News
Ford’s love affair with EVs softens as profitability and consumer trends take focus
Update: headline updated to show Ford is still committed to EVs, just at a less intense rate.
Ford’s love affair with EVs is softening, the automaker announced today, as it shifted plans for its next few vehicles to be hybrid-electric instead of fully electric.
The move comes as profitability and consumer trends are taking focus. Ford has struggled to get its head above water in terms of making money on its EVs, scaling back its investment amount on one occasion and adjusting its strategy on another.
Consumers are also showing more interest in hybrids than pure EVs. Studies have shown that hybrid drivers are among the most satisfied on the road, as a recent survey from ACSI displayed increased satisfaction from those drivers over pure EV and gas engine owners.
Ford is taking steps to pull back from its increased focus on EVs and instead go into a new direction. “We’re committed to creating long-term value by building a competitive and profitable business,” Ford’s Vice Chair and CFO John Lawler said. “With pricing and margin compression, we’ve made the decision to adjust our product and technology roadmap and industrial footprint to meet our goal of reaching positive EBIT within the first 12 months of launch for all new models.”
How is Ford’s Strategy Changing?
Ford’s new strategy will see its next three-row SUVs utilize hybrid technologies. It also wants to adjust the speed at which electric vehicle models are released, hoping to be more aligned with customer adoption instead of keeping pace with industry leaders.
Tesla sells well, but Ford, even though it has been the number two brand in the U.S. for EVs, has not been able to keep pace. Tesla, simply put, is head and shoulders above everyone in the market when it comes to reliability, tech, and charging infrastructure. Although Ford has adopted Tesla’s North American Charging Standard (NACS) and gained access to the Supercharger Network, consumers still lean toward the Model 3 and Model Y, two vehicles that have dominated the market for the past several years.
Ford is taking a $400 million non-cash charge for the write-down of certain product-specific manufacturing assets for all previously planned all-electric SUVs. The company will no longer build these models, it said.
Focus on Commercial EVs
Ford will still be building EVs, but its entire game plan will be shifting significantly. Ford’s next-gen EVs will be built at the Ohio Assembly Plant in 2026 and will start with a commercial van.
The E-Transit will still be produced, as it is the best-selling commercial EV van in the country. It also helps business owners keep their bottom line as it has positive impacts on the total cost of ownership.
A New, Low-Cost, High Efficiency EV
Ford will bring a new mid-sized EV pickup to market in 2027 with more range, utility, and useability. It will be the first vehicle that comes as a result of the platform developed by the Ford Skunkworks team that the company established in 2022.
The platform developed by the Skunkworks team will yield more EVs in “multiple vehicle styles” and is designed to scale quickly thanks to its “minimal complexity.”
A new Electric Truck
Ford’s F-150 Lightning was the best-selling EV truck for several months, although Cybertruck overtook it in June. Ford planned to bring a new truck to market next year, labeling it the “T3.” However, this has been pushed back.
Ford will now bring the T3 pickup to market in the latter half of 2027. This will offer more features and experiences than any other Ford truck, including upgraded bi-directional charging and advanced aerodynamics. It will be built at the BlueOval City Electric Truck Center in Tennessee.
Overall, Ford’s shift in strategy is probably for the better, considering its business was quite literally hemorrhaging money. It is important that it develops and builds EVs, as many customers are still in the market for one and now prefer that powertrain to any other.
However, in the grand scheme, hybrids have taken over as the most desirable powertrain, which is pushing Ford to make this shift in the name of making money and going with what consumers want.
I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at joey@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
News
Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile are trying to shut Starlink out before FCC vote
AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile want 290 MHz cut from an FCC satellite plan before Thursday.
AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile are asking the Federal Communications Commission to pull nearly 300 MHz of spectrum out of a proposal that would let satellite companies like SpaceX offer cell service directly to ordinary phones. The request lands one day before the agency votes on it.
The FCC will vote Thursday, October 29, on a notice of proposed rulemaking that would make an additional 482 MHz available for direct to device service, expanding the number of eligible bands from five to 13, according to the FCC fact sheet. It would also scrap the rule requiring a satellite operator to lease spectrum from carriers, replacing it with a certification that the operator has coexistence agreements in place or holds the terrestrial license itself.
That second path matters for SpaceX. As Teslarati reported earlier this month, SpaceX agreed to buy Grain Management’s nationwide 800 MHz portfolio to turn Starlink Mobile into a full US carrier, adding to the spectrum it already bought from EchoStar.
The carriers want two bands removed, 2.5 GHz and 3.45 GHz, which make up 290 MHz of the 482 MHz on the table. Through industry group CTIA, they argued that about 300 million users depend on those bands and that satellite operations in them are not technically feasible. T-Mobile, which calls 2.5 GHz the foundation of its Ultra Capacity 5G network, said in its own filing that satellite interference could wipe out up to 96% of a cell site’s uplink coverage area and cut uplink speeds by 88% to 99%.
Executives from all three carriers met with FCC staff on October 20, and T-Mobile CEO Srini Gopalan met separately with FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. T-Mobile’s role stands out because it is still SpaceX’s US launch partner for Starlink Mobile. The three carriers have also teamed up on their own satellite joint venture to pool spectrum, a move widely seen as a response to Starlink.
SpaceX is asking for the opposite. In an October 23 filing after meetings with FCC staff and commissioners’ offices, the company asked regulators to add the 902 to 928 MHz band to the proposal. “Doing so now saves time later,” SpaceX wrote. The company also asked the FCC to modernize interference rules and align satellite deployment requirements with those for terrestrial cell networks, saying the goal is to let satellite and ground networks work together so Americans stay connected wherever they are.
The carriers have not been shy about how they view SpaceX as a competitor. On Verizon’s third quarter earnings call Monday, its chief executive said Starlink Mobile “just can’t compete with a terrestrial network” and estimated SpaceX would need four to six years and $300 billion to $500 billion to build a full US carrier network.
Thursday’s vote will not settle which bands survive. Adopting the notice opens a public comment period, with final rules to come later in the proceeding. The FCC already considered and rejected 2.5 GHz for satellite coverage once, in 2024. SpaceX also is not the only satellite player watching: the FCC approved Amazon’s $11.6 billion acquisition of Globalstar on October 27, giving its planned direct to device fleet its own mobile satellite spectrum.
A Tesla Semi caught fire in Hayward, California, which caused both directions of traffic to shut down for hours before being completely reopened early on Wednesday, the California Highway Patrol said.
The fire occurred just after 5:30 local time in Hayward on Tuesday, as the Semi caught fire in the southbound lanes of I-880 before CHP officials made the decision to shut down both lanes of traffic due to potential risks from hazardous chemical smoke.
There were no injuries reported.
🚨 A Tesla Semi reportedly caught fire, with California Highway Patrol confirming. The Semi was on I-880 SB
An estimated 5,000 to 7,000 semi-truck and large commercial vehicle fires occur on U.S. roadways every year
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) October 28, 2026
The cause of the fire is currently unknown, as neither Tesla nor the CHP have not determined a cause.
However, some images taken before the Semi was completely destroyed by the fire seem to indicate this might have been an older unit, as it appears to be one of the designs that Tesla shipped as part of its pilot program, before revising it and starting mass production just a month ago.
@Tslachan From on of the videos looks like it’s an old Semi (not the refresh version that recently started production) https://t.co/KzwmR2kXow
— Area Under The Curve 🎗️ (@AreaUnderCurve) October 28, 2026
At the time of publication, CHP had not returned our request for a comment for additional details, including the Semi involved and any potential collaboration on an investigation between the CHP and Tesla. We will update this story when we hear back from them.
The southbound lanes were reopened at 3:30 a.m. on Wednesday, with the northbound lanes opening last night a few hours after the fire began. The CHP did state that the lithium batteries were “incredibly difficult to extinguish,” according to NBC Bay Area.
The truck’s driver said that the Semi caught fire, but he did not have an explanation.
An estimated 5,000 to 7,000 semi-truck and large commercial vehicle fires occur on U.S. roadways every year.
Tesla’s launch of the “Emergency Drive Away” function a few months back offered owners a safe option to evacuate an area if they were in reasonable danger. The function finally got its first use in the real world, but it appears it was by mistake.
A video shared by u/Joshalander in the r/TeslaLounge subreddit recorded the instance from his vehicle and said the incident took place in Austin this past weekend during the city’s F1 Race.
“Was charging around 6 AM this past Sunday in Austin before heading to the F1 race and heard a pop. Looked over and saw the new emergency drive-away feature in action. Genuinely felt bad for the dude when he got out and realized what happened, since he looked exhausted and only seemed to half-read the prompts.”
🚨 Here’s the first look at Tesla’s Emergency Drive Away function in action:
Apparently this driver accidentally enabled it and drove forward; you can see the Supercharger pull with the car.
Tesla said previously this would cost up to $25k if not used properly. https://t.co/B4qQRrsO6B
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) October 28, 2026
Emergency Drive Away unlatches the Supercharger connector from the vehicle, but still causes damage to both the car and the Supercharger. Tesla has said that it will cost up to $25,000 in repairs to have everything fixed back to normal.
Additionally, the company said that if it were not used in an emergency situation, the driver of the vehicle who activated the Emergency Drive Away feature would be responsible for all repair costs.
Tesla constitutes the following situations as reasonable justifications for activating the feature:
- You face an immediate threat to your life or personal safety.
- You must leave the area immediately.
- Exiting the vehicle is unsafe.
- Unplugging the charge connector would unreasonably delay your departure or expose you to a risk to your personal safety.
After using the feature, Tesla requires the driver to schedule Service so the car can be inspected.
Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile are trying to shut Starlink out before FCC vote
Tesla Semi catches fire in California: what we know
