Investor's Corner
What You Need to Know about Tesla’s Battery Storage Solution
A new tweet from Elon Musk this week promises a new product line debut on April 30 and most, including me, have our guesses that it will be Tesla’s battery storage solution as mentioned in the last quarterly earnings call.
Major new Tesla product line — not a car — will be unveiled at our Hawthorne Design Studio on Thurs 8pm, April 30
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 30, 2015
This article will boil down what we know - where this may be offered and how much money Tesla drivers may need to dish out.
From Dana Hull's article last June in the San Jose Mercury, the battery storage product offers:
- A lithium-ion battery storage system, called the home energy Storage system, from Solar City
- Contained in a 4-foot-tall metal box mounted on the wall of a garage
- Made by Tesla but offered by San Mateo-based SolarCity to its California solar customers as part of a small pilot project.
- Goes for $1,500 down and $15 a month over a 10-year lease period.
SolarCity + Tesla battery pack for storing solar energy. Source: Forum member myI55 via CleanTechnica
Hull received feedback from a battery storage user that's undergoing the pilot program. But more recently, Global Equities Research analyst Trip Chowdhry via Benzinga pulled in some real-world data from two additional people testing Tesla's battery storage solution.
Here are some of the highlights from this article:
- The Battery has to be installed 1.5 feet above the ground, and should have an open space of 1 ft on all sides
- The battery does not make any noise, does not need any maintenance, has no drippings
- The Battery also has an inverter
- The installer offered a choice between 10KWH and 15KWH;
Chowdry's article reported a similar price as to what was reported in the San Jose Mercury article and mentioned that a "10kWh battery could be priced at $13,000 with a 50 percent rebate from PG&E Corporation." That's a hefty rebate and a big incentive.
The Chowdry article also stated that there are battery storage owners in other states, about 100. So it's not limited to California. However, the April 30 announcement could be limited to just current Solar City sales territories.
The Benzinga article mentioned that one owner "charges the battery at night at $0.11 and then sells it back to the grid at 3PM for $0.43, and makes $10 to 12 month doing this."
This revenue opportunity may not exist in all states. In Illinois, solar customers receive a monthly credit based on the number of solar kWh it pushes back to the grid.
This sell-back opportunity for the resident is a point Jigar Shah, solar financier, has emphasized. Shah argues that utilities need to have real-time analytics and a communication infrastructure to provide energy pricing signals quickly to customers. Shah feels the onus is on utilities to modernize and provide residents these tools or else residential battery solutions could be "dead assets."
From the most recent earnings conference call in February, Musk says that Tesla could be producing these battery packs in six months. JB Straubel, Tesla's point person for its energy storage strategy (& gigafactory), reiterated this point last year at an energy industry conference.
Struaubel said, "We see the California mandate for stationary energy storage by 2020 and we're (Tesla) quite a lot more bullish. We think that mandate will be met and far exceeded before the timeframe expires. We all should be thinking bigger."
So are you considering a battery storage solution?
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 aborted at Zero and Musk just told us what broke
Four Raptor engines failed to ignite at T-zero, forcing SpaceX to scrub Starship Flight 13 Thursday.
SpaceX scrubbed the Starship Flight 13 launch attempt Thursday evening at the last possible moment, after four of the Super Heavy booster’s 33 Raptor 3 engines failed to ignite during the startup sequence. The 90-minute window had opened at 6:45 p.m. EDT from Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, and the countdown had proceeded without issue all day, with more than 11.5 million pounds of liquid methane and liquid oxygen being fully loaded into the rocket before the automated abort triggered. SpaceX’s launch directors posted on X, “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt,” and shut down the livestream shortly after.
Musk confirmed the root cause within hours. “Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort,” he wrote on X. “To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed and replaced. Most probable launch timing is early next week.” SpaceX engineers began draining propellant tanks immediately and Booster 20 was rolled back to its hangar for inspection.
The timing adds a layer of significance that did not exist during any of the previous 12 Starship flights. This is the first time SpaceX has attempted to launch Starship since the company made its stock market debut in June, listing under ticker SPCX at $135 per share. Public investors are now watching every Starship outcome in real time, and a last-second abort carries more visibility than it would have six months ago.
Flight 13 was designed to be one of the most consequential tests in the program’s history. It was set to carry 20 Starlink V3 satellites, the first operational payload Starship has ever attempted to deploy. Six of those satellites carried external cameras to photograph Starship’s heat shield from the outside during flight, which would act as a self-inspection approach SpaceX has never attempted before. The mission also needed to complete a Raptor engine relight in space, a step SpaceX skipped on Flight 12 in May after losing an engine during ascent. That Flight 12 booster also flipped 90 degrees off course during its boostback burn when five engines failed to reignite.
SpaceX has not announced an official next launch date. Musk’s “early next week” window points to July 21 or 22 at the earliest, pending the engine swap and a return to the pad.
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Electric vehicle maker Lucid Group has denied rumors of an imminent bankruptcy after a report from this morning sent the stock on a dramatic drop on Wall Street, seeing losses of more than 40 percent during trading hours.
Lucid’s Director of Communications, Nick Twork, responded to the report from Eletric-Vehicles.com, which stated the company’s restructuring advisor, AlixPartners, was asked to review two decisions: taking Lucid shares private or filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The report also claims AlixPartners told the Lucid board to “concentrate on Gravity production while improving its quality, and to temporarily hold back the Lucid Air, the sedan that has defined the company since its launch.”
Twork said:
$LCID The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is…
— Nick Twork (@ntwork) July 14, 2026
Shares rebounded after the response to the report, halving its losses as the trading day neared 3 p.m. Eastern.
Lucid has struggled to get its sales off the ground and into more respectable numbers, but the company is in its early years, when things are hard to begin with. It is also backed by several notable investors, including the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which has nearly limitless money and likely would not ditch an investment of this size so soon.
Lucid shares were down just 14 percent at the time of publication, a far cry from the 55 percent its losses topped out at during the day.
Elon Musk says your Tesla will start to learn your individual preferences
Ron DeSantis calls out media bias in Tesla crash coverage
