News
Tesla Removes 85 kWh Battery Option in Canada, Is it a Sign?
Tesla will no longer offer the 85 kWh battery to Model S customers in Canada. It also has deleted the single motor rear wheel drive version of the car for people who live north of the border. The company has given no explanation for the changes.
The Model S can no longer be ordered with the 85 kWh battery according to the recent spot in the CanadianTesla Design Studio.
Updated Feb. 8, 2016: Tesla officially discontinues Model S 85 kWh battery option worldwide
The move has left many across the Tesla social groups wondering why the change only applies in Canada? Is this a signal that similar changes are about to happen in other countries as well? Elon has always maintained that an increase in battery capacity by 5% a year should be expected. Perhaps a 95kWh or even a 100 kWh battery may be in the offing for later this year.
The 85 kWh battery has been the largest size battery offering since Tesla first opened up Model S for orders in 2012. In 2013, Tesla discontinued a 40 kWh version of the battery due to lack of demand, leaving both a 60 kWh version and the 85 kWh pack as available options.
More recently, Tesla has discontinued the 60 kWh battery and replaced it with a 70 kWh version capable of 230 miles (385 km) of range, as well as introduced the 90 kWh battery capable of over 270+ miles, during the time when the company announced its Ludicrous mode option.
Tesla made the 70D variant of the Model S the entry level model, but then backtracked and reinstated a rear wheel drive version for $5,000 less. The company seems to be experimenting with different equipment combinations, trying to find the perfect alignment of affordability, performance, supply, and profits. By having the 70 kWh and 90 kWh as the only available battery options, Tesla is leaving a significant step in price between the battery configurations perhaps as a strategic move to cater to two different types of audiences – those that want a lower cost barrier of entry while having 200+ miles of range, and those that seek longer range with higher performance in mind.
It’s also possible that having a larger battery at the top of the range will allow Tesla to increase the size of the entry level battery as well. Perhaps a Model S 75D is lurking around the corner? A slightly larger battery would benefit the current entry level 70D Model X by giving it some extra range, something the super heavyweight electric crossover could leverage especially when put to use.
The configuration change in Canada may also presage a move to make dual motors standard across the range. Doing so would help streamline production and improve the number of cars Tesla can build each week.
Elon has said the company makes up to 20 running changes to its cars every month. Most of them are not publicized. Perhaps Tesla wants to avoid a situation like Chevrolet and Nissan found themselves in last year when they each announced significantly improved versions of the Volt and LEAF were coming soon. Sales of existing cars plummeted as a result. By simply implementing changes it deems necessary without fanfare, Tesla avoids falling into the same trap.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
