News
The saga continues with Model X driver involved in Montana crash
Mr. Pang is back this time with a second open letter to Tesla
The Tesla Model X driver involved in a Montana crash while using Autopilot is stirring up controversy once again this time asking Tesla Motors to reveal additional details from the incident. It seems that language differences play a large role in this dispute. Acting as his representative, Steven XuΒ sentΒ usΒ a second open letter Mr. Pang penned to Elon Musk, in which he takes issue with Tesla’s account of the accident. The open letter reads as follows:
Here is the second letter from my friend, Mr.Pang.
To Tesla Team:
It has been weeks since I published the letter. No one has ever triedΒ to contact us and discus about the crash. To fully understand the reason thatΒ caused this crash is critical for all tesla drivers. After awhile teslaΒ published a response towards our letter. Most of parts are fit into the story. HoweverΒ there are few points that I would like to point out.
“From this data, we learned thatΒ after you engaged Autosteer, your hands were not detected on the steering wheelΒ for over two minutes. This is contrary to the terms of use when first enablingΒ the feature and the visual alert presented you every time Autosteer isΒ activated.”
I admit that my hands were out of steering wheel after I engagedΒ autopilot. The reason that I was doing that is because I put too much faith inΒ this system. I also believe most Tesla driver would do the something when they
engage autopilot including Elon. The problem here is that Tesla had overΒ advertised this feature by calling it “autopilot”. This feature should named “advanceΒ driving assistant”. It is possible that Tesla had known accident like thisΒ would come sooner or later. Tesla might think that setting up the term byΒ saying “please put hands on steering wheel at all time” would be response freeΒ for Tesla.
2γ As road conditions became increasingly uncertain, the vehicle againΒ alerted you to put your hands on the wheel.
The road condition was better than fine. Lane mark is absolutely clear.Β Road is flat and there is no incoming car. No matter what my sight was neverΒ out of the road. However everything was happened too fast for me to take control.Β Everything happened in less than a second.
3γNo steering torque was then detected until Autosteer was disabled withΒ an abrupt steering action. Immediately following detection of the first impact,Β adaptive cruise control was also disabled, the vehicle began to slow, and youΒ applied the brake pedal.
No one should avoid the cause of the malfunction of autopilot feature.Β Since you start explaining it, I realize that you are implying that some sortΒ of force was applied to the steering wheel by me. I had no idea how Tesla gotΒ this clue. There are two points I want to make here. First, my hands were notΒ on the steering wheel. Second no obstacle was on the road to alter the steeringΒ wheel direction. The one and the only one that was taking control of thisΒ entire vehicle and steering it away from the road is autopilot software itself.Β Somehow I realize if my hands were on the steering wheel with a force, wouldΒ Tesla blame me for the collision? To me it looks like that if an accident occurΒ by autopilot, either hands are on or not on the steering wheel, Tesla can always find a way out by saying βabrupt steering action”.
Tesla also claimed that “abrupt steering adaptive cruise control wasΒ also disabled, the vehicle began to slow.”
This is nowhere near the truth. The real thing is that vehicle wasΒ NEVER attended to slow from hitting the first pole towards the last. It only tookΒ about a second to hit 12 wood poles. I believe if it wasn’t me who brake theΒ vehicle it would continued cruising. Mr. Huang was injured severely due to highΒ speed impact.
Tesla as a global impact company should respect the truth of everyΒ incident. Nothing is more important hand human life. Lying or manipulating towardsΒ public about what really happened is unacceptable.
Weeks ago I got contacted by Tesla regarding this accident. Since you cannotΒ find a mandarin translator, we rearranged the call again in four hours. HoweverΒ that was the last time when Tesla tries to contact me. What I am asking is toΒ fully reveal the driving data from the collision. Reliability of Autopilot softwareΒ matters to hundreds and thousands of Tesla drivers. I wish to know the entireΒ story about what really happened on us on that collision.
Thanks
Sincerely
Mr. Pang
Steven Xu pointed us to comments being made on the Tesla Motors Club forum thatΒ seeminglyΒ offers Mr. Pang no support at all. In fact, based on those comments, there almost seems to be a cultural bias in play in this situation. One wonders if perhaps things would seem different if they were driving a car in China that only displayed instructions in Mandarin.
Pang’s complaint is very similar to one lodged by a Chinese customer last month whose Tesla crashed on the highway on the way to work. He claimed that the salesman he spoke to before purchasing his car told him specifically that the car could drive itself and proved it by driving with his hands off the wheel during a test drive. Tesla later amended the language it uses to describe its Autopilot system on its Chinese website. It’s possible that same linguistic confusion has a bearing on Mr. Pang’s unfortunate accident.
At this point, it seems the matter will be handled by insurance companies and lawyers. Tesla apparently has had no further contact with Pang. Through Steven, Pang says, “Weeks ago I got contacted by Tesla regarding this accident. Since you cannotΒ find a Mandarin translator, we re-arranged the call again in four hours. However,Β that was the last time when Tesla tries to contact me.
“What I am asking is toΒ fully reveal the driving data from the collision. Reliability of Autopilot software
matters to hundreds and thousands of Tesla drivers. I wish to know the entireΒ story about what really happened on us on that collision.”
Energy
Tesla Model 3 and Model Y can now do what only Cybertruck could
Tesla Model 3 and Model Y can power your home with Powerwall 3 during outages.
Tesla has turned its two top sellers into backup batteries for the house.
Tesla Energy announced on Tuesday that Powershare Home Backup is now available for new Model 3 and Model Y vehicles paired with a Powerwall 3, saying the car can βextend your home backup by over 2 days.β Minutes later, Teslaβs main account quoted the post with a broader pitch: βWith Powerwall 3, every Tesla can now serve as your homeβs backup battery.β
Until this week, the Cybertruck was the only Tesla that could send power back into a home, and that capability only began working alongside Powerwall 3 last month, after years of ambitious targets.
Teslaβs updated Powershare page says every Model 3 and Model Y ordered in the U.S. or Puerto Rico on or after October 1, 2026 can use the feature. Some, but not all, earlier cars also qualify. Owners can check on the touchscreen under Software, then Additional Vehicle Information, where a capable car shows βPowershare Support: Enabled.β As Electrek reported, bidirectional power on the two cars runs through an inverter Tesla calls PCS2 Lite, and the company has not said when that part entered production on each trim.
The home side is simpler. A house that already has a Powerwall 3 and either a Wall Connector 3 or Universal Wall Connector needs no additional equipment, and Tesla says compatibility is enabled through a software update. When the grid drops, the Powerwall and the car work together, with up to 11.52 kW of continuous power available. Teslaβs βover two daysβ estimate assumes a home using 30 kWh per day and a car starting at a 90 percent charge. Standard trims are rated for up to two days, while the Cybertruck adds more than three.
There are limits. Powerwall 2 and Powerwall+ support is listed as βcoming soon.β Model S and Model X are not included, and Grid Support, the program that lets Cybertruck owners in Texas send power back to the grid during demand spikes for bill credits, is not available for Model 3 or Model Y.
The rollout also lines up with something Elon Musk said more than three years ago. At Teslaβs March 2023 Investor Day, Musk said, βI donβt think very many people are going to want to use bidirectional charging, unless you have a Powerwall.β Tesla has now shipped the feature for its volume cars with exactly that requirement attached.
The Powerwall pairing was the hard part on Cybertruck. Tesla told owners in December 2025 that Powershare with Powerwall had been pushed to mid 2026, and lead engineer Wes Morrill explained that two devices capable of forming a homeβs grid have to negotiate which one leads during an outage, across multiple generations of hardware. With that work done for the truck, Tesla was able to extend it to the Model 3 and Model Y within a month.
Ford and GM have offered home backup from their EVs for several years, but both require a separate inverter and backup hardware. Teslaβs version leans on equipment many Powerwall 3 owners already have on the wall. Powershare for the two cars also ships as part of software update 2026.38.3, the same release that began delivering Halloween Mode on Tuesday.
Tesla is now starting to ship a “Halloween Mode” that is filled with some creepy and fun features; the company says, “This spooky update turns your Tesla into a haunted house on wheels.”
The update is just the latest in a series of updates that Tesla typically ships out in a seasonal fashion. The Spring and Summer Updates provided some fun novelty items while also packing some cool features that are actually useful for the ownership experience.
This one seems to be more fun-forward, and there are not any updates to the Full Self-Driving suite or overall operation of the vehicle. Instead, these novelty features are geared toward getting you in the mood for the Fall and Halloween.
Halloween Mode now rolling out π
This spooky update turns your Tesla into a haunted house on wheels
β Ghost costume on your car’s avatar
β Enable Trick or Treat to play spooky sounds & flicker the lights when visitors approach
β New haunting light show, wraps & lock sound
β A rather chilling Photobooth
β Frighten people remotely by speaking through the app…your car will say it in a voice of its own
Side effects may include neighborhood notoriety
β Tesla (@Tesla) October 6, 2026
New Ghost Costume on Car Avatar
Driver Visualization will now show your vehicle as a ghost, as an all-white sheet is draped over the vehicle. Pedestrians are turned into mummies or skeletons, and other vehicles are all a spooky green:
Credit: Tesla
Additionally, the Park Scene with your Tesla now displays that ghost costume draped over your vehicle in the foreground of a scary backdrop with Jack-o-Lanterns and a haunted house:
Credit: Tesla
Trick or Treat Mode
Trick or Treat Mode will enable the vehicle to play spooky sounds and flicker the lights as visitors approach. This might be a nice touch for when you’re handing out candy to kids on Halloween Night.
Other Features
Tesla is also adding a new Light Show, new Wrap Options, and a new Lock Sound with this update.
Credit: Tesla
Additionally, Photobooth has a new Halloween option:
Credit: Tesla
You will also be able to speak remotely through the app and transmit your voice to people outside, which is not a new feature, but the car will say it in a voice of its own, which is a new feature with that bullhorn-like feature.
Investor's Corner
SpaceX reveals how its 1 Million AI satellite network will work and prevent space collisions
SpaceX reveals plans for one million Starmind AI satellites and calls out operators hiding maneuvers.
SpaceX has put the largest satellite count it has ever published into writing, and it says that plan only works if every other operator in orbit starts sharing what it knows.
In a new Space Safety page highlighted Tuesday morning by Sawyer Merritt on X, SpaceX said it “plans to operate up to 100,000 Starlink satellites and up to 1 million Starmind AI satellites to meet the growing demand for broadband and supercompute.” Starlink has a little over 11,000 satellites in orbit today, so the target alone implies roughly a ninefold expansion of the broadband network.
Starmind is SpaceX’s orbital AI compute constellation. Elon Musk confirmed the Starmind name in June after an xAI trademark filing surfaced, and in August SpaceX said it was working with Nvidia on the compute payload. The FCC accepted the filing for up to one million satellites back in February.
FCC accepts SpaceX filing for 1 million orbital data center plan
SpaceX also released a new render of what a full Starmind constellation could look like. Alongside it, SpaceX VP Michael Nicolls explained why the satellites will not operate on their own. “We need to operate clusters of satellites in tight formation to get enough coherent compute to run AI models efficiently,” Nicolls said. “A cluster will be 10-ish satellites connected with 10 terabits or so of bandwidth between them, and interconnected to the broader constellation.”
That is the most specific detail SpaceX has given on how Starmind will be built. Instead of a million independent servers, the network would work as tightly packed groups of about 10 satellites acting as one compute unit, with Starlink’s laser links carrying results back to Earth.
There is a bright and exciting future for humanity ahead β and space is fundamental to that future.
To achieve this, space safety must be done right. We encourage every operator to not only share ephemeris data proactively the same way Starlink already does, but to also adopt the high standards of space safety that SpaceX and Starlink use every day β https://t.co/QizAkQZvEm
β Starlink (@Starlink) October 6, 2026
Packing satellites that close together, at that scale, makes collision avoidance the central problem, and most of the Space Safety page is aimed at other operators. SpaceX said Starlink encountered collision risks with about 650 unique maneuvering third party satellites in 2026, and only about half of them shared data. Over six months, Starlink recorded roughly 164,000 more collision risks where the closest approach came within four hours of an unannounced maneuver.
Some operators keep maneuver plans private over proprietary concerns, while others cannot get government permission to share them. SpaceX called those policies “counterproductive,” saying they “largely only serve to create preventable collision risk between satellites.” Starlink is also offering a free ephemeris sharing and screening platform that returns risk results within a minute, backed by its Stargaze network of 30,000 optical sensors.
The push comes as the Starmind application draws opposition from astronomers and environmental groups. In a September filing with the FCC, SpaceX said each Starmind satellite could weigh up to 4,000 kg, nearly seven times the mass of a Starlink V2 Mini. Musk has brushed off crowding concerns before, telling viewers in June that “space is enormous” and that SpaceX already knows how to run very large constellations safely.
SpaceX’s Starmind page says its Gigasat factory in Bastrop, Texas, is designed to produce AI satellites at scale, with deployment of thousands of units starting as soon as late 2027.
Tesla Model 3 and Model Y can now do what only Cybertruck could
Tesla ships ‘spooky’ Halloween Mode with creepy and fun features
