News
Rivian’s patent reveals electric truck’s ability to auto-adjust to removable modules
In a recently issued patent generically titled “Systems and Methods for Reconfigurable Electric Vehicles”, electric truck maker Rivian imagined a customizable driver experience wherein its cars feature both swappable module components and a computer system that adjusts the vehicle’s configurations to fit them. There’s even a potential business opportunity included with the functionality via the suggestion that vehicles and modules don’t need be to owned by the same people.
Planning a jet ski trip but don’t have the right cargo fitting on your SUV? Perhaps you could rent the right bed from a local Rivian module supplier where, after installation, your car will adjust its suspension and height after detecting what’s been installed. There’s a lot of imagination that can be poured into an electric car brand when users are free to customize their vehicles’ utility purpose however they see fit, and Rivian has captured just that in this method patent.
Easily swapping out major parts of a car kind of sounds like something an infomercial might pitch, but according to Rivian, it’s an unfulfilled need in the electric vehicle arena. As summarized by their patent (U.S. Patent No. 10,207,757), there are numerous uses for EVs that aren’t being tapped into because their configurations aren’t adjustable like fossil fuel-powered vehicles. Perhaps the aftermarket availability of numerous non-EV truck bed types, for instance, were part of this invention’s inspiration to create and offer modules for Rivian vehicles.
So, what exactly is a module in the Rivian sense? Perhaps the patent should speak for itself, per claim 28: “…wherein said different removable structural models include a removable recreation module; a removable delivery module; a removable open box utility module; a removable flat bed support module; and a removable side rail module.” The patent further notes that these modules would be attached to Rivian’s vehicles via latching mechanisms. Through these components, Rivian’s electric trucks can accomplish various tasks that would conventionally require multiple vehicle setups.
Rivian’s patent goes beyond just owner convenience and flexibility. In fact, one of the systems claimed is a business structure wherein module-swapping drivers don’t even own the trucks/SUVs but rather use their varied configuration cars on a rental basis. Maybe a delivery service could use the vehicles as needed, outfitted with modules appropriate for the size and shape of their haul. Or a business traveler could rent special configurations based on their particular trips’ needs.
Additionally, proposed data tracking capabilities could provide usage monitoring that would create preferential settings based on a renter’s history with the Rivian pool fleet. Things like braking sensitivity and ride firmness would be part of the customized customer experience using this data.
Although it’s only somewhat recently made its entry into the all-electric car manufacturing scene and won’t have production cars coming off the line until 2020, Rivian is already making waves with its clever innovations. Extra large battery packs with low centers of gravity and high ground clearance are expected to provide an impressive 400 miles of range with 200 horsepower available at each wheel, and smaller auxiliary packs that function like portable fuel tanks are anticipated to be available as well.
Since Rivian’s electric trucks are meant to be luxury adventure vehicles as well as modularized utility units (potentially), self-driving guided tours reminiscent of those in Jurassic Park are also on the feature list. The coming announcements certainly sound exciting, and for those ready to make the leap into ownership, Rivian has opened up reservations for both vehicles on its website, estimated to be in the $60,000 range after incentives.
News
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system has now surpassed 8.4 billion cumulative miles.
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla has long emphasized that large-scale real-world data is central to improving its neural network-based approach to autonomy. Each mile driven with FSD (Supervised) engaged contributes additional edge cases and scenario training for the system.
The milestone also brings Tesla closer to a benchmark previously outlined by CEO Elon Musk. Musk has stated that roughly 10 billion miles of training data may be needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving at scale, citing the “long tail” of rare but complex driving situations that must be learned through experience.
The growth curve of FSD Supervised’s cumulative miles over the past five years has been notable.
As noted in data shared by Tesla watcher Sawyer Merritt, annual FSD (Supervised) miles have increased from roughly 6 million in 2021 to 80 million in 2022, 670 million in 2023, 2.25 billion in 2024, and 4.25 billion in 2025. In just the first 50 days of 2026, Tesla owners logged another 1 billion miles.
At the current pace, the fleet is trending towards hitting about 10 billion FSD Supervised miles this year. The increase has been driven by Tesla’s growing vehicle fleet, periodic free trials, and expanding Robotaxi operations, among others.
With the fleet now past 8.4 billion cumulative miles, Tesla’s supervised system is approaching that threshold, even as regulatory approval for fully unsupervised deployment remains subject to further validation and oversight.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Elon Musk fired back at Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales after the longtime online encyclopedia leader dismissed xAI’s new AI-powered alternative, Grokipedia, as a “ridiculous” idea that is bound to fail.
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Wales made the comments while answering questions about Wikipedia’s neutrality. According to Wales, Wikipedia prides itself on neutrality.
“One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality. A neutral point of view is non-negotiable. It’s in the community, unquestioned… The idea that we’ve become somehow ‘Wokepidea’ is just not true,” Wales said.
When asked about potential competition from Grokipedia, Wales downplayed the situation. “There is no competition. I don’t know if anyone uses Grokipedia. I think it is a ridiculous idea that will never work,” Wales wrote.
After Grokipedia went live, Larry Sanger, also a co-founder of Wikipedia, wrote on X that his initial impression of the AI-powered Wikipedia alternative was “very OK.”
“My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury’s still out as to whether it’s actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say ‘maybe!’” Sanger stated.
Musk responded to Sanger’s assessment by saying it was “accurate.” In a separate post, he added that even in its V0.1 form, Grokipedia was already better than Wikipedia.
During a past appearance on the Tucker Carlson Show, Sanger argued that Wikipedia has drifted from its original vision, citing concerns about how its “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” framework categorizes publications by perceived credibility. As per Sanger, Wikipedia’s “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” list leans heavily left, with conservative publications getting effectively blacklisted in favor of their more liberal counterparts.
As of writing, Grokipedia has reportedly surpassed 80% of English Wikipedia’s article count.
News
Tesla Sweden appeals after grid company refuses to restore existing Supercharger due to union strike
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons.
Tesla Sweden is seeking regulatory intervention after a Swedish power grid company refused to reconnect an already operational Supercharger station in Åre due to ongoing union sympathy actions.
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons. A temporary construction power cabinet supplying the station had fallen over, described by Tesla as occurring “under unclear circumstances.” The power was then cut at the request of Tesla’s installation contractor to allow safe repair work.
While the safety issue was resolved, the station has not been brought back online. Stefan Sedin, CEO of Jämtkraft elnät, told Dagens Arbete (DA) that power will not be restored to the existing Supercharger station as long as the electric vehicle maker’s union issues are ongoing.
“One of our installers noticed that the construction power had been backed up and was on the ground. We asked Tesla to fix the system, and their installation company in turn asked us to cut the power so that they could do the work safely.
“When everything was restored, the question arose: ‘Wait a minute, can we reconnect the station to the electricity grid? Or what does the notice actually say?’ We consulted with our employer organization, who were clear that as long as sympathy measures are in place, we cannot reconnect this facility,” Sedin said.
The union’s sympathy actions, which began in March 2024, apply to work involving “planning, preparation, new connections, grid expansion, service, maintenance and repairs” of Tesla’s charging infrastructure in Sweden.
Tesla Sweden has argued that reconnecting an existing facility is not equivalent to establishing a new grid connection. In a filing to the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate, the company stated that reconnecting the installation “is therefore not covered by the sympathy measures and cannot therefore constitute a reason for not reconnecting the facility to the electricity grid.”
Sedin, for his part, noted that Tesla’s issue with the Supercharger is quite unique. And while Jämtkraft elnät itself has no issue with Tesla, its actions are based on the unions’ sympathy measures against the electric vehicle maker.
“This is absolutely the first time that I have been involved in matters relating to union conflicts or sympathy measures. That is why we have relied entirely on the assessment of our employer organization. This is not something that we have made any decisions about ourselves at all.
“It is not that Jämtkraft elnät has a conflict with Tesla, but our actions are based on these sympathy measures. Should it turn out that we have made an incorrect assessment, we will correct ourselves. It is no more difficult than that for us,” the executive said.
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
