News
Tesla reaches preliminary agreement with battery supplier in China
Tesla’s electric cars produced at Gigafactory 3 will reportedly be powered by batteries from Chinese battery manufacturer Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL). The two companies reportedly reached a preliminary agreement allowing for CATL to supply Tesla with lithium-ion batteries that will power its electric vehicles.
In late August, Tesla CEO Elon Musk traveled to Shanghai where he met with CATL Chairman Zeng Yuqun. The two agreed upon a non-binding deal that is expected to be finalized and signed in mid-2020, according to Bloomberg, but there are details that have yet to be determined, such as how many batteries will be purchased and if the companies will enter a global supply contract.
The global supply contract would make CATL an one of Gigafactory 3’s battery suppliers. The batteries CATL would supply to Tesla would power the company’s Made-in-China Model 3 sedan. Tesla will continue to utilize both Panasonic and LG Chem batteries for the vehicle until the agreement with CATL is complete, noted the publication’s sources.
The global supply contract Tesla and CATL are working toward would be beneficial to the Silicon Valley-based electric car maker because it will allow them to rely less on importing batteries from Panasonic to China, eliminating the possibility of incurring additional costs from tariffs as the U.S. and China continue to work through a trade war. Batteries are already the most expensive part of an electric vehicle, and locking in a deal with a domestic company would allow Tesla to begin expansion into China’s automotive market that was recently named as the biggest in the world, according to Nolasia.
The agreement with Tesla means CATL would be recognized as one of the biggest up-and-comers in the market for battery manufacturers. They already supply automotive battery cells Volkswagen and Daimler and to popular Chinese electric vehicle startup NIO. Adding Tesla as a client would likely skyrocket CATL reputation considering that it is providing battery cells to the auto industry’s premier EV maker.
Tesla’s Gigafactory 3 is the first automotive plant for the company located outside the United States and is expected to produce 3,000 Model 3 units a week according to Global VP Grace Tao. Tesla broke ground on Gigafactory 3 in January 2019, and the company expects to begin mass production before the end of the year.
CATL will not be the only company to supply Tesla with batteries after the deal is signed, as other companies such as LG Chem are also reportedly being tapped for Gigafactory 3’s battery cell supply. The advantage of having multiple large-scale battery suppliers could help drive down the overall cost of batteries according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Kevin Kim. This could eventually drive down the cost of the Model 3 for Chinese buyers, who will have to pay around $50,000 for the sedan.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
