News
Tesla Sweden vs IF Metall Strike Recap: sympathy strikes, lawsuits & more [Editorial]
Tesla Sweden and IF Metall conflict is hitting its third month, and a lot has happened since it began.
Tesla’s Lawsuits
IF Metall has gained a lot of support within Sweden from other trade unions, including Seko, which brought Postnord into the strike. Through Postnord, IF Metall struck Tesla with a big blow as the courier refused to deliver new license plates to the automaker. Postnord’s blockade on Tesla has affected the new vehicle deliveries.
In response, Tesla filed lawsuits against Postnord and the Swedish Transport Agency, which refuses to switch courier services. The automaker claims at least 1,000 new license plates are still not within its possession. Tesla and its customers recently found a loophole to Postnord’s blockade, enabling deliveries to continue.
However, IF Metall’s strike against Tesla continues. It has also gained support from other Nordic countries, leading Tesla to seek a government affairs specialist.
Tesla seeks Government Affairs Specialist for Nordic countries
Tesla Sweden posted a job position for a government affairs specialist amid the ongoing IF Metall Strike.
Tesla Sweden’s Job post reads:
“Tesla is seeking an all-round Stockholm- or Oslo-based Nordics public policy and business development manager to join its growing EMEA team. The role is to help ensure that the political, regulatory, and fiscal frameworks in the ‘Nordics’ (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland) support Tesla’s mission, especially by promoting a rapid transition to zero-emission surface transport and a safe and secure transition to assisted automated driving.”
Sympathy Strikes Against Tesla
IF Metall’s strike against Tesla, which started in October, has reached other Nordic countries like Denmark and Norway. The Swedish union has gained support through sympathy strikes by other trade unions and countries as opposed to Tesla employees working in Sweden.
Norway’s governing Labor Party summoned Tesla to parliament last week. The Texas-based automaker was called to parliament to answer questions about IF Metall’s ongoing strike. Tesla’s Norwegian boss, Axel Tangen, stated that the company follows Norwegian laws, including those related to the labor market.
Denmark and Norway have agreed to block Tesla shipments passing through their countries and heading to Sweden. A few Nordic pension funds have also put Tesla on its watchlist, closely observing how the situation with IF Metall will play out. One Danish pension fund, Pension Danmark, has put TSLA on its exclusion list. Other Nordic pension funds are approaching the conflict between Tesla Sweden and IF Metall with more caution.
Background
IF Metall’s strike against Tesla aims to push the automaker to sign a collective agreement, a standard contract between employers and unions in Sweden. Even if it is common in Sweden, collective agreements do not appear compulsory for a company. Tesla has refused to sign a collective agreement with IF Metall, clarifying that its payment scheme and treatment of workers are on par with, if not better than, those described in any contract with a union.
Opinion
If Tesla were to sign a collective agreement with IF Metall, it would only cover employees “within its contractual area” or those who are members of the Swedish union. Based on previous reports, IF Metall members usually exclude white-collar workers. Most IF Metall members at Tesla appear to be mechanics working at the automaker’s service centers.
Tesla Club Sweden recently conducted a count on how many mechanics actually supported IF Metall’s strike and came out with a total number of 13 workers. The Swedish union claims Tesla Club Sweden’s numbers are drastically underestimated.
The Teslarati team would appreciate hearing from you. If you have any tips, contact me at maria@teslarati.com or via X @Writer_01001101.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
