

News
Porsche teases Taycan trim levels, over $130,000 price for “Turbo” variant
Porsche is expected to start the production of the Taycan, its first all-electric car, sometime in 2019. As the carmaker prepares to dip its feet into the premium EV market, some details about the upcoming vehicle are now starting to emerge. Take, for one, the names of the Taycan’s trim levels, as well as their corresponding price range.
Auto journalist Alex Roy recently shared a message he received from a Porsche Global Brand Ambassador as a response to an inquiry about the Taycan. As noted by the journalist, Porsche appears to be adopting a rather unique naming scheme for its Tesla Model S rival, particularly for the vehicle’s top trim.
Following is an excerpt from Porsche’s message to the journalist.
“I am following up on your inquiry on the upcoming Porsche Taycan. We are expecting to see the new model in about one year from now. Porsche is going to build three models — the Taycan, the Taycan 4S, and (the) Taycan Turbo. Pricing will start in the low $90,000 for the Taycan, high $90,000 for the 4S, and over $130,000 for the Turbo before options.”
Immediately noticeable is Porsche’s use of the word “Turbo” to denote the high-performance version of the Taycan. Such a naming scheme is a bit unusual for an electric car, considering that the vehicle would not have a turbo per se. That said, Roy noted in an article on The Drive that Porsche does tend to use the “Turbo” brand as a means to distinguish a halo vehicle from other cars in its lineup.
Thus, as unusual as it might be, calling the top-tier electric car the Taycan Turbo might actually be a very strategic move for the German legacy carmaker. After all, using familiar terminology on the electric car could help the company’s dedicated fanbase be more open to Porsche’s transition towards electrified mobility. Apart from this, using the “Turbo” designation for the Taycan’s top trim also gives the impression that the vehicle is a flagship car — one that the company intends to support for years to come.
Pricing-wise, the Taycan appears to be starting at a price above the entry-level Tesla Model S 75D. If the information provided by the Porsche Global Brand Ambassador proves accurate, the entry-level Taycan will start roughly $12,000 more than the entry-level Model S, which starts at $78,000. The midrange Taycan 4S, though, appears to be directly aimed at the Model S 100D, which starts at $96,000 before incentives.
Quite interestingly, the Taycan Turbo’s $130,000 starting price actually undercuts the Model S P100D’s current $135,000 starting price. That said, if the specs that Porsche announced for the vehicle — such as a 0-60 mph time of 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 155 mph, and a range of 310 miles per charge — are true for the Taycan Turbo, the vehicle would be slower off the line and have a slightly shorter range than Tesla’s flagship performance sedan. This would make the Taycan Turbo’s specs, down to its proficiency on the track, more comparable to the Model 3 Performance, which starts at a far more affordable price of $64,000.
News
Tesla appears to have teased a long-awaited Model Y trim for a Friday launch
The company posted it with its Europe & Middle East account, and it appears to be a Model Y Performance, which has been spotted testing at the famed Nurburgring in Germany.

Tesla appears to have teased a long-awaited Model Y trim for a launch on Friday.
The company posted it with its Europe & Middle East account, and it appears to be a Model Y Performance, which has been spotted testing at the famed Nurburgring in Germany.
Tesla has teased a video of the Model Y Performance from its European X account
We’ve been waiting for this trim of the Model Y for a very long timepic.twitter.com/izXviZKs4X
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) August 27, 2025
The Model Y Performance became a big-time hit after it packed the family-style interior with lightning-fast acceleration, speed, and handling.
As Tesla transitioned the Model Y into the updated “Juniper” design, the company took its time to create an even better vehicle with the new Performance configuration.
It has surely taken its time, but the vehicle appears to have undergone some exterior changes to enhance aerodynamics, handling, and overall performance.
We recently went into what was different about the test units spotted at Nurburgring in an article, but we’ll also list them here:
- New 21″ wheels
- All black headliner, a big change that was included in the Model Y L, the first time a Model Y has had that option
- Updated brakes
- Bucket seats that appear to be similar to the new Model Y L in China
- New Carbon Fiber Spoiler
- Performance Badging
- Changes to both the front and rear bumper
- Suspension with Adaptive Dampers
Tesla Model Y Performance zips around Nurburgring with new features
It does not seem like there’s much else it could be, but it is important to note that Tesla has been developing a handful of affordable models. There is a possibility that Tesla could launch one of these on Friday, but it seems unlikely.
The affordable models will likely be coming to the United States or China before they would in Europe.
They would be developed at Gigafactory Texas or Gigafactory Shanghai. The company stated in its Q2 Earnings Shareholder Deck that it had continued to expand its vehicle offerings and successfully manufactured the first builds of a more affordable model in June.
Volume production is planned for the second half of 2025.
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Flight 10 was so successful, it’s breaking the anti-Musk narrative
That’s all the proof one could need about the undeniable success of Starship Flight 10.

Starship Flight 10 was a huge success for SpaceX. When both the Super Heavy booster and the Starship Upper Stage successfully landed on their designated splashdown zones, the space community was celebrating.
The largest and most powerful rocket in the world had successfully completed its tenth test flight. And this time around, there were no rapid unscheduled disassemblies during the mission.
As per SpaceX in a statement following Flight 10, “every major objective was met, providing critical data to inform designs of the next generation Starship and Super Heavy.” The private space enterprise also stated that Flight 10 provided valuable data by stressing the limits of Starship’s capabilities.
With all of Flight 10’s mission objectives met, one would think that it would be pretty easy to cover the story of Starship’s successful tenth test flight. But that’s where one would be wrong, because Elon Musk companies, whether it be Tesla or SpaceX or xAI, tend to attract negative slant from mainstream media outlets.
This was in full force with Starship Flight 10’s coverage. Take the BBC’s Facebook post about the fight test, which read “Elon Musk’s giant rocket, earmarked for use in a 2027 mission to the Moon, has had multiple catastrophic failures in previous launches.” CNN was more direct with its slant, writing “SpaceX’s troubled Starship prototype pulls off successful flight after months of explosive mishaps” on its headline.
While some media outlets evidently adopted a negative slant towards Starship’s Flight 10 results, several other media sources actually published surprisingly positive articles about the successful test flight. The most notable of which is arguably the New York Times, which featured a headline that read “SpaceX’s Giant Mars Rocket Completes Nearly Flawless Test Flight.” Fox News also ran with a notably positive headline that read “SpaceX succeeds at third Starship test flight attempt after multiple scrubs.”
Having covered Elon Musk-related companies for the better part of a decade now, I have learned that mainstream coverage of any of his companies tends to be sprinkled with varying degrees of negative slant. The reasons behind this may never be fully explained, but it is just the way things are. This is why, when milestones such as Starship’s Flight 10 actually happen and mainstream media coverage becomes somewhat objective, I can’t help but be amazed.
After all, it takes one heck of a company led by one heck of a leader to force objectivity on an entity that has proven subjective over the years. And that, if any, is all the proof one could need about the undeniable success of Starship Flight 10.
Elon Musk
Tesla’s Elon Musk takes another shot at Waymo’s capabilities stemming from LiDAR
“LiDAR also does not work well in snow, rain or dust due to reflection scatter. That’s why Waymos stop working in any heavy precipitation.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has frequently expressed his opinions on LiDAR in the past, but in recent days, the EV maker’s frontman has continued to discuss the weaknesses in the technology and why his company has relied on cameras.
He also mentioned the suite’s limits on Waymo’s capabilities.
Tesla completely abandoned using radar alongside its camera suite a few years ago, something it referred to as “Tesla Vision” at the time. For its vehicles, it has only used cameras since this transition, and Musk has never once shied away from this strategy.
Earlier this week, he discussed the reliance of LiDAR and radar by other companies:
“Lidar and radar reduce safety due to sensor contention. If lidars/radars disagree with cameras, which one wins?
This sensor ambiguity causes increased, not decreased, risk. That’s why Waymos can’t drive on highways.
We turned off radars in Teslas to increase safety. Cameras ftw.”
Elon Musk argues lidar and radar make self driving cars more dangerous
He continued with this narrative again and mentioned Waymo specifically on a second occasion.
Musk’s focus this time was on Waymo vehicles and their capabilities in adverse weather, specifically snow, rain, or even dust storms, and how LiDAR struggles to navigate in these conditions.
He said:
“LiDAR also does not work well in snow, rain or dust due to reflection scatter. That’s why Waymos stop working in any heavy precipitation. As I have said many times, there is a role for LiDAR in some circumstances and I personally oversaw the development of LiDAR for the SpaceX Dragon docking with Space Station. I am well aware of its strengths and weaknesses.”
LiDAR also does not work well in snow, rain or dust due to reflection scatter. That’s why Waymos stop working in any heavy precipitation.
As I have said many times, there is a role for LiDAR in some circumstances and I personally oversaw the development of LiDAR for the SpaceX…— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 26, 2025
Tesla’s approach is significantly different than most companies. Waymo, Motional, Aurora, and Zoox all use LiDAR for their self-driving programs, while Tesla continues to rely on its camera-only approach.
Musk even said that Model S and Model X utilized a Tesla-developed high-resolution radar, but it could not “compare to passive optical (cameras), so we turned it off.”
Tesla developed high resolution radar and the hardware is actually present in Model S & X, but it just can’t compare to passive optical (cameras), so we turned it off.
As a side note, any military systems that rely on radar “stealth” technology are toast in a modern conflict,…
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 26, 2025
-
News20 hours ago
Tesla China working overtime to deliver Model Y L as quickly as possible
-
Elon Musk3 days ago
Elon Musk argues lidar and radar make self driving cars more dangerous
-
Elon Musk12 hours ago
SpaceX Starship Flight 10 was so successful, it’s breaking the anti-Musk narrative
-
News3 days ago
Tesla Model Y L sold out for September 2025
-
Elon Musk6 days ago
Elon Musk takes aim at Bill Gates’ Microsoft with new AI venture “Macrohard”
-
Elon Musk17 hours ago
Tesla reveals it has expanded its Robotaxi fleet in Austin
-
News1 day ago
WATCH: SpaceX attempts Starship’s tenth test flight after two delays
-
News2 days ago
Tesla one-ups Waymo once again with latest Robotaxi expansion in Austin