News
US state hosting Tesla’s Cybertruck factory targets EV owners with higher fees
Texas may have welcomed Tesla warmly with its support for the electric car maker’s Gigafactory TX project, but the state, or at least some of its officials, still seem to operate under the premise that EV adoption is something that could be stopped. This was highlighted recently by Rep. Ken King, a Panhandle Republican who wishes to add fees imposed on electric vehicle drivers in the state.
Under King’s proposal, electric car owners would be hit with an additional $200 registration and annual renewal fee to help shore up the state’s road funds, which rely on gas taxes. King’s proposal also penalizes owners of hybrid vehicles, though not as much, with the representative suggesting an additional $100 for registrations and renewals.
As noted in a report from the Houston Chronicle, revenue from the proposed additional EV registration and renewal fees would be going to the state highway fund. The Texas Comptroller has reported about $14.2 billion in revenue during 2019, and estimates suggest that 2020 revenues would be at around $14.6 billion.
Drivers of gas-powered vehicles in Texas pay a state tax of $0.20 per gallon, which is used to support the highway fund. As vehicles became more efficient and amidst the emergence of electric cars and hybrids, however, the state’s annual gas tax revenues have flattened and even declined. During the fiscal year 2020, Texas collected $2.6 billion in gas tax revenue. That’s about 7% less than the $2.8 billion collected in the fiscal year 2019.
King is not only aiming for higher EV registrations and renewals, either. This week, he also introduced a bill that would add a $0.01 tax to every kWh of energy generated by wind, solar, coal, and nuclear power. Interestingly enough, power generated from natural gas sources would be exempt under King’s bill.
If the Texas representative’s efforts prove successful, car buyers in the state may very well be disenchanted to purchase all-electric vehicles, especially considering that one of the most notable advantages of EVs is their affordable operating costs. By imposing higher fees on electric cars, the state would give the impression that it is more financially sound for consumers to go for gas guzzlers instead.
In several other states where EVs are targeted with extra fees, the additional charges could climb so high that electric car owners can end up paying more than what they would have paid in gas taxes had they owned fossil fuel-powered cars instead. Consumer Reports noted that in some cases, EV owners end up paying up to four times more than what they would have paid in gas taxes.
Overall, the proposal from the TX official is unfortunate, especially considering that Tesla is building its roots in the state. Gigafactory Texas is poised to be the electric car maker’s most impressive vehicle production facility yet, and it would build what could very well be the defining EV of the post-Tesla Model S era. The Cybertruck is a unique all-American vehicle that will be made in Texas, after all, so it would be pretty nonsensical if the vehicle ends up costing its buyers more in registration and renewal fees just because it doesn’t pollute the air.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
