Investor's Corner
Tesla Q2 2018 earnings preview: Layoffs, auto revenue, cost of Model 3 ramp
All eyes will be on Tesla’s pace toward profitability on Wednesday, August 1 when the Silicon Valley company, led by CEO Elon Musk, releases its second quarter financial results after the closing bell. With the electric car maker meeting Musk’s self-imposed Model 3 weekly production target for the second quarter practically by the skin of its teeth, there is a good chance that Q2’s financial results will trigger even more volatility in Tesla’s stock (NASDAQ:TSLA). Here then, is a preview of what we can expect for Tesla’s Q2 2018 financial report and earnings call.
Automotive Deliveries and Revenue Impact
Tesla revealed Q2 deliveries totaling 40,740 vehicles, of which 18,440 were Model 3, 10,930 were Model S, and 11,370 were Model X when it released its production and delivery report earlier this month. Based on the company’s figures, the second quarter results are set to highlight the record deliveries for the Model 3, 10,000 more units compared to Q1. Charts displaying these could be viewed below, courtesy of Galileo Russell of YouTube’s HyperChange TV.
- Tesla’s vehicle deliveries. [Credit: Galileo Russell]
- Tesla’s Model 3 deliveries. [Credit: Galileo Russell]
Tesla posted revenue of $2.56B in Q1 for vehicle sales, including 8,182 Model 3s that were delivered to customers during the three-month period. Assuming that the additional 10,000 Model 3 delivered in Q2 averaged $55,000 per unit, Tesla could post an additional ~$550 million in earnings from the electric car. Revenue from Tesla’s vehicle leasing business likely remained flat considering that the lending option is not available yet for the Model 3. Service revenue could see a spike in Q2, however, as a result of more Model 3 vehicles being on the road.
The Price of the Model 3 Ramp
Tesla focused largely on the Model 3 ramp during Q2 2018, with the company pulling out all stops to hit its milestone of producing 5,000 Model 3 per week by the end of June. In order to achieve its target production rate, Tesla adopted unorthodox measures such as air-freighting robots and equipment from Europe and setting up an entirely new Model 3 assembly line on the grounds of the Fremont factory. These strategies likely resulted in additional expenses for the company in the second quarter. With the Model 3 ramp as a priority, Tesla’s other sources of income, such as its battery storage and solar business likely remained flat compared to Q1 as a result.
The company’s operational expenditure would likely see a slight bump in the second quarter due to the 9% layoffs that Tesla implemented to organize its workforce, considering that the restructuring included severance pay packages to employees who were terminated. In a video outlining his expectations for Tesla’s Q2 2018 results, the HyperChange TV host noted that he believes Tesla would post an estimated $4B in revenue with losses in the ~$500 million range. That’s a 43% increase in revenue compared to Q2 2017, when Tesla posted earnings of $2.8B, but also double the losses of the company’s losses in 2017’s second quarter.
Looking Past Q2’s Aftermath
Overall, Tesla’s Q2 2018 quarter financial results would likely feature similarities with Q1, in the way that the company would show strong growth but post substantial losses and negative cash flow. Nevertheless, it is pertinent to note that while Q2 2018’s numbers could be discouraging, the quarter could be seen as a turning point for Tesla, especially with regards to its Model 3 ramp. The past quarters, Q2 2018 included, have been focused on bringing the vehicle’s manufacturing up to 5,000 per week, resulting in the company investing heavily in resources to help scale the vehicle’s production.
With the 5,000/week milestone attained and with Tesla now more focused on sustaining its Model 3 production rate, Q3 2018 would most likely feature a pathway to profitability in the form of more encouraging financials than the second quarter. Provided that Tesla adopts a deliberate, realistic plan for the further ramp of the Model 3, the next few quarters could very well prove to be profitable.
Watch Galileo Russell’s take on Tesla’s Q2 2018 financial results in the video below.
Elon Musk
Tesla Cybercabs narrowly miss deadly Amazon cargo plane crash
An Amazon cargo plane crash near Miami’s airport stopped feet from dozens of Tesla Cybercabs.
An Amazon Prime Air Boeing 767 cargo jet overran the runway at Miami International Airport on Sunday afternoon, killing five people and injuring five more. The jet, operated by North Carolina based carrier 21 Air as Flight 7598, touched down around 2 p.m. after arriving from San Juan, Puerto Rico, then crossed the airport perimeter, plowed across NW 67th Avenue and struck multiple vehicles before catching fire, according to the Associated Press.
Photos and video from the scene show the aircraft’s nose stopped within meters of a fenced staging lot holding dozens of gold painted Tesla Cybercabs, the steering wheel free robotaxi Tesla began putting on public roads in Austin last week. Miami-Dade Fire Rescue has confirmed the plane struck “multiple vehicles” but has not said whether any Cybercabs were among them, and neither Tesla nor airport officials have addressed the fleet directly.
The Cybercabs had not yet entered commercial service in Miami. Tesla’s existing Robotaxi operation there runs on modified Model Y vehicles and has been unsupervised since Ashok Elluswamy confirmed the detail on X in July.
Footage of the plane crash from earlier today | #ONLYinDADE pic.twitter.com/iGoOtnd6cD
— ONLY in DADE (@ONLYinDADE) September 6, 2026
Elon Musk offered the briefest of reactions. Replying to a Zero Hedge post about the Cybercabs sitting so close to the wreckage, he wrote a single word: “Weird.” He has not commented further, and Tesla has not issued a statement.
The timing puts Tesla’s newest vehicle near an unrelated but highly visible tragedy just days after its Austin debut, a launch that had already drawn scrutiny from federal regulators. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an audit how Tesla certified the Cybercab as compliant with federal vehicle safety standards, a process Teslarati covered after the vehicle’s September 3 launch event. That inquiry concerns the car’s lack of a steering wheel and pedals, not the Miami crash.
Investigators from the FAA and NTSB are focused on the plane, not the parking lot beside it. Flight data reviewed by outlets including Simple Flying show the 767 touched down around 170 knots, well above the 135 to 140 knot range typical for the aircraft, though investigators have not determined a cause. Amazon said it is working with authorities and that its priority is the safety of everyone affected.
Whether any Cybercabs were damaged, and what Tesla plans for the fleet parked near one of the country’s busiest airports, remain open questions.
Featured
Tesla Cybercab is coming to Asia this month as US service officially begins
Tesla Asia says Cybercab will be on display in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing and Shanghai this month.
Tesla’s Cybercab is heading to Asia. The official Tesla Asia account posted on X Thursday, inviting Cybercab fans to “Come experience the future of autonomy in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing & Shanghai.” The post went up within hours of Tesla’s own Cybercab milestone in Texas, where the company said Thursday it had begun offering rides in across Austin.
Exact dates and venues for the Asia tour haven’t been released yet, though Tesla Hong Kong replied to the announcement with “Cybercab will be on display in Hong Kong soon,” while Tesla Japan’s response pointed fans to a sign up page for updates. Neither post mentions test rides or a service area, and nothing so far suggests Tesla is launching Robotaxi operations in any of the four cities. Based on how Tesla has run past Cybercab tours, in Europe in late 2024 and at US shopping centers that same December, the Asia stops are almost certainly static displays at Tesla stores or public venues as a means to stimulate buzz for its future driverless ride-hailing service in the big cities.
Cybercab will be on display in Asia this month!
Come experience the future of autonomy in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing & Shanghai. pic.twitter.com/wGmmEastfX— Tesla Asia (@Tesla_Asia) September 4, 2026
The timing lines up with Tesla’s only prior Cybercab appearance in the region, a booth at the China International Import Expo in Shanghai last November, which Teslarati covered at the time. At that event, Tesla’s regional general manager for Shanghai framed the car as evidence of the company’s broader mission, a message Tesla has since formalized in its Master Plan Part IV, which states that “autonomous vehicles have the capacity to dramatically improve the affordability, availability and safety of transportation while reducing pollution, particularly in our increasingly dense global cities.” The same document is where Tesla lays out its “sustainable abundance” framing for Cybercab and Optimus alike, describing the two as the hardware behind an AI driven push to cut the cost of transportation and labor at scale.
Whether Cybercab actually operates as a robotaxi anywhere in Asia remains an open question, considering China has already pushed an autonomous ride-hailing market that’s run on homegrown players like Baidu’s Apollo Go and Pony AI. For now, the four city tour reads as a marketing push timed to Austin’s momentum.
Elon Musk
OpenAI cites distrust of SpaceX in decision to drop Cursor partnership
OpenAI will cut SpaceX-owned Cursor’s model access in November, citing Musk’s history of broken contracts.
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, announced late Friday that it is ending its partnership with Cursor, cutting off the coding tool’s access to its models on November 12. The move comes two weeks after SpaceX completed its $60 billion acquisition of Cursor’s parent company, Anysphere, folding the popular AI coding assistant into Elon Musk’s growing SpaceXAI division.
In a post on its website, OpenAI said the decision came down to trust, not technology. “We cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk’s companies violating contracts,” the company wrote. OpenAI pointed to two specific incidents: X, now part of SpaceX, allegedly breaking the terms of an existing OpenAI contract after Musk bought Twitter.
That lawsuit is the backdrop for all of this. Musk cofounded OpenAI in 2015, left the board in 2018, and sued Sam Altman and Greg Brockman in 2024, arguing they abandoned the company’s nonprofit mission for profit. A federal jury sided with OpenAI in May, finding Musk waited too long to sue rather than ruling on the merits of his claims. Musk said at the time he would appeal to the Ninth Circuit, calling the outcome a “calendar technicality” rather than a real judgment.
SpaceX’s interest in Cursor predates that verdict by weeks. The company first struck a deal with Cursor in April, securing an option to acquire it for $60 billion or pay $10 billion for joint development work instead. As Teslarati reported at the time, the logic was straightforward: Cursor was paying retail prices to Anthropic and OpenAI, two of its most direct competitors, every time a developer used its product, while SpaceX had idle capacity on its Colossus supercomputer, roughly the equivalent of a million Nvidia H100 GPUs, that Cursor could use to train its own models instead. SpaceX exercised the option in June, days after its own IPO, and the deal closed in mid-August.
Once it closed, Musk moved fast. On an all-hands call with more than 1,000 Cursor employees, he reportedly told staff that SpaceXAI’s Grok was playing catchup in the AI race, unlike Tesla and SpaceX in their own markets, and singled out Anthropic as the company to catch. Cursor CEO Michael Truell now reports directly to Musk inside SpaceXAI.
Losing OpenAI’s models leaves Cursor leaning harder on Anthropic’s Claude, which has its own compute agreement with SpaceX, and on Cursor’s in-house Composer model, the one SpaceX’s compute was supposed to accelerate in the first place. OpenAI framed the November deadline as maximum notice under its contract, and said it wants to “go above and beyond” to help developers through the transition. Whether Anthropic makes the same call is now the open question in AI coding.

