

News
BMW’s next CEO could revive an electric car initiative amid assault from EVs like Tesla
BMW CEO Harald Krueger is leaving his post as the German automaker’s chief executive. In an update on Friday, the company announced that Krueger would not be seeking another term in his contract as CEO after it expires next year. A press release from BMW noted that the Supervisory Board will be discussing Krueger’s replacement during a meeting on July 18, though a report from the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper, citing people from within the company, claimed that production chief Oliver Zipse is the frontrunner to take over the CEO role.
This would likely translate to a potential revival, or at least an acceleration, of BMW’s push into electric mobility. Krueger has received a fair amount of skepticism over his leadership of BMW over the past years, particularly due to the company losing ground in the luxury segment to its main rival, Daimler’s Mercedes-Benz, according to the Associated Press. BMW has also been left out in the premium electric vehicle market, which is currently being dominated by Silicon Valley-based Tesla and increasingly populated by veteran carmakers like Audi and Jaguar. This was unfortunate, as BMW, at one point, actually had a lead in EVs.
Prior to Krueger’s appointment as CEO, BMW had launched the i3, a curiously-designed battery electric car that was considered as an alternative, or even a competitor, to the Tesla Model S. Under Krueger’s leadership, BMW shifted away from all-electric vehicles, focusing instead on plug-in hybrids, which combine an internal combustion engine and an electric motor. This strategy ultimately resulted in BMW losing the lead that it established with the i3. Today, the company’s next expected EV, the iX3, has been beaten to the market by the Jaguar I-PACE, the Audi-e-tron, and even the Porsche Taycan, which is set for release later this year.
Leading up to Friday’s announcement about Krueger’s departure, BMW insiders have mentioned to German news agency Handelsblatt that the company is considering two candidates who could take over the CEO post: the ambitious Head of Development Klaus Fröhlich and the more tempered Oliver Zipse, who took over BMW’s production department from Krueger back in 2015. Fröhlich is more aggressive than the head of production, but he is also a staunch electric car critic. Back in October, for example, Fröhlich committed to diesel, arguing that ongoing discussions about electromobility are “a little bit irrational.”
Fröhlich’s more recent comments showed an even more dismissive stance on electric cars. In a round table interview in Munich, the BMW executive argued that “there is no customer requests for BEVs.” Doubling down, he added that “If we have a big offer, a big incentive, we could flood Europe and sell a million cars, but Europeans won’t buy these things. Customers in Europe do not buy EVs. We pressed these cars into the market, and they’re not wanted. We can deliver an electrified vehicle to each person, but they will not buy them.”
Zipse, provided that he does get named as CEO, would have a lot of responsibilities on his shoulders. BMW is currently facing headwinds, including a “hiring freeze” and stagnating sales. The company has also issued two profit warnings over the past nine months, suggesting that it will take much effort to turn the automaker around. Rivals Volkswagen and Daimler have already gone ahead with their electric cars such as the ID.3, Audi e-tron, Porsche Taycan, and the Mercedes-Benz EQC. Tesla still holds a notable lead in key metrics such as batteries, efficiency, and charging infrastructure, but with a new captain at the helm, perhaps BMW can start catching up to the Silicon Valley-based electric car maker as well. If there’s anything that Tesla has proven over the years, after all, it is that the demand for well-designed, high-performance electric vehicles is notable, as could be seen in the disruption being caused by the Model 3 in markets such as the United States.
News
Tesla lands permission to test Full Self-Driving in new country

Tesla has landed permission to begin testing its Full Self-Driving suite in a new country: Sweden.
Tesla has been working to expand its Full Self-Driving suite across the world. Currently, it is available in seven countries: the United States, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Australia, New Zealand, and China, where it is referred to as “City Autopilot.”
Capabilities of the Full Self-Driving suite differ in each region based on the approvals given to Tesla by regulatory agencies.
In Europe, Tesla has been attempting for a long time to launch FSD in various countries, but regulatory red tape has been prolonging the company’s ability to launch the suite.
However, Sweden appears to be ready to allow Tesla to test FSD in some passenger and public locations, according to the country’s Transport Agency.
On X, a Swedish Tesla owner named Alexander Kristensen, says he received direct confirmation from the Transport Agency that Tesla has “received permission to test automated vehicles.”
Tesla got approval to test FSD in Sweden!
According to the Swedish Transport Administration, Tesla received approval to test FSD on all state highways and expressways in Sweden. The approval is valid for 3 cars owned by Tesla. pic.twitter.com/EVVPZZRpcs
— Alexander Kristensen (@LinkN01) October 9, 2025
The full email said:
“Tesla received permission to test automated vehicles last week. This includes three vehicles and all state highways and expressways in Sweden.”
— Alexander Kristensen (@LinkN01) October 9, 2025
Tesla has already been working with the Swedish Transport Agency on the first steps of Full Self-Driving’s approval. The company and the Transport Agency spent two weeks assessing data gathered during a Formal Site Assessment Test, or SAT.
Based on the communication from the Transport Agency to Kristensen, it appears the company has passed the SAT and will now be able to perform its own testing within the market.
This approval seems similar to the approval Tesla received in U.S. states for Robotaxi operation. Nevada and Arizona have both given Tesla approval for Robotaxi testing, but passengers are not allowed in the vehicles quite yet.
Instead, company employees perform the testing, which is likely what will go on in Sweden until the Transport Agency gives the company a green light to roll FSD software out to customers.
News
My Tesla did this on FSD (Supervised) v14.1 and the internet went crazy

My Tesla did something on Full Self-Driving (Supervised) v14.1, and it garnered quite the response from the internet.
I received access to Tesla’s FSD v14.1 on Tuesday night, and by Wednesday, I was already using it and seeing all the progress the company had made from v13.2.9.
Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.1 first impressions: Robotaxi-like features arrive
However, there was one thing that it did during the drive that I shared on our social media accounts, and it really got a lot of interesting reactions from people from all corners of the world.
I’ll give some background about the situation: I was driving on Main Street in Dallastown, PA, and the route was about to take me left onto Pleasant Avenue. It is a tight and usually very congested intersection; Main Street is a popular route for many construction vehicles and even some tractor-trailers.
It is a pretty tight intersection for full-size trucks and larger passenger vehicles. It is not super tight for my Model Y, but it gets to feel congested at times, including with what happened yesterday.
The light when I approached the intersection was a green yield; there was also a solid green arrow at the beginning of my light cycle, but I had arrived after that had already turned into the green yield. Oncoming traffic had a green light.
My Model Y got out into the middle of the intersection, and the light turned yellow, then red. Most people, including myself, would have probably made the left turn after the light turned red since the car was already out in the intersection.
The Tesla, using FSD v14.1, did not. Instead, it chose to back up to the “Stop Here on Red” line, which is further back due to the tight turn the perpendicular traffic has:
🚨 Super cool thing Tesla FSD v14.1 did: it proceeded thru this intersection to turn left, but the light had gone to red before the turn could be completed.
It put itself in reverse and backed up to the “Stop Here on Red” sign/line. Didn’t proceed at a red or impede others. pic.twitter.com/AKb1AI32fK
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) October 8, 2025
As I mentioned, I would have probably taken the left turn. However, I believe the Tesla did not see the traffic that sat to the left, and because of this, it weighed the turn as a higher probability of an accident than if it were to just back up to the line.
If you look at these two screenshots from when the light was yellow and red, Tesla’s driver visualization does not have any idea what traffic is to the left on Pleasant Avenue:
I believe that, since FSD could not tell what traffic was down to the left, it chose to reverse.
People had some polarizing opinions on it:
Tesla self-driving can reverse to get out of potentially dangerous positions. https://t.co/sxslalqphL
— Ashok Elluswamy (@aelluswamy) October 8, 2025
is it not legal to wait in the intersection to turn? I’ve always done that and turned after it goes red if needed
— wadu (@waduhekwaduhek2) October 8, 2025
WOW okay that is impressive ! And did it with good speed
— Ryan’s Model Y (@ryanjaycowan) October 8, 2025
Impressive that it has this capability, but it’s not the correct move. Green, yellow, red only dictate when you can enter the intersection, once you are in the intersection you must complete your maneuver, not back up. There are plenty of intersections where you HAVE to make the…
— doyouwanttoknow? (@climateyupa) October 8, 2025
As far as the legality of the move, it does not seem to be against Pennsylvania law to go through or choose to back up. I have seen many cars do both things over the course of my life of driving in this state, and neither has ever gotten anyone a ticket.
I think FSD just did what it felt was the safer option here.
News
NHTSA probes 2.9 million Tesla vehicles over reports of FSD traffic violations
The agency said FSD may have “induced vehicle behavior that violated traffic safety laws.”

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has opened an investigation into nearly 2.9 million Tesla vehicles over potential traffic-safety violations linked to the use of the company’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system.
The agency said FSD may have “induced vehicle behavior that violated traffic safety laws,” citing reports of Teslas running red lights or traveling in the wrong direction during lane changes.
As per the NHTSA, it has six reports in which a Tesla with FSD engaged “approached an intersection with a red traffic signal, continued to travel into the intersection against the red light and was subsequently involved in a crash with other motor vehicles in the intersection.” Four of these crashes reportedly resulted in one or more major injuries.
The agency also listed 18 complaints and one media report which alleged that a Tesla operating with FSD engaged “failed to remain stopped for the duration of a red traffic signal, failed to stop fully, or failed to accurately detect and display the correct traffic signal state in the vehicle interface.”
Some complainants also alleged that FSD “did not provide warnings of the system’s intended behavior as the vehicle was approaching a red traffic signal,” as noted in a Reuters report.
Tesla has not commented on the investigation, which remains in the preliminary phase. However, any potential recall could prove complicated since the reported incidents likely involved the use of older FSD (Supervised) versions that have already been updated.
Tesla’s recent FSD (Supervised) V14.1 update, which is currently rolling out to drivers, is expected to feature significantly improved lane management, intersection handling, and overall driving accuracy, reducing the chances of similar violations. It should also be noted that Tesla maintains that FSD is a supervised system for now, and thus, is not autonomous yet.
While autonomous systems face scrutiny, NHTSA’s own data highlights a much larger danger on the road from human error. The agency recorded 3,275 deaths in 2023 caused by distracted driving due to activities like texting, talking, or adjusting navigation while operating a vehicle manually. It is also widely believed that a good number of traffic violations are unreported due to their frequency and ubiquity.
-
Elon Musk2 weeks ago
Tesla FSD V14 set for early wide release next week: Elon Musk
-
News2 weeks ago
Elon Musk gives update on Tesla Optimus progress
-
News2 weeks ago
Tesla has a new first with its Supercharger network
-
News2 weeks ago
Tesla job postings seem to show next surprise market entry
-
Investor's Corner2 weeks ago
Tesla gets new Street-high price target with high hopes for autonomy domination
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
500-mile test proves why Tesla Model Y still humiliates rivals in Europe
-
News1 week ago
Tesla Giga Berlin’s water consumption has achieved the unthinkable
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
Tesla Model S Plaid battles China’s 1500 hp monster Nurburgring monster, with surprising results