A Tesla email revealed that an employee attempted to “maliciously” sabotage part of the Fremont Factory, according to Bloomberg. The employee’s actions reportedly disrupted operations at the Fremont Factory, but Tesla was able to handle the situation quickly and resume normal operations just hours after the attack.
The alleged sabotage was mentioned in an email sent by Tesla’s Vice President of Legal and acting General Counsel, Al Prescott, on Monday. “Two weeks ago, our IT and InfoSec teams determined than [sic] an employee had maliciously sabotaged a part of the Factory. Their quick actions prevented further damage and production was running smoothly again a few hours later,” wrote Prescott in the email.
The employee, who was not named by the Tesla executive in the email, initially tried to “cover up his tracks” by attempting to destroy evidence, reported Bloomberg. He also attempted to use a co-worker as his scapegoat. “Ultimately, after being shown the irrefutable evidence, the employee confessed. As a result, we terminated employment,” Prescott wrote.
As of this writing, the specific actions of the former Tesla employee have not been divulged, with details related to the incident coming from Prescott’s communication. The email Bloomberg acquired revealed that the alleged saboteur did manage to disrupt the facility’s operations for a short time. Whether or not that was the former employee’s intent remains unclear. Based on Prescott’s description of the employee’s actions, however, one could infer that the attempted sabotage was notable.
The Fremont Factory is Tesla’s main production site in California and produces the company’s Model S, Model 3, Model X and Model Y vehicles. The cars made at Fremont are sold in the United States, Europe, and Asia. As demand increases for Tesla vehicles, especially for its Model 3 and Model Y EVs, efficient production has become even more crucial. Any disruption in the production line could adversely affect Tesla’s goals and plans.
Unfortunately, Tesla is familiar with incidents like this recent sabotage attempt. For example, in August 2020, a Russian named Egor Igorevich Kriuchkov attempted to take the company’s trade secrets hostage in a ransomware ploy.
Kriuchkov had contacted a Tesla employee working in Gigafactory Nevada through WhatsApp to gain access to the electric manufacturer’s computer networks. The employee met with Kriuchkov twice until the Russian revealed his plot to retrieve sensitive data from Tesla’s systems and hold it hostage until the company paid the ransom. Kriuchkov offered the Tesla employee up to $1 million for his participation in the planned ransomware attack.
In the incident with the Russian, however, the Tesla employee played the protagonist of the story. The Nevada employee was never named, but he immediately informed Tesla about the Russian’s planned cybersecurity attack which gave the company time to contact the FBI and catch the would-be hacker. Following a series of meetings with Kriuchkov under the guidance of the FBI, the employee was able to gather enough information, which helped authorities arrest the Russian as he was trying to leave the United States.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
