Connect with us

News

Elon Musk crowns WARR Hyperloop with 3rd consecutive win after record-breaking 290 mph run

[Credit: WARR Hyperloop]

Published

on

WARR Hyperloop, a team of students from the Technical University of Munich, has been dubbed as the overall winner of the 2018 Hyperloop Pod Competition. During its winning runs, Team WARR’s sleek, aerodynamic pod was able to propel itself to speeds of 290 mph, breaking the record set last December by Virgin Hyperloop One’s pod, which hit the 240 mph mark.

As noted by SpaceX on the event’s official page, the competition for 2018 would be focused on a single criterion — maximum speed. This year’s competition only had a couple of requirements for the teams participating in the event. The Hyperloop Pods must be self-propelled, and they have to be fast. Very, very fast.

https://twitter.com/WARR_Hyperloop/status/1021256781106835457

Achieving top speed in SpaceX’s Hyperloop test track on its headquarters in Hawthorne, CA, is a challenge in itself. The test track, after all, is only 0.8 miles long, which requires the self-propelled pods to accelerate hard immediately from a standstill. In a press release last month, Team WARR stated that they are hoping to achieve 372 mph (600 kph) in this year’s competition. The team’s pod ultimately did not hit 372 mph, but its 290 mph run was enough to crown it the winner of this year’s Hyperloop event.

Elon Musk was in attendance at the 2018 Hyperloop Pod Competition. For their feat, Team WARR received a special token from the Tesla and SpaceX CEO — a signed, metallic model of Musk’s original Hyperloop pod design. With this win, WARR Hyperloop has managed to establish itself as the team to beat in SpaceX’s competition. The team of students from Munich, after all, has garnered the fastest pod award for three consecutive events.

WARR Hyperloop wins the 2018 SpaceX Hyperloop Pod Competition. [Credit: WARR Hyperloop/Flickr]

Advertisement
-

The three finalists for the 2018 Hyperloop Pod Competition were formidable teams. Apart from Team WARR, Team Delft from the Netherlands, which won the overall best pod award in SpaceX’s first Hyperloop competition, was also present. EPF Loop from Switzerland was also a finalist. When it came to the actual top speed attempts, Delft Hyperloop and EPF Loop were faced with misfortune.

Team Delft’s Hyperloop pod, for one, was only able to attain a top speed of 88 mph before stalling. The pod, which was the latest iteration of its winning design during the first Hyperloop Competition, was already showing problems in the week leading up to the event, including a fried circuit board not long before the competition. EPF Loop, on the other hand, was also met with complications that ultimately caused its pod to accelerate to speeds of only 55 mph.

Ultimately, WARR Hyperloop’s victory could very well be due to the engineering that went to the team’s pod itself. As noted by WARR Hyperloop in a press release, this year’s pod has been upgraded from a 50 kW electric motor to a system employing eight smaller electric motors with a total output of 240 kW or 320 hp. The pod is also smaller than its predecessor and is more aerodynamic in shape, allowing it to accelerate and stop without any problems.

Watch WARR Hyperloop’s teaser for its pod in the video below.

Advertisement
-

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

News

Tesla crosses major Unsupervised Self-Driving milestone

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla has reached a notable benchmark in its autonomous driving program after its Robotaxi fleet surpassed one million miles of unsupervised operation. The company made the announcement during its Cybercab event in Austin on September 3.

Tesla Vice President of AI Ashok Elluswamy told attendees he was happy to report the fleet had achieved one million miles of unsupervised Robotaxi operation as a testament to safety.

The new total marked a sharp increase from the 380,000 unsupervised miles Tesla disclosed during its second-quarter 2026 earnings update in late July.

In roughly six weeks, the company added about 620,000 miles. That acceleration followed Tesla’s decision to remove in-vehicle safety monitors from most of its operations outside the San Francisco Bay Area.

Credit: Tesla

Tesla first launched Robotaxi service in Austin in June 2025 with safety drivers present. It later began fully unsupervised rides and expanded into Dallas, Houston, Miami, Orlando, and Tampa. The San Francisco Bay Area remains the exception, where a safety monitor still rides in the vehicle under California permitting rules.

The company has not released a city-by-city breakdown of the one million unsupervised miles.

The milestone arrived as Tesla began offering public Cybercab rides in Austin. The purpose-built vehicle has no steering wheel or pedals and is designed only for autonomous ride-hailing. Production versions joined the existing fleet of modified Tesla vehicles already operating in the service.

Advertisement
-

Tesla’s unsupervised mileage is growing at a double-digit weekly rate according to earlier company comments, yet its fleet size remains modest compared with established competitors. Waymo has accumulated more than 200 million fully autonomous rider-only miles. Tesla has described its own unsupervised operations as having recorded zero notable incidents in the period leading up to the July update.

The one-million-mile figure reflects Tesla’s shift from supervised testing to broader driverless service in multiple states. It also highlights the company’s strategy of using both existing Model Y vehicles and the new Cybercab to scale its network.

Credit: Tesla

Whether the rapid recent growth continues will depend on further city expansions, regulatory approvals, and the performance of the purpose-built Cybercab in everyday paid rides. Tesla has not specified how many of the latest miles involved the new vehicle versus the rest of the fleet.

The announcement underscores Tesla’s progress toward a larger robotaxi network while illustrating the remaining gap in total autonomous experience relative to longer-operating rivals.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla Robotaxi will be a 24/7 service: here’s when

Published

on

Credit: @AdanGuajardo/X

Tesla AI lead Ashok Elluswamy said this week that 24-hour Robotaxi service is close. Replying on X to a rider who wanted Cybercab trips all night, he wrote that the capability would arrive “next month or so” once “the next tech to merge on the v15 plan” is ready.

The comment landed on September 4, one day after Tesla opened public Cybercab rides in Austin. It is the clearest near-term timeline yet for overnight unsupervised operation. Tesla’s paid Robotaxi network currently runs from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. seven days a week across Austin, Dallas, Houston, Miami, Orlando, and Tampa.

That 16-hour window is shorter than the 6 a.m. to 2 a.m. schedule the company used for much of the prior year.

Elluswamy did not name the specific feature or say whether the change would apply first to purpose-built Cybercabs, the existing Model Y fleet, or both. He also offered no city-by-city rollout list. The link to Full Self-Driving v15 is nevertheless significant.

Advertisement
-

Tesla has described v15 as a step-change architecture with seven parallel improvement tracks and roughly ten times more parameters than earlier builds. Early versions of that software already operate on the Robotaxi fleet and contain about 40 percent of the planned gains.

By July 2026, the unsupervised fleet had logged more than 380,000 miles across six cities in two states with what the company called an impeccable safety record and no notable incidents caused by the vehicles themselves. Tesla has repeatedly argued that camera-based end-to-end neural networks, rather than extra sensors, are the core of the solution.

Overnight service would test that claim in lower-light conditions and would also raise vehicle utilization, a key variable for Robotaxi unit economics. The company has already begun using public Superchargers at night and is building dedicated Robotaxi charging sites.

Riders have asked why software must change if the cars already drive in the dark. The practical answer appears to be reliability and scale: Tesla has held back mass expansion until more of the v15 stack is merged, citing the need for higher confidence before putting thousands of unoccupied vehicles on streets around the clock.

If the next module arrives on the timetable Elluswamy sketched, 24-hour service could begin in October 2026 in at least some markets.

That would mark a shift from a daytime-bounded pilot to a service that can run whenever demand exists, including the late-night hours that have so far remained out of reach.

Advertisement
-
Continue Reading

News

Tesla Full Self-Driving will now overtake manual driving to avoid disaster

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla is beginning to roll out Full Self-Driving Supervised v14.3.9 with a new active safety layer that can take control even when the driver is operating the car manually.

Tesla AI said the software can activate FSD on the driver’s behalf when an imminent collision is detected and Automatic Emergency Braking may not be enough. It may also engage if the system detects heavy distraction or an accidental FSD disengagement.

Advertisement
-

The capability is essentially Automatic Collision Evasion. However, unlike conventional AEB, which mainly applies the brakes in a straight line, this feature can use steering, braking, and acceleration together if the car calculates that stopping alone will not prevent impact and a safer path exists. The system may change lanes or move toward a shoulder when conditions allow, then continue driving after the immediate threat is handled rather than simply coming to a stop.

The intervention is meant as a last-resort safety net, not a replacement for attentive driving.

Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.3.7 early review: FSD saved me from an accident

Tesla’s own description still frames FSD as supervised assistance. Secondary reports on internal release notes say the feature can fire while the car is being driven manually if cabin-camera monitoring suggests the driver is not sufficiently attentive, such as reaching toward the back seat, or if FSD appears to have been turned off unintentionally.

After the emergency maneuver, the car is expected to alert the driver and request a return to manual control.

The safety case is straightforward. Many collisions happen in the last second because a driver is looking away, fumbles a control, or faces an obstacle that braking cannot fully solve. A system that can both recognize that AEB is insufficient and execute a coordinated evasive path can reduce those remaining high-severity events.

Advertisement
-

Re-engaging after accidental disengagement also addresses a practical failure mode: a small steering nudge that drops FSD at the worst moment. The advantage is a background safety net that uses the same vision stack already running in v14, instead of leaving the car solely to emergency braking once the driver is no longer in command.

The feature still depends on FSD being enabled and, according to reports, an active FSD purchase or subscription. It does not make the vehicle unsupervised. Drivers remain responsible, and Tesla has not published how often the system is expected to intervene or how it will handle false positives.

If the rollout is conservative and the false-alarm rate stays low, the update is a meaningful step: FSD is no longer only a feature the driver turns on. In the rare moments when disaster is already forming, it can step in.

Continue Reading