News
US state hosting Tesla’s Cybertruck factory targets EV owners with higher fees
Texas may have welcomed Tesla warmly with its support for the electric car maker’s Gigafactory TX project, but the state, or at least some of its officials, still seem to operate under the premise that EV adoption is something that could be stopped. This was highlighted recently by Rep. Ken King, a Panhandle Republican who wishes to add fees imposed on electric vehicle drivers in the state.
Under King’s proposal, electric car owners would be hit with an additional $200 registration and annual renewal fee to help shore up the state’s road funds, which rely on gas taxes. King’s proposal also penalizes owners of hybrid vehicles, though not as much, with the representative suggesting an additional $100 for registrations and renewals.
As noted in a report from the Houston Chronicle, revenue from the proposed additional EV registration and renewal fees would be going to the state highway fund. The Texas Comptroller has reported about $14.2 billion in revenue during 2019, and estimates suggest that 2020 revenues would be at around $14.6 billion.
Drivers of gas-powered vehicles in Texas pay a state tax of $0.20 per gallon, which is used to support the highway fund. As vehicles became more efficient and amidst the emergence of electric cars and hybrids, however, the state’s annual gas tax revenues have flattened and even declined. During the fiscal year 2020, Texas collected $2.6 billion in gas tax revenue. That’s about 7% less than the $2.8 billion collected in the fiscal year 2019.
King is not only aiming for higher EV registrations and renewals, either. This week, he also introduced a bill that would add a $0.01 tax to every kWh of energy generated by wind, solar, coal, and nuclear power. Interestingly enough, power generated from natural gas sources would be exempt under King’s bill.
If the Texas representative’s efforts prove successful, car buyers in the state may very well be disenchanted to purchase all-electric vehicles, especially considering that one of the most notable advantages of EVs is their affordable operating costs. By imposing higher fees on electric cars, the state would give the impression that it is more financially sound for consumers to go for gas guzzlers instead.
In several other states where EVs are targeted with extra fees, the additional charges could climb so high that electric car owners can end up paying more than what they would have paid in gas taxes had they owned fossil fuel-powered cars instead. Consumer Reports noted that in some cases, EV owners end up paying up to four times more than what they would have paid in gas taxes.
Overall, the proposal from the TX official is unfortunate, especially considering that Tesla is building its roots in the state. Gigafactory Texas is poised to be the electric car maker’s most impressive vehicle production facility yet, and it would build what could very well be the defining EV of the post-Tesla Model S era. The Cybertruck is a unique all-American vehicle that will be made in Texas, after all, so it would be pretty nonsensical if the vehicle ends up costing its buyers more in registration and renewal fees just because it doesn’t pollute the air.
Tesla has adjusted the functionality of a crucial climate feature as Winter weather has started to arrive throughout some parts of the United States. The new feature was highly requested by owners.
Tesla has a Cabin Overheat Protection feature that helps keep the temperature regulated if it reaches a certain threshold. Inversely, it can be used in cold weather as well, which will automatically warm the cabin if it sinks to a temperature that is too low for the owner’s comfort.
This is a great way to keep the cabin either warmed up just enough or cooled down just enough so that it never gets too hot or too cold. Extreme temperatures could damage certain parts of the vehicle or damage personal belongings that are kept inside the car.
Overheat protection is a great thing to have in hot climates like Arizona or Texas, especially with the Premium trims of the Model 3 and Model Y, which feature a glass roof.
Many owners appreciate the feature, but they argue that using it at home will utilize too much energy, especially during extreme temperatures. For a while, many Tesla fans have requested an option to disable this feature when the car is parked at home, which the company recently added, according to Not a Tesla App.
The feature is part of Software Version 2025.44.3, and the release notes state:
“You can now choose Exclude Home when Cabin Overheat Protection or No A/C is enabled.”
Tesla has been great at listening to what owners want with new features, and this is one that will reserve some charge and prevent unnecessary utilization of available power, especially as the car is parked at home. If owners want to condition the cabin or get the car ready for operation with a comfortable interior, they can utilize the Tesla app to adjust the climate.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk revealed today on the social media platform X that legacy automakers, such as Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis, do not want to license the company’s Full Self-Driving suite, at least not without a long list of their own terms.
“I’ve tried to warn them and even offered to license Tesla FSD, but they don’t want it! Crazy,” Musk said on X. “When legacy auto does occasionally reach out, they tepidly discuss implementing FSD for a tiny program in 5 years with unworkable requirements for Tesla, so pointless.”
I’ve tried to warn them and even offered to license Tesla FSD, but they don’t want it! Crazy …
When legacy auto does occasionally reach out, they tepidly discuss implementing FSD for a tiny program in 5 years with unworkable requirements for Tesla, so pointless. 🤷♂️
🦕 🦕
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 24, 2025
Musk made the remark in response to a note we wrote about earlier today from Melius Research, in which analyst Rob Wertheimer said, “Our point is not that Tesla is at risk, it’s that everybody else is,” in terms of autonomy and self-driving development.
Wertheimer believes there are hundreds of billions of dollars in value headed toward Tesla’s way because of its prowess with FSD.
A few years ago, Musk first remarked that Tesla was in early talks with one legacy automaker regarding licensing Full Self-Driving for its vehicles. Tesla never confirmed which company it was, but given Musk’s ongoing talks with Ford CEO Jim Farley at the time, it seemed the Detroit-based automaker was the likely suspect.
Tesla’s Elon Musk reiterates FSD licensing offer for other automakers
Ford has been perhaps the most aggressive legacy automaker in terms of its EV efforts, but it recently scaled back its electric offensive due to profitability issues and weak demand. It simply was not making enough vehicles, nor selling the volume needed to turn a profit.
Musk truly believes that many of the companies that turn their backs on FSD now will suffer in the future, especially considering the increased chance it could be a parallel to what has happened with EV efforts for many of these companies.
Unfortunately, they got started too late and are now playing catch-up with Tesla, XPeng, BYD, and the other dominating forces in EVs across the globe.
Tesla is backtracking on a strange adjustment it made to its in-car Navigation feature after numerous complaints from owners convinced the company to make a change.
Tesla’s in-car Navigation is catered to its vehicles, as it routes Supercharging stops and preps your vehicle for charging with preconditioning. It is also very intuitive, and features other things like weather radar and a detailed map outlining points of interest.
However, a recent change to the Navigation by Tesla did not go unnoticed, and owners were really upset about it.
For trips that required multiple Supercharger stops, Tesla decided to implement a naming change, which did not show the city or state of each charging stop. Instead, it just showed the business where the Supercharger was located, giving many owners an unwelcome surprise.
However, Tesla’s Director of Supercharging, Max de Zegher, admitted the update was a “big mistake on our end,” and made a change that rolled out within 24 hours:
The naming change should have happened at once, instead of in 2 sequential steps. That was a big miss on our end. We do listen to the community and we do course-correct fast. The accelerated fix rolled out last night. The Tesla App is updated and most in-car touchscreens should…
— Max (@MdeZegher) November 20, 2025
The lack of a name for the city where a Supercharging stop would be made caused some confusion for owners in the short term. Some drivers argued that it was more difficult to make stops at some familiar locations that were special to them. Others were not too keen on not knowing where they were going to be along their trip.
Tesla was quick to scramble to resolve this issue, and it did a great job of rolling it out in an expedited manner, as de Zegher said that most in-car touch screens would notice the fix within one day of the change being rolled out.
Additionally, there will be even more improvements in December, as Tesla plans to show the common name/amenity below the site name as well, which will give people a better idea of what to expect when they arrive at a Supercharger.
Tesla adjusts crucial feature as winter weather arrives
Tesla CEO Elon Musk sends rivals dire warning about Full Self-Driving
