News
SpaceX’s “toasty” Falcon 9 booster arrives back at port [Photo Gallery]
The SpaceX steamroller continues to roll on, and the company’s recent launch of KT Sat’s Koreasat 5A satellite is no exception. The 16th Falcon 9 of 2017 took flight from Kennedy Space Center on October 30 and successfully placed its payload into a high-energy geostationary transfer orbit. Before the satellite had even separated from the second stage of Falcon 9, first stage 1042 had already successfully landed aboard SpaceX’s East coast drone ship OCISLY. The floating landing pad extinguished a small fire that was seen creeping up the booster.
Barely 72 hours later, the drone ship and its Falcon 9 cargo arrived back at Port Canaveral, docking soon after. Launch photographer Tom Cross was on scene to capture the booster’s return home.

In a wonderful coincidence, Tom was able to photograph the rocket at dawn before it launched, and later at dusk as it arrived aboard OCISLY. (Tom Cross/Teslarati)

Falcon 9 1042 arrived at Port Canaveral on the evening of November 2nd, and was welcomed home with a beautiful Floridan sunset. (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
Closeup shots serve as evidence of booster 1042’s apparent burn trauma, although it is almost certainly worse than it looks. A number of common operations follow each booster landing, and one of the most important sequences involves emptying residual propellant and depressurizing the rocket’s fuel tanks. This is accompanied by the expulsion of remaining TEA-TAB reserves, a volatile compound used to ignite Falcon 9’s Merlin 1D engines during launch and recovery. TEA-TAB is pyrophoric, meaning it spontaneously catches fire when exposed to your run of the mill air, a decidedly human-unfriendly feature. The fires that occur after successful landings are thus best described as intentional and (mostly) controlled, and SpaceX’s drone ships are equipped with water guns in the event that things get a bit too spicy.
- What a beautiful day for a rocket landing! (SpaceX)
- 1042’s propellant purge became increasingly toasty… (SpaceX)
- And the booster finally got some respite from the fire, thanks to OCISLY’s water gun. (SpaceX)
Despite the small fire, the booster looks to be in great condition.
- Koreasat 5A was a relatively small payload and thus Falcon 9 1042 is likely in decent condition. (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
- The faded soot on the lower right of the booster is the only evidence of the fire captured during the livestream. (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
- (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
- (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
Tom waited patiently as the the sun set and tugboats swarmed to dock the unwieldy drone ship. The dock’s powerful night lights came into full effect and provided an opportunity for some final beauty shots of the gritty booster and industrial surroundings.
- (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
- (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
- (Tom Cross/Teslarati)
After a brief nap aboard OCISLY, SpaceX’s recovery crew wasted no time craning the toasty Falcon 9 core onto dry land, where workers began removing landing legs to prepare the rocket for transport.
Another landing leg removed. It appears that this might the 4th one to come off. pic.twitter.com/QSYdlAR4NQ
— Nathan Barker (@NASA_Nerd) November 3, 2017
SpaceX is clearly building confidence with their recovery procedures, and 1042’s journey has been exceptionally fast and efficient. With 19 successful recoveries now under the company’s belt, the company’s growing expertise is readily apparent, and the clockwork-like nature of their refined processes will benefit SpaceX immensely as it pursues ever-higher launch cadences. With multiple major SpaceX customers expressing newfound interest in reused rockets in the last two weeks alone, the demand for recovered boosters will likely continue to grow, and every successful recovery and commercial reuse is a concrete step along the path to rapid and complete reuse.
News
Tesla Cybercab spotted with interesting charging solution, stimulating discussion
The port is located in the rear of the vehicle and features a manual door and latch for plug-in, and the video shows an employee connecting to a Tesla Supercharger.
Tesla Cybercab units are being tested publicly on roads throughout various areas of the United States, and a recent sighting of the vehicle’s charging port has certainly stimulated some discussions throughout the community.
The Cybercab is geared toward being a fully-autonomous vehicle, void of a steering wheel or pedals, only operating with the use of the Full Self-Driving suite. Everything from the driving itself to the charging to the cleaning is intended to be operated autonomously.
But a recent sighting of the vehicle has incited some speculation as to whether the vehicle might have some manual features, which would make sense, but let’s take a look:
🚨 Tesla Cybercab charging port is in the rear of the vehicle!
Here’s a great look at plugging it in!!
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) January 29, 2026
The port is located in the rear of the vehicle and features a manual door and latch for plug-in, and the video shows an employee connecting to a Tesla Supercharger.
Now, it is important to remember these are prototype vehicles, and not the final product. Additionally, Tesla has said it plans to introduce wireless induction charging in the future, but it is not currently available, so these units need to have some ability to charge.
However, there are some arguments for a charging system like this, especially as the operation of the Cybercab begins after production starts, which is scheduled for April.
Wireless for Operation, Wired for Downtime
It seems ideal to use induction charging when the Cybercab is in operation. As it is for most Tesla owners taking roadtrips, Supercharging stops are only a few minutes long for the most part.
The Cybercab would benefit from more frequent Supercharging stops in between rides while it is operating a ride-sharing program.
Tesla wireless charging patent revealed ahead of Robotaxi unveiling event
However, when the vehicle rolls back to its hub for cleaning and maintenance, standard charging, where it is plugged into a charger of some kind, seems more ideal.
In the 45-minutes that the car is being cleaned and is having maintenance, it could be fully charged and ready for another full shift of rides, grabbing a few miles of range with induction charging when it’s out and about.
Induction Charging Challenges
Induction charging is still something that presents many challenges for companies that use it for anything, including things as trivial as charging cell phones.
While it is convenient, a lot of the charge is lost during heat transfer, which is something that is common with wireless charging solutions. Even in Teslas, the wireless charging mat present in its vehicles has been a common complaint among owners, so much so that the company recently included a feature to turn them off.
Production Timing and Potential Challenges
With Tesla planning to begin Cybercab production in April, the real challenge with the induction charging is whether the company can develop an effective wireless apparatus in that short time frame.
It has been in development for several years, but solving the issue with heat and energy loss is something that is not an easy task.
In the short-term, Tesla could utilize this port for normal Supercharging operation on the Cybercab. Eventually, it could be phased out as induction charging proves to be a more effective and convenient option.
News
Tesla confirms that it finally solved its 4680 battery’s dry cathode process
The suggests the company has finally resolved one of the most challenging aspects of its next-generation battery cells.
Tesla has confirmed that it is now producing both the anode and cathode of its 4680 battery cells using a dry-electrode process, marking a key breakthrough in a technology the company has been working to industrialize for years.
The update, disclosed in Tesla’s Q4 and FY 2025 update letter, suggests the company has finally resolved one of the most challenging aspects of its next-generation battery cells.
Dry cathode 4680 cells
In its Q4 and FY 2025 update letter, Tesla stated that it is now producing 4680 cells whose anode and cathode were produced during the dry electrode process. The confirmation addresses long-standing questions around whether Tesla could bring its dry cathode process into sustained production.
The disclosure was highlighted on X by Bonne Eggleston, Tesla’s Vice President of 4680 batteries, who wrote that “both electrodes use our dry process.”
Tesla first introduced the dry-electrode concept during its Battery Day presentation in 2020, pitching it as a way to simplify production, reduce factory footprint, lower costs, and improve energy density. While Tesla has been producing 4680 cells for some time, the company had previously relied on more conventional approaches for parts of the process, leading to questions about whether a full dry-electrode process could even be achieved.
4680 packs for Model Y
Tesla also revealed in its Q4 and FY 2025 Update Letter that it has begun producing battery packs for certain Model Y vehicles using its in-house 4680 cells. As per Tesla:Â
“We have begun to produce battery packs for certain Model Ys with our 4680 cells, unlocking an additional vector of supply to help navigate increasingly complex supply chain challenges caused by trade barriers and tariff risks.”
The timing is notable. With Tesla preparing to wind down Model S and Model X production, the Model Y and Model 3 are expected to account for an even larger share of the company’s vehicle output. Ensuring that the Model Y can be equipped with domestically produced 4680 battery packs gives Tesla greater flexibility to maintain production volumes in the United States, even as global battery supply chains face increasing complexity.
Elon Musk
Tesla Giga Texas to feature massive Optimus V4 production line
This suggests that while the first Optimus line will be set up in the Fremont Factory, the real ramp of Optimus’ production will happen in Giga Texas.
Tesla will build Optimus 4 in Giga Texas, and its production line will be massive. This was, at least, as per recent comments by CEO Elon Musk on social media platform X.
Optimus 4 production
In response to a post on X which expressed surprise that Optimus will be produced in California, Musk stated that “Optimus 4 will be built in Texas at much higher volume.” This suggests that while the first Optimus line will be set up in the Fremont Factory, and while the line itself will be capable of producing 1 million humanoid robots per year, the real ramp of Optimus’ production will happen in Giga Texas.Â
This was not the first time that Elon Musk shared his plans for Optimus’ production at Gigafactory Texas. During the 2025 Annual Shareholder Meeting, he stated that Giga Texas’ Optimus line will produce 10 million units of the humanoid robot per year. He did not, however, state at the time that Giga Texas would produce Optimus V4.Â
“So we’re going to launch on the fastest production ramp of any product of any large complex manufactured product ever, starting with building a one-million-unit production line in Fremont. And that’s Line one. And then a ten million unit per year production line here,” Musk stated.Â
How big Optimus could become
During Tesla’s Q4 and FY 2025 earnings call, Musk offered additional context on the potential of Optimus. While he stated that the ramp of Optimus’ production will be deliberate at first, the humanoid robot itself will have the potential to change the world.Â
“Optimus really will be a general-purpose robot that can learn by observing human behavior. You can demonstrate a task or verbally describe a task or show it a task. Even show it a video, it will be able to do that task. It’s going to be a very capable robot. I think long-term Optimus will have a very significant impact on the US GDP.
“It will actually move the needle on US GDP significantly. In conclusion, there are still many who doubt our ambitions for creating amazing abundance. We are confident it can be done, and we are making the right moves technologically to ensure that it does. Tesla, Inc. has never been a company to shy away from solving the hardest problems,” Musk stated.









