Connect with us

News

Tesla Model S fleet helps Uber show its green side in Madrid

Published

on

In the hopes of romancing the environmentally-conscious government in Madrid, Uber has chosen the Tesla Model S for its fleet in a definitive shift to electric cars. The program, titled UberONE, comes as Uber continues to be shut down or sanctioned in cities across the globe due to the company’s pattern of circumventing local and regional regulations. UberONE will be a carbon reducing alternative to its other Madrid delivery service, called UberX.

Madrid is led by Mayor Manuela Carmena, who is committed to a sustainable future. Luis Cueto, Madrid City Hall’s Chief Coordinator, was on hand for the Tesla Model S fleet launch. In reaction to its significant struggles with car pollution, the city issued new measures to reduce carbon emissions in November. These included reducing most private vehicular traffic in the city center and strengthening access road speed limits. Seeing the green writing on the wall, Uber decided to introduce clean cars within its fleet to improve its image in the region. “We want to do things that are in line with what the town hall wants,” admitted Carles Lloret, managing director of Uber for southern Europe. “UberONE is another step towards a more sustainable Madrid” with a new company emphasis on alternative means of transport.

The Tesla Model S, a high-performance, long-range electric vehicle that costs around €77,000, began service with UberONE on December 22. Passengers have internet access from a Microsoft Surface Pro 4 tablet as well as access to the music and podcasting service, Spotify. With airport destination ride costs generally between €30 and €32, Madrid UberONE passengers spend a comparable amount to a traditional taxi service. In a calculated move, with a target audience of business executives, UberONE hopes the luxurious, environmentally-friendly choice will become a niche transportation market in Spain.

“Madrid is the ideal city to launch this pioneering service,” Lloret allowed. UberONE says that it guarantees technically sound and insured cars and drivers who are fully licensed to carry passengers. Additionally, drivers must be registered as either self-employed or as a company and be checked for previous traffic offenses. This differs from previous Uber policies that, according to a Spanish judge in 2014, were contrary to the country’s laws and represented unfair competition. At that time, Uber was prevented from conducting business on Spanish roads. UberX was legally permitted in Madrid in April, as it used professionally licensed drivers.

Uber has faced court injunctions in several other countries, including Belgium, France, Germany. and the Netherlands, although it is available in 557 cities around the world. Uber hopes the Tesla Model S fleet will encourage a more welcoming approach from Madrid’s government. “We want to do things that are in line with what the town hall wants,” Lloret said. “We would love to see more licenses awarded in the future, perhaps for greener cars, so there could be more in circulation.”

Advertisement

Source: El Pais

Carolyn Fortuna is a writer and researcher with a Ph.D. in education from the University of Rhode Island. She brings a social justice perspective to environmental issues. Please follow me on Twitter and Facebook and Google+

Advertisement
Comments

News

Tesla gets another NHTSA probe, this time related to door handles

“Although Tesla vehicles have manual door releases inside of the cabin, in these situations, a child may not be able to access or operate the releases even if the vehicle’s driver is aware of them.”

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla is facing another investigation into its vehicles by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), this time related to an issue with its door handles.

In a new Open Investigation named “Electronic door handles become inoperative,” the NHTSA says that it has received nine complaints from owners of the 2021 Tesla Model Y stemming from “an inability to open doors.”

These issues were reported after “parents exited their vehicle after a drive cycle in order to remove a child from the pack seat or placing a child in the back seat before starting a drive cycle.” Parents said they were “unable to reopen a door to regain access to the vehicle.”

Tesla door handles become unlikely hero as they stump road rager

Four of the nine complaints ended with having to break a window to regain access to the cabin.

Advertisement

The NHTSA goes on to explain that, while Teslas do have a manual door release inside the cabin, a child may not be able to access it:

“Although Tesla vehicles have manual door releases inside of the cabin, in these situations, a child may not be able to access or operate the releases even if the vehicle’s driver is aware of them. As a result, in these instances, an occupant who remains inside a vehicle in this condition may be unable to be rapidly retrieved by persons outside of the vehicle.”

Advertisement

It appears that the agency is attributing the issue to a low voltage in the vehicle’s 12V DC battery. This would mean there needs to be some sort of notification to the driver that the battery is running low on power and should be replaced to avoid this issue.

The NHTSA estimates that 174,290 vehicles are potentially impacted by this issue. It plans to assess the scope and severity of the condition, the agency says. The NHTSA also wants to see what approach Tesla uses to supply power to door locks and the reliability of the applicable power supplies.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla won’t implement strange Grok character as Musk dispels rumor

It is nice to see that Tesla is not forcing this kind of character upon owners of their vehicles, especially considering that many people had a real problem with it.

Published

on

Tesla is not going to implement a strange character as a Grok assistant in its vehicles, as CEO Elon Musk dispelled the rumor, which seemed to truly invoke some quite polarizing reactions.

Yesterday, there was some controversy within the Tesla community as rumors of a Grok assistant, named Mūn (pronounced like Moon), being implemented into the vehicles started to circulate.

It had some legitimacy. It was initially posted by an employee, and it appeared to be a relatively confirmed development.

However, it really did rub some people the wrong way. Mūn was an Anime-style female dressed in promiscuous clothing, so it was not everyone’s style, and I’m sure not everyone’s significant other’s cup of tea. It seemed a very strange decision to add it, especially considering that, at the time, there was no confirmation to dispel the arrival of the Grok assistant.

That was until Tesla CEO Elon Musk stepped in to put the speculation to bed once and for all.

Advertisement

It was somewhat strange that this type of issue arose in the first place, but given that it was initially released by an employee, the entire situation is self-explanatory.

It is nice to see that Tesla is not forcing this kind of character upon owners of their vehicles, especially considering that many people had a real problem with it. Many owners did not shy away from the fact that they would like the option to opt out:

For now, Grok remains a part of Tesla vehicles, and personally, it is very nice to have in my Model Y to answer some quick questions I might have or even to entertain some people in the car.

Nevertheless, I am relieved I won’t have this character forced upon me in my vehicle.

Continue Reading

News

U.S. Judge dismisses lawsuit against SpaceX Starship Boca Chica launch site

The ruling found that the FAA had met its obligations in reviewing the potential environmental effects of Starship launches.

Published

on

(Credit: SpaceX)

A U.S. district court judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by conservation groups challenging the Federal Aviation Administration’s approval of SpaceX’s expanded rocket launch operations in Boca Chica, Texas. 

The ruling, issued Monday, found that the FAA had met its obligations in reviewing the potential environmental effects of Starship launches.

FAA review withstands legal challenge

The lawsuit centered on whether the FAA properly assessed the impact of SpaceX’s operations on endangered wildlife, including ocelots, jaguarundis, and Kemp’s Ridley sea turtles, as noted in a report from The Guardian. The plaintiffs argued that noise, light pollution, and construction activity degraded the surrounding habitat, which also serves as nesting grounds for threatened shorebirds.

The lawsuit cited SpaceX’s April 2023 Starship test, which destroyed its launchpad and scattered debris across a large area. The blast reportedly ignited a grassfire and damaged wildlife habitats, including a bobwhite quail nest.

Judge Carl Nichols, for his part, ruled that the FAA had satisfied its obligation“to take a hard look at the effects of light on nearby wildlife.” The decision effectively cleared a regulatory hurdle for SpaceX, which has been working to expand Starship launch activity at its Boca Chica facility.

Advertisement

A continued ramp

SpaceX continues to scale its operations nationwide. Beyond Starship, the company is also seeking approval to nearly double Falcon rocket launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California, from 50 annually to 95. 

Former President Trump has also shared his intention to increase U.S. launch capacity, setting a target for substantial growth by 2030. Considering that SpaceX is by far the world’s dominant launch provider, Trump’s support for more launches will likely benefit the private space company.

For now, at least, the ruling should allow continued expansion at a time when Starship remains central to long-term goals such as Mars missions and NASA’s Artemis program.

Continue Reading

Trending