News
Rivian’s community growth is driven by a focus on sustainability
Rivian only officially entered the auto manufacturing scene last November, but you’d hardly know it by the headway the company has made in terms of branding and enthusiasm for its upcoming all-electric R1T pickup truck and R1S SUV. The startup’s flurry of marketing activity in the months since launching is largely to thank for the growing, nascent community. However, Rivian now has its sights set on earning even more respect from the clean energy crowd that’s already excited about electric vehicles via energy storage projects.
Last week, Rivian announced a new partnership with rock climber Alex Honnold and the Honnold Foundation to use the car maker’s used vehicle batteries for microgrid energy storage in underserved areas. The first project will take place in Adjuntas, Puerto Rico working with Casa Pueblo, a local organization committed transitioning their city’s energy grid to solar power. In the wake of Hurricane Maria, the Adjuntas community is ready for sustainable, independent energy sources, and Rivan’s batteries have substantial capacity – even after their vehicle life cycle is expended – to help with that transition.
The batteries Rivan is designing for its vehicles are purpose-built to have second-life storage applications, and the Adjuntas microgrid project will enable the company to implement the first steps of this broader plan. While the first R1T and R1S vehicles have yet to be delivered to patiently awaiting customers, spending time on environmentally-focused projects has been part of Rivian’s plans since its inception. “It’s the central motivation for the business,” CEO RJ Scaringe explained in a recently live streamed conversation about the joint microgrid initiative.
Many thanks to everyone who traveled near and far to be with us Saturday night in Denver. Such an amazing community is forming. To @casapuebloorg , @honnoldfound , @AlexHonnold, @RichRoll – exciting things to come . See more https://t.co/0XXhEqf5wk pic.twitter.com/yjjAThdzen
— Rivian (@Rivian) June 18, 2019
Scaringe is a self-described car enthusiast, but as his awareness and concern for the environmental issues surrounding gas-powered vehicles grew, he eventually made the decision to start a new car company that matched his values.
“The [cars] that I really loved were simultaneously making the planet worse, whether it’s geopolitical or air quality or climate change, and it really bothered me,” Scaringe admitted. “So…the way I thought I could have the most impact was to start a company. In starting Rivian, the goal was to create products that are exciting and built with passion and deliver real performance, but at the same time are deeply sustainable… The decisions we make as a company are absolutely made from the vantage point of how do we have the most impact.”
Alongside energy projects, Rivian has also made several appearances at trade shows, auto shows, and outdoor vendor events to continue building a network of business and consumer relationships that grow its community. New features and options have been announced as well, such as vehicle-to-vehicle charging and a portable kitchen set for the R1T gear tunnel, all of which have helped keep up enthusiasm for the company.
The attention Rivian has already garnered for the high-tech and performance stats of its upcoming R1T truck and R1S SUV is well deserved. Both vehicles have four electric motors with 750-800 total horsepower that can reach highway speeds in around 3 seconds, and 147 kW of independent power at each wheel also provides for torque vectoring. Rivian’s high-density battery packs have a thermal control system that adapts according to charging and driving behavior, and they’re tightly encased using advanced materials science to be capable of wading up to three feet of water. The 180 kWh “megapack” option is expected to give around 400 miles of range.
Rivian already has plenty to offer future customers as an all-electric car manufacturer full of innovative ideas, and their new sustainability initiative adds to the startup’s promising outlook. Production is slated for 2020 and pre-orders are available on the official website.
Lifestyle
NTSB findings on fatal Tesla crash tell a very different story
The NTSB confirmed the driver, not Tesla’s FSD, caused the fatal Texas house crash.
The National Transportation Safety Board released preliminary findings Wednesday confirming that a Tesla driver, not the vehicle’s software, caused a fatal crash in Katy, Texas in June. The driver, 44-year-old Michael Butler, had engaged Full Self-Driving Supervised mode on Rose Hollow Lane, a residential street with a 30 mph speed limit, before manually overriding the system by pressing the accelerator pedal all the way to 100%. Data recovered from the 2025 Tesla Model 3 showed the vehicle was traveling over 70 miles per hour when it struck a home and killed 76-year-old Martha Avila, who was inside. Weather was clear, the road was dry, and it was daylight.
Texas man charged in fatal Tesla crash where he blamed Autopilot
Butler told authorities he had passed out at the wheel. But security camera footage obtained by the NTSB told a different story, and showed the car accelerating through an intersection before leaving the road entirely. Police also found that Butler’s phone had Google searches including the terms “Tesla FSD not aggressive enough 2026” and “Tesla FSD too timid,” raising serious questions about how he was using the system before the crash. Butler has since been charged with manslaughter. The victim’s family has filed a lawsuit against both Butler and Tesla, alleging negligence.
The NTSB findings aligned directly with what Tesla VP of AI Software Ashok Elluswamy had already stated publicly on X in the weeks after the crash, writing that “the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100%.” The data confirmed his account.
Yup. In this case, the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area. They reached a speed of 73 mph during the crash, and had the accelerator pressed even after the crash.
— Ashok Elluswamy (@aelluswamy) June 22, 2026
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Tesla has once again demonstrated strong customer focus by swiftly addressing and fully refunding a bizarre Supercharger pricing glitch that affected drivers in Atlantic Canada.
The issue surfaced earlier this month when the Tesla app began displaying dramatically inflated per-minute charging rates at stations in Prince Edward Island and parts of New Brunswick.
One widely shared screenshot from a Charlottetown, PEI Supercharger showed rates reaching ridiculous levels: $6.00 per minute for the 180-250 kW tier, along with $3.57/min for 100-180 kW and $2.29/min for 60-100 kW.
Correct pricing will be going live at midnight tonight. All fees since July 2nd 2026 will be waived.
— Tesla Charging (@TeslaCharging) July 13, 2026
These figures were several times higher than normal Supercharger pricing in the region.
To put the error in perspective, charging at the highest incorrect rate would have been shockingly expensive.
At 250 kW, a common charging speed at Superchargers, a vehicle pulls roughly 4.17 kWh per minute. Under the glitch, a driver spending just 10 minutes at peak power would face a $60 bill. A typical 20- to 30-minute session to add meaningful range could have cost $120 to $180 or more, before any congestion fees.
Tesla gets another layer of gamification with Free Supercharging on the line
By comparison, standard Canadian Supercharger rates usually fall between $0.25 and $0.60 per kWh, making a similar session cost roughly $15–$40. The erroneous per-minute structure, combined with the inflated numbers, turned what should be a convenient stop into a potential financial shock.
The glitch appears to have started sometime around early July, and quickly drew attention on social media as owners questioned whether Tesla had implemented steep hidden increases. Some drivers even reported seeing $0 charges in their history, indicating broader billing confusion.
Tesla’s official Charging account on X stated that correct pricing would roll out at midnight on July 13, so the fix is already in effect. More importantly, the company announced it would waive all fees for every Supercharger session since July 2. This blanket waiver covers the entire affected period without requiring users to file individual claims, with automated refunds expected soon. The decision affects stations in PEI and nearby areas in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
It’s a classy move, and rather than issuing partial credits or forcing owners to submit support tickets, Tesla simply absorbed the cost of the system error and made drivers whole. In an industry where hidden fees and bill disputes are common, Tesla’s proactive, no-questions-asked approach reinforces owner trust and highlights the company’s commitment to service excellence.
The incident, while disruptive for a short time, ultimately showcases Tesla’s ability to own mistakes and prioritize customer satisfaction. Atlantic Canada Tesla owners can now charge with confidence again, knowing the company has their back when technology glitches occur.
In an era of complex EV billing, such transparency and generosity are refreshing and set a positive example for the industry.
NTSB findings on fatal Tesla crash tell a very different story
Elon Musk’s Texas ranch to showcase the lifelong work that changed the world
