Connect with us

Investor's Corner

Tesla shareholder secures legal team to challenge plaintiff’s $5B fee request in Tornetta v Musk case

Credit: Tesla Asia/X

Published

on

Longtime Tesla shareholder Amy Steffens has secured legal counsel to challenge the plaintiff’s fee request in the Tornetta vs. Musk et al. case. The Tesla shareholder’s filing argued that the plaintiff’s fee request of more than $5.1 billion worth of TSLA stock is not just unjustifiable — it is harmful to regular shareholders of the electric vehicle maker. 

The Tornetta vs. Musk et al. case became a substantial issue for Tesla earlier this year when Judge Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery rescinded the CEO’s 2018 compensation plan. The Delaware Court’s decision practically voided Musk’s $55.8 billion compensation package, and in a filing, Tornetta’s legal team argued that they deserve over 29 million TSLA stock as their legal fees. 

As of TSLA stock’s close on Wednesday’s trading, Tornetta’s legal team’s request to be granted 29,402,900 shares of the electric vehicle maker would be worth more than $5.1 billion. Such an amount translates to an hourly rate of over $200,000.

The Tesla shareholder’s filing clarified a number of points that were seemingly assumed by the Delaware Court in its January 2024 Opinion. As per the filing, Ms. Steffens was fully informed about the terms and conditions of Elon Musk’s 2018 CEO Performance Award, and she was also equally informed about the relationship between the CEO and the members of Tesla’s Board of Directors. 

More importantly, the Tesla shareholder noted in her filing that she was fully aware back in 2018 that Musk’s compensation plan was incredibly ambitious, and he would only be compensated if the electric vehicle maker achieved then-unprecedented levels of success. Ms. Steffens also argued that even after reviewing the Court’s Opinion that rescinded Musk’s 2018 pay package, she still believes that the 2018 CEO Performance Award should have remained in place. 

Advertisement
-->

The Tesla shareholder has assembled a formidable legal team to challenge the plaintiff’s $5.1 billion fee request. They include Joseph A. Grundfest of Stanford Law School, a prominent expert in the fields of capital markets, corporate governance, and securities litigation; Donald B. Verrilli, Elaine J. Goldenberg, and Achyut Phadke, who are partners at the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson; and Anthony Rickey of Margrave Law LLC, who specializes in complex corporate and commercial cases. 

The Tesla shareholder’s filing (via Plainsite) opposing the plaintiff’s $5.1 billion fee request can be viewed below. 

gov.uscourts.delch.2018-0408-KSJM.354.0 by Simon Alvarez on Scribd

Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.

Advertisement
-->

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Investor's Corner

Tesla bear gets blunt with beliefs over company valuation

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla bear Michael Burry got blunt with his beliefs over the company’s valuation, which he called “ridiculously overvalued” in a newsletter to subscribers this past weekend.

“Tesla’s market capitalization is ridiculously overvalued today and has been for a good long time,” Burry, who was the inspiration for the movie The Big Shortand was portrayed by Christian Bale.

Burry went on to say, “As an aside, the Elon cult was all-in on electric cars until competition showed up, then all-in on autonomous driving until competition showed up, and now is all-in on robots — until competition shows up.”

Tesla bear Michael Burry ditches bet against $TSLA, says ‘media inflated’ the situation

For a long time, Burry has been skeptical of Tesla, its stock, and its CEO, Elon Musk, even placing a $530 million bet against shares several years ago. Eventually, Burry’s short position extended to other supporters of the company, including ARK Invest.

Tesla has long drawn skepticism from investors and more traditional analysts, who believe its valuation is overblown. However, the company is not traded as a traditional stock, something that other Wall Street firms have recognized.

While many believe the company has some serious pull as an automaker, an identity that helped it reach the valuation it has, Tesla has more than transformed into a robotics, AI, and self-driving play, pulling itself into the realm of some of the most recognizable stocks in tech.

Burry’s Scion Asset Management has put its money where its mouth is against Tesla stock on several occasions, but the firm has not yielded positive results, as shares have increased in value since 2020 by over 115 percent. The firm closed in May.

In 2020, it launched its short position, but by October 2021, it had ditched that position.

Tesla has had a tumultuous year on Wall Street, dipping significantly to around the $220 mark at one point. However, it rebounded significantly in September, climbing back up to the $400 region, as it currently trades at around $430.

It closed at $430.14 on Monday.

Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Mizuho keeps Tesla (TSLA) “Outperform” rating but lowers price target

As per the Mizuho analyst, upcoming changes to EV incentives in the U.S. and China could affect Tesla’s unit growth more than previously expected.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla China

Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) price target to $475 from $485, citing potential 2026 EV subsidy cuts in the U.S. and China that could pressure deliveries. The firm maintained its Outperform rating for the electric vehicle maker, however. 

As per the Mizuho analyst, upcoming changes to EV incentives in the U.S. and China could affect Tesla’s unit growth more than previously expected. The U.S. accounted for roughly 37% of Tesla’s third-quarter 2025 sales, while China represented about 34%, making both markets highly sensitive to policy shifts. Potential 50% cuts to Chinese subsidies and reduced U.S. incentives affected the firm’s outlook.

With those pressures factored in, the firm now expects Tesla to deliver 1.75 million vehicles in 2026 and 2 million in 2027, slightly below consensus estimates of 1.82 million and 2.15 million, respectively. The analyst was cautiously optimistic, as near-term pressure from subsidies is there, but the company’s long-term tech roadmap remains very compelling. 

Despite the revised target, Mizuho remained optimistic on Tesla’s long-term technology roadmap. The firm highlighted three major growth drivers into 2027: the broader adoption of Full Self-Driving V14, the expansion of Tesla’s Robotaxi service, and the commercialization of Optimus, the company’s humanoid robot. 

“We are lowering TSLA Ests/PT to $475 with Potential BEV headwinds in 2026E. We believe into 2026E, US (~37% of TSLA 3Q25 sales) EV subsidy cuts and China (34% of TSLA 3Q25 sales) potential 50% EV subsidy cuts could be a headwind to EV deliveries. 

Advertisement
-->

“We are now estimating TSLA deliveries for 2026/27E at 1.75M/2.00M (slightly below cons. 1.82M/2.15M). We see some LT drivers with FSD v14 adoption for autonomous, robotaxi launches, and humanoid robots into 2027 driving strength,” the analyst noted. 

Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Tesla stock lands elusive ‘must own’ status from Wall Street firm

Published

on

Tesla model y with FSD Unsupervised at Giga Texas
Credit: Tesla AI | X

Tesla stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) has landed an elusive “must own” status from Wall Street firm Melius, according to a new note released early this week.

Analyst Rob Wertheimer said Tesla will lead the charge in world-changing tech, given the company’s focus on self-driving, autonomy, and Robotaxi. In a note to investors, Wertheimer said “the world is about to change, dramatically,” because of the advent of self-driving cars.

He looks at the industry and sees many potential players, but the firm says there will only be one true winner:

“Our point is not that Tesla is at risk, it’s that everybody else is.”

The major argument is that autonomy is nearing a tipping point where years of chipping away at the software and data needed to develop a sound, safe, and effective form of autonomous driving technology turn into an avalanche of progress.

Wertheimer believes autonomy is a $7 trillion sector,” and in the coming years, investors will see “hundreds of billions in value shift to Tesla.”

A lot of the major growth has to do with the all-too-common “butts in seats” strategy, as Wertheimer believes that only a fraction of people in the United States have ridden in a self-driving car. In Tesla’s regard, only “tens of thousands” have tried Tesla’s latest Full Self-Driving (Supervised) version, which is v14.

Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.2 – Full Review, the Good and the Bad

When it reaches a widespread rollout and more people are able to experience Tesla Full Self-Driving v14, he believes “it will shock most people.”

Citing things like Tesla’s massive data pool from its vehicles, as well as its shift to end-to-end neural nets in 2021 and 2022, as well as the upcoming AI5 chip, which will be put into a handful of vehicles next year, but will reach a wider rollout in 2027, Melius believes many investors are not aware of the pace of advancement in self-driving.

Tesla’s lead in its self-driving efforts is expanding, Wertheimer says. The company is making strategic choices on everything from hardware to software, manufacturing, and overall vehicle design. He says Tesla has left legacy automakers struggling to keep pace as they still rely on outdated architectures and fragmented supplier systems.

Tesla shares are up over 6 percent at 10:40 a.m. on the East Coast, trading at around $416.

Continue Reading