News
Tesla Giga Nevada images hint at potential mobile “Megacharger” solution
New images from Giga Nevada suggest that Tesla may be looking to develop a mobile “Megacharger” system for the upcoming Class 8 all-electric Semi. The system seems to be powered by Powerpack batteries.
To clarify, the “Megacharger” is the name of the Semi’s charging infrastructure, as mentioned by CEO Elon Musk during the vehicle’s unveiling in late 2017. Pictures shared with Teslarati show Tesla’s progress with the buildout of Megachargers at Giga Nevada–and maybe a little more. There are a least two Megachargers at the Gigafactory, and Tesla might install more in the future, especially as the Semi’s limited production starts rolling.
However, right behind the Megachargers is a trailer with four Tesla Powerpacks and two urban charger stalls. According to Teslarati’s source, there were two trailers at Giga Nevada, and one of the trailers was fitted with Tesla Powerpacks, which may hint at a potential portable charging system.
-
- (Credit: Jason Colepaugh)
-
- (Credit: Jason Colepaugh)
Tesla’s Mobile Charger Solutions
Tesla has deployed mobile EV charging systems in the past. In 2019, Tesla deployed mobile Superchargers powered by Megapacks for the holidays. It was a simple and practical solution to increase the number of charger stalls at select Supercharger stations quickly and efficiently. Reports then indicated that the Megapack-powered mobile Superchargers could charge about 60-100 vehicles thanks to the Megapack’s 3 MWh capacity.
Mobile “Megachargers” would be a practical move for Tesla and the Semi’s clients. Mobile “Megachargers” could help top-up Semis in popular transport routes while Tesla concentrates on growing its Supercharger Network and the Semi’s dedicated charging infrastructure. Mobile “Megachargers” could also be a cost-effective way for Tesla and the Semi’s clients to ensure that chargers are present for the Class 8 electric truck in locations where they are needed the most.
Tesla deploys Megapack-powered Mobile Superchargers for the holidays
The Semi’s “Megacharger” Evolution
In 2018, a Tesla Semi prototype sighted in Des Moines, IA was spotted using an ad hoc “Megacharger” system that utilized 5 Supercharger V2 stalls. By 2020, sightings of the electric Class-8 revealed an updated ad hoc “Megacharger” solution that used only 2 Supercharger stalls. It was unknown whether the two stalls charging the Semi in 2020 were V2 or V3 Superchargers.
The trailer in the picture recently shared with Teslarati held two urban chargers, suggesting a potentially similar charging setup as the Semi prototype spotted in 2020. As for the use of Powerpacks instead of larger Megapacks, it might be down to cost.
Tesla Semi’s updated ad-hoc Megacharger setup hints at vastly improved battery unit
According to Elon Musk during a 2021 interview with noted podcast host Joe Rogan, the Semi’s 300-mile variant should be equipped with a battery pack that’s around 500 kWh. Previous estimates suggested that the Semi will be fitted with a 600 kWh battery pack for the 300-mile version and a 1 MWh battery pack for the 500-mile Semi variant.
One Megapack has a capacity of 3 MWh and costs about $1.2 million as of July 2021, when Tesla updated the Megapack’s order page. A single Megapack could potentially charge several Semis consecutively, but the costs for such a solution would be substantial. Considering that one Tesla Powerpack has a capacity of up to 232 kWh, four units of the commercial-grade battery would likely have about ~900 kWh of energy capacity. This would likely be enough to top up a couple of Semis at a time, without requiring the full costs of a Megapack-powered system.
The Teslarati team would appreciate hearing from you. If you have any tips, reach out to me at maria@teslarati.com or via Twitter @Writer_01001101.
News
Anti-Tesla union leader ditches X, urges use of Threads instead
Tesla Sweden and IF Metall have been engaged in a bitter dispute for over two years now.
Marie Nilsson, chair of Sweden’s IF Metall union and a prominent critic of Tesla, has left X and is urging audiences to follow the union on Meta’s Threads instead.
Tesla Sweden and IF Metall have been engaged in a bitter dispute for over two years now.
Anti-Tesla union leader exits X
In a comment to Dagens Arbete (DA), Nilsson noted that her exit from X is not formally tied to IF Metall’s long-running labor dispute with Tesla Sweden. Still, she stated that her departure is affected by changes to the platform under Elon Musk’s leadership.
“We have stayed because many journalists pick up news there. But as more and more people have left X, we have felt that the standard has now been reached on that platform,” she said.
Jesper Pettersson, press officer at IF Metall, highlighted that the union’s departure from X is only indirectly linked to Tesla Sweden and Elon Musk. “Indirectly it does, since there is a lot of evidence that his ownership has caused the change in the platform to be so significant.
“We have nevertheless assessed that the platform had value for reaching journalists, politicians and other opinion leaders. But it is a microscopic proportion of the public and our members who are there, and now that value has decreased,” Petterson added.
IF Metall sees Threads as an X alternative
After leaving X, IF Metall has begun using Threads, Meta’s alternative to the social media platform. The union described the move as experimental, noting that it is still evaluating how effective the platform will be for outreach and visibility.
Pettersson acknowledged that Meta also does not operate under Sweden’s collective bargaining model, but said the union sees little alternative if it wants to remain visible online.
“In a perfect world, all large international companies would be supporters of the Swedish model when they come here. But unfortunately, the reality is not like that. If we are to be visible at all in this social media world, we have to play by the rules of the game. The alternative would be to become completely invisible, and that would not benefit our members,” he said.
Despite many recent rumors and various reports, Elon Musk confirmed today that SpaceX is not developing a phone based on Starlink, not once, but twice.
Today’s report from Reuters cited people familiar with the matter and stated internal discussions have seen SpaceX executives mulling the idea of building a mobile device that would connect directly to the Starlink satellite constellation.
Musk did state in late January that SpaceX developing a phone was “not out of the question at some point.” However, He also said it would have to be a major difference from current phones, and would be optimized “purely for running max performance/watt neural nets.”
Not out of the question at some point. It would be a very different device than current phones. Optimized purely for running max performance/watt neural nets.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 30, 2026
While Musk said it was not out of the question “at some point,” that does not mean it is currently a project SpaceX is working on. The CEO reaffirmed this point twice on X this afternoon.
Musk said, “Reuters lies relentlessly,” in one post. In the next, he explicitly stated, “We are not developing a phone.”
Reuters lies relentlessly
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 5, 2026
We are not developing a phone
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 5, 2026
Musk has basically always maintained that SpaceX has too many things going on, denying that a phone would be in the realm of upcoming projects. There are too many things in the works for Musk’s space exploration company, most notably the recent merger with xAI.
SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise
A Starlink phone would be an excellent idea, especially considering that SpaceX operates 9,500 satellites, serving over 9 million users worldwide. 650 of those satellites are dedicated to the company’s direct-to-device initiative, which provides cellular coverage on a global scale.
Nevertheless, there is the potential that the Starlink phone eventually become a project SpaceX works on. However, it is not currently in the scope of what the company needs to develop, so things are more focused on that as of right now.
Tesla has added a notable improvement to its Dashcam feature after complaints from owners have pushed the company to make a drastic change.
Perhaps one of the biggest frustrations that Tesla owners have communicated regarding the Dashcam feature is the lack of ability to retain any more than 60 minutes of driving footage before it is overwritten.
It does not matter what size USB jump drive is plugged into the vehicle. 60 minutes is all it will hold until new footage takes over the old. This can cause some issues, especially if you were saving an impressive clip of Full Self-Driving or an incident on the road, which could be lost if new footage was recorded.
This has now been changed, as Tesla has shown in the Release Notes for an upcoming Software Update in China. It will likely expand to the U.S. market in the coming weeks, and was first noticed by NotaTeslaApp.
The release notes state:
“Dashcam Dynamic Recording Duration – The dashcam dynamically adjusts the recording duration based on the available storage capacity of the connected USB drive. For example, with a 128 GB USB drive, the maximum recording duration is approximately 3 hours; with a 1 TB or larger USB drive, it can reach up to 24 hours. This ensures that as much video as possible is retained for review before it gets overwritten.”
Tesla Adds Dynamic Recording
Instead of having a 60-minute cap, the new system will now go off the memory in the USB drive. This means with:
- 128 GB Jump Drive – Up to Three Hours of Rolling Footage
- 1TB Jump Drive – Up to 24 Hours of Rolling Footage
This is dependent on the amount of storage available on the jump drive, meaning that if there are other things saved on it, it will take away from the amount of footage that can be retained.
While the feature is just now making its way to employees in China, it will likely be at least several weeks before it makes its way to the U.S., but owners should definitely expect it in the coming months.
It will be a welcome feature, especially as there will now be more customization to the number of clips and their duration that can be stored.
Anti-Tesla union leader ditches X, urges use of Threads instead
Elon Musk confirms SpaceX is not developing a phone
