’s lease has drawn criticism from the local Social Democratic opposition.
Tesla Sweden’s lease agreement at the Port of Trelleborg has triggered a political dispute, with local leaders divided over whether the municipally owned port should continue renting space to the electric vehicle maker amidst its ongoing conflict with the IF Metall union.
Tesla Sweden’s recently extended contract with the Port of Trelleborg has triggered calls for greater political oversight of future agreements.
Tesla has used the Port of Trelleborg to import vehicles into Sweden amid a blockade by the Transport Workers’ Union, as noted in a report from Dagens Arbete (DA). By routing cars via trucks on passenger ferries, the company has maintained deliveries despite the labor dispute. Vehicles have also been stored and prepared in facilities leased from the municipal port company.
The extension of Tesla’s lease has drawn criticism from the local Social Democratic opposition. Initially, the Port of Trelleborg hinted that it would not enter into new agreements with Tesla, but it eventually opted to renew its existing contract with the EV maker anyway.
Lennart Höckert, an opposition councilor, described the port’s decision as a “betrayal of the Swedish model,” arguing that a municipally owned entity should not appear to side with one party in an active labor dispute.
“If you want to protect the Swedish model, you shouldn’t get involved in a conflict and help one of the parties. When you as a company do this, it means that you are actually taking a position and making things worse in an already ongoing conflict,” Höckert said.
He added that the party now wants politicians to review and approve future rental agreements involving municipal properties at the port.
The proposal has been sharply criticized by Mathias Andersson of the Sweden Democrats, who chairs the municipal board. In comments to local media, Andersson described the Social Democrats’ approach as “Kim Jong Un-style,” arguing that political leaders should not micromanage a company governed by its own board.
“I believe that the port should be run like any other business,” Andersson said. He also noted that operational decisions fall under the authority of the Port of Trelleborg’s board instead of elected officials.
Tesla owners explore potential FSD pricing options as uncertainty looms
Tesla leaves a single loophole to purchase Full Self-Driving outright
