Connect with us

News

Tesla Gigafactory Update: 31 new permits, 2x in size, 2170 battery ‘Module Line’

Published

on

According to new building permit data obtained by BuildZoom, Tesla has received 31 permits since July 19 worth $93 million for its Sparks, Nevada-based Gigafactory battery plant. More than half of the project cost ($53.7 million) is going into construction of a new section adjoining the north end of the existing building.

Those that attended the Gigafactory Grand Opening Party over the summer will recall an area designated as the main lobby that was decorated with a red Model 3. A completely new section has since been constructed directly north of this area designated as Section F.

 

Tesla Gigafactory: photo from July 24 (left) vs. Nov. 2 (right)

Two permits detailing a $3,438,000 project for “seismic anchoring” and an additional one at $426,567 for “Sample Line A2F Tool Drop Install” provides a clear view that work is well underway on the company’s ‘2170 Module Line’. Tesla has begun manufacturing its new 2170 battery cell format in conjunction with Panasonic for its line of home and commercial battery storage products – Powerwall and Powerpack. The new cell format, 21 millimeters in diameter and 70 millimeters long, provides significant improvements in energy density over the more traditional 18650 cells currently being used on its fleet of vehicles.

Advertisement

Tesla recently announced that it has doubled the energy storage capacity on its residential and grid scale storage products. Powerpack units produced at the Gigafactory are already being used at Southern California Edison’s Mira Loma substation for a system that will become the largest lithium ion battery storage project in the world.

A Tesla representative describes the process by which 2170 battery cells are moved across the Gigafactory – July 29, 2016

Jack Cookson at BuildZoom tells us that Tesla has taken initiatives to earthquake proof the Gigafactory. “While I do not know if it is common among factories to earthquake proof their production lines I do know that we have seen a number of permits for seismic work at the factory”.

Advertisement

Another high value project noted in a permit filing from September is a $7 million dollar thermal energy storage tank. It’s not clear what this unit will be used for but traditionally a chilled water thermal energy storage system is frequently used to air condition large commercial or industrial spaces. Tesla registered a subsequent permit in late September valued at $800,000 for a “chilled water extension.”

To see a complete listing of building permits filed for Tesla’s Gigafactory, which includes a recent permit calling for the demolition of an abandoned house, visit BuildZoom.


If you’re considering solar for your home or business, we encourage you to get a solar cost estimate first, based on your monthly utility bill and location. The service is being provided by an affiliate partner and fan to Teslarati.
Advertisement

"I write about technology and the coming zero emissions revolution."

Advertisement
Comments

News

Ferrari unveils its Luce EV, and its reception has been a disaster

Published

on

Credit: Ferrari

Ferrari unveiled its Luce EV over the weekend, and so far, its reception has been an absolute disaster, gathering negative reactions from a wide variety of people, including former executives.

The stock even took a hit on its first day of trading following the unveiling, dropping over 7 percent.

Ferrari moving to EVs from its traditional V12s and mid-engine sports cars is a massive move. It was designed by Sir Jony Ive and Marc Newsom’s LoveFrom studio, which is known for design work for tech giant Apple. “Luce” means “light” in Italian, so Ferrari drew inspiration for its name from its sleek design, characterized by a smooth, sculpted body with rounded edges.

But its reception has been far from what Ferrari expected. The overall design has drawn some harsh criticism since its reveal, and it is simply stunning that such a storied company, with a rich history of beautiful, powerful cars has revealed a design that many are not a fan of.

Advertisement

Responses to the design were widely negative, with some saying, “Enzo is rolling in his grave,” and “This looks like a Nissan LEAF with a bad body kit.”

Advertisement

Former Ferrari Chairman Luca di Montezemolo said:

“I’ve seen the project has already been delayed more than two years. I don’t like commenting from the stands—when I was in the game, it annoyed me when people did that. I think for now the electric Ferrari could have been avoided, but clearly Ferrari made huge investments in plants and the car itself for their own reasons. Maybe Porsche’s lesson is useful for reflection.”

He continued that, “If I say what I think, it’d harm Ferrari.”

Ferrari has scaled back EV commitments in the past, primarily in response to weaker-than-expected demand for its electric powertrains.

Priced at roughly $640,000 in the U.S., it is tough to see how this car will ever truly live up to the massive expectations many had for it. It almost feels like, to a certain extent, Ferrari is looking for a way to get out of building EVs.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Tesla unveils juicy new detail on the Roadster and hints at new unveil timeline

Published

on

A red Tesla Roadster driving around a turn
(Credit: Tesla)

Tesla unveiled a juicy new detail on the Roadster, its long-delayed supercar project, and additionally hinted at a new unveiling timeline, as it appears yet another month will pass without seeing the capabilities of the vehicle.

Vice President of Vehicle Engineering at Tesla, Lars Moravy, revealed on the Ride the Lightning podcast that the Roadster will be built at Gigafactory Texas, adding that “you’ll start to see a lot of things unfold in the next months.”

While we get a good detail on the plant of manufacture, we also get another letdown, as it appears the unveiling event will not take place in May, as CEO Elon Musk hinted during the Earnings Call.

The Roadster was first unveiled back in 2017, alongside the Semi, which entered production earlier this year. It was Tesla’s attempt at a true supercar; it would be rare, expensive, and lightning quick, among other incredible capabilities, like potentially hovering for a short period thanks to a collaboration project with SpaceX.

However, the vehicle was set to be delivered in 2020. Parts and supply chain issues due to the COVID-19 pandemic started these delays, and since then, Tesla, and specifically Musk, have wanted to push the capabilities of the Roadster to somewhere the human mind may not be able to currently comprehend.

Both Chief Designer Franz von Holzhausen and Moravy have said many things about the Roadster over the past few years, hinting that the car truly could be worth the wait. However, the continuous delays we’ve seen have undoubtedly been discouraging.

Advertisement

With that being said, it’s not like Tesla has been doing nothing. Instead, the company has been focusing on revamping current models, phasing out others, and working on developing the cars of the future, specifically, the Cybercab, which entered production at Giga Texas in April.

Despite the Roadster’s delays, there is still a ton of anticipation for the vehicle to be released. It will have a steering wheel, as Musk said it will be “the best of the last of the human-driven cars.”

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

NASA just gave SpaceX more crew missions because Boeing can’t certify

Published

on

By

NASA has filed a procurement notice announcing its intent to add six post-certification missions to SpaceX’s existing Commercial Crew Transportation Capability contract. The agency said it would order up to three of those missions immediately upon adding them to the contract, with the remaining three available as needed through the end of the International Space Station’s planned operations in 2030.

The reason for the expansion is straightforward. NASA cited recently shortened ISS mission durations, technical issues and schedule delays encountered by Boeing, the allocation of missions between Boeing and SpaceX, and the ongoing technical challenges of maintaining a reliable crew transportation capability as the driving factors behind the decision. Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner has still not been certified for crewed flights, and a cargo-only Starliner mission was not included on NASA’s most recent mission manifest. With Boeing effectively sidelined for the foreseeable future, SpaceX is the only American company capable of rotating crews to the station.

SpaceX Board has set a Mars bonus for Elon Musk

The history behind this contract tells the fuller story of how SpaceX got here. NASA originally awarded SpaceX its Commercial Crew contract in 2014 for $2.6 billion. In 2022 NASA modified the contract to add five missions covering Crew-10 through Crew-14, worth $1.436 billion, bringing the total contract value at that point to $4.9 billion. The recent May 18 filing by NASA extends that runway further, with Crew-12 currently docked at the station and Crew-13 assigned and targeting a mid-September 2026 launch.

Advertisement

According to a report by SpaceNews, NASA stated in its filing: “It is necessary to award additional PCMs to SpaceX given the recently shortened ISS mission durations, technical issues and schedule delays encountered by Boeing, the allocation of missions between Boeing and SpaceX, NASA’s projections for when an alternative crew transportation system may become available, and the ongoing technical challenges of maintaining a reliable capability for crewed flights to ISS.”

No dollar value for the new six missions has been publicly confirmed yet, but based on the 2022 precedent of roughly $287 million per mission, the new block could represent close to $1.7 billion in additional contract value. With SpaceX simultaneously preparing Starship as NASA’s Artemis lunar lander, filing its S-1 for a June IPO, and now absorbing more ISS crew rotation work, the company’s role as the primary contractor for American human spaceflight is no longer a matter of circumstance. It is NASA policy.

Continue Reading