Connect with us

News

Tesla Model 3 is the most affordable car to run in the United States: study

Credit: Tesla Asia/X

Published

on

A study from Self Financial has determined that the Tesla Model 3 sedan is the most affordable car to run in the United States. Its sibling, the best-selling Model Y crossover also made it to the list. 

This is quite impressive for Tesla’s two mainstream vehicles as the Model 3 and Model Y are both premium priced.

The analysis:

  • For its study, Self Financial considered the running costs of the 50 best-selling vehicles from 2022 to 2024 to find out how much it costs to run a car on average in the United States.
  • The study took into account the average annual costs for fuel or energy, maintenance, insurance, and fees and taxes of the United States’ best-selling vehicles, among other factors.
  • Based on the study’s results, it costs an average of $6,462 per year to run one of the United States’ best-selling vehicles. 
  • Fuel costs tend to be the largest expense, comprising 34.8% of all annual running costs in the study.
  • On average, $2,246 is spent on fuel or energy costs; $1,633 is spent on maintenance costs; $1,763 is spent on car insurance; and $820 is spent on annual fees and taxes.
Credit: Self Financial

Tesla’s results:

  • Self Financial found that the Tesla Model 3 is the most affordable car to run in the United States, with an annual running cost of $5,061.
  • The annual energy costs of the Tesla Model 3 were the lowest in the study at just $636 per year. That’s 71.68% lower than the study average of $2,246.
  • The annual maintenance costs of the Model 3 were also the lowest of all the cars that were analyzed in the study, at just $1,143. That’s 30% below the study average of $1,633.
  • The Tesla Model 3 would have been even cheaper to run, but the vehicle was the study’s 3rd most expensive car to insure at $2,241 per year. 
  • The Model 3’s annual fees and taxes were also higher than the study average at $1,041 per year.
  • The Tesla Model Y was the study’s 7th most affordable car to run, with an annual fuel cost of $708, annual maintenance of $1,339, annual insurance cost of $2,399, and annual fees and taxes of $947.

Self Financial’s other findings:

  • A look at the results of the other vehicles in the study highlights the low running and maintenance costs of Tesla’s two mainstream vehicles.
  • Most of the vehicles in the list were notably more affordable than the Model 3 and Model Y, such as the Hyundai Elantra, which was the second most affordable car to run in the United States. 
  • For context, the Hyundai Elantra, a budget-friendly sedan, had an annual fuel cost of $1,615, annual maintenance cost of $1,435, annual insurance cost of $1,547, and annual fees and taxes of just $508.

Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Energy

Tesla Energy celebrates one decade of sustainability

Tesla Energy has gone far since its early days, and it is now becoming a progressively bigger part of the company.

Published

on

(Credit: Tesla)

Tesla Energy recently celebrated its 10th anniversary with a dedicated video showcasing several of its milestones over the past decade.

Tesla Energy has gone far since its early days, and it is now becoming a progressively bigger part of the company.

Tesla Energy Early Days

When Elon Musk launched Tesla Energy in 2015, he noted that the business is a fundamental transformation of how the world works. To start, Tesla Energy offered the Powerwall, a 7 kWh/10 kWh home battery system, and the Powerpack, a grid-capable 100 kWh battery block that is designed for scalability. A few days after the products’ launch, Musk noted that Tesla had received 38,000 reservations for the Powerwall and 2,500 reservations for the Powerpack

Tesla Energy’s beginnings would herald its quiet growth, with the company later announcing products like the Solar Roof tile, which is yet to be ramped, and the successor to the Powerwall, the 13.5 kWh Powerwall 2. In recent years, Tesla Energy also launched its Powerwall 3 home battery and the massive Megapack, a 3.9 MWh monster of a battery unit that has become the backbone for energy storage systems across the globe.

Key Milestones

As noted by Tesla Energy in its recent video, it has now established facilities that allow the company to manufacture 20,000 units of the Megapack every year, which should help grow the 23 GWh worth of Megapacks that have already been deployed globally. 

Advertisement

The Powerwall remains a desirable home battery as well, with more than 850,000 units installed worldwide. These translate to 12 GWh of residential entry storage delivered to date. Just like the Megapack, Tesla is also ramping its production of the Powerwall, allowing the division to grow even more.

Tesla Energy’s Role

While Tesla Energy does not catch as much headlines as the company’s electric vehicle businesses, its contributions to the company’s bottom line have been growing. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, Tesla Energy deployed 10.4 GWh of energy storage products. Powerwall deployments also crossed 1 GWh in one quarter for the first time. As per Tesla in its Q1 2025 Update Letter, the gross margin for the Energy division has improved sequentially as well.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

EU considers SES to augment Starlink services

The EU considers funding SES to support Starlink. With MEO satellites already serving NATO, SES could be key in Europe’s space autonomy push.

Published

on

EU-ses-starlink-augment
(Credit: SES)

European satellite company SES is negotiating with the European Union (EU) and other governments to complement SpaceX’s Starlink, as Europe seeks home-grown space-based communication solutions. The talks aim to bolster regional resilience amid growing concerns over reliance on foreign providers.

In March, the European Commission contacted SES and France’s Eutelsat to assess their potential role if American-based Starlink access for Ukraine was disrupted. The European Commission proposed funding EU-based satellite operators to support Kyiv. Ukraine is considering alternatives to Starlink over concerns about Elon Musk’s reliability.

Arthur De Liedekerke of Rasmussen Global warned, “Elon Musk is, in fact, the guardian of Ukraine’s connectivity on the battlefield. And that’s a strategic vulnerability.” However, SpaceX’s Starlink constellation is leagues ahead of any competition in the EU.

“Now the discussions are much more strategic in nature. They’re much more mid-term, long-term. And what we’re seeing is all of the European governments are serious about increasing their defense spending. There are alternatives, not to completely replace Starlink, that’s not possible, but to augment and complement Starlink,” SES CEO Adel Al-Saleh told Reuters.

Advertisement

SES operates about 70 satellites, including over 20 medium Earth orbit (MEO) units at 8,000 km. The company provides high-speed internet for government, military, and underserved areas. It plans to expand its MEO fleet to 100, enhancing secure communications for NATO and the Pentagon.

“The most significant demand (for us) is European nations investing in space, much more than what they did before,” Al-Saleh said.

Competition from Starlink, Amazon’s Kuiper, and China’s SpaceSail, with their extensive low-Earth orbit constellations, underscores Europe’s push for independence.

“It is not right to say they just want to avoid Starlink or the Chinese. They want to avoid being dependent on one or two providers. They want to have flexibility,” Al-Saleh noted.

SES’s discussions reflect Europe’s strategic shift toward diversified satellite networks, balancing reliance on Starlink with regional capabilities. As governments ramp up defense spending, SES aims to play a pivotal role in complementing global providers, ensuring robust connectivity for military and civilian needs across the continent.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Elon Musk gets 96% negative media coverage, worse than Trump: report

The MRC’s findings were shared by FOX News in a recent report.

Published

on

Credit: Elon Musk/X

An analysis from the Media Research Center (MRC) has determined something very interesting. While United States President Donald Trump received a notable amount of negative media coverage in his first 100 days, Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s media coverage was even worse.

The MRC’s findings were shared by FOX News in a recent report.

MRC’s Trump Findings

As per the MRC, evening newscasts on ABC, NBC, and CBS have hit Trump with 92% negative media coverage as he approached his 100th day in office. For its analysis, the MRC analyzed ABC’s “World News Tonight,” “NBC Nightly News” and “CBS Evening News” from January 20 through April 9. The watchdog group found 899 stories about Trump, 92.2% of which were negative and 7.8% of which were positive.

Researcher Rich Noyes, in a comment to FOX, stated that Trump’s media coverage this term has been more negative compared to his first term in 2016 so far. During his first term, using the same methodology, the MRC found that Trump was hit with just 89% negative media coverage from the same networks. For context, former President Joe Biden received 59% positive news media coverage in his first 100 days, the MRC noted.

Musk Even Worse

While the negative media coverage about Donald Trump was already notable, it was still less negative than the media coverage received by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. As per the MRC, Elon Musk received a whopping 96% negative media coverage, which is quite notable considering that his links to the Trump administration are mostly through his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 

Advertisement

So far, the only Trump ally that received worse coverage than Musk was Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who received a unanimous 100% negative media coverage from ABC, NBC, and CBS evening newscasts. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for his part, received 89% negative media coverage. 

Musk’s Step Back

Musk is no stranger to negative media coverage, and so are his companies like Tesla. That being said, Musk stated during the Tesla Q1 2025 earnings call that he would be stepping back from DOGE’s day-to-day operations. Starting May, he would be spending more time at Tesla once more. 

“I think starting probably next month, May, my time allocation to DOGE will drop significantly… I think I’ll continue to spend a day or two per week on government matters for as long as the President would like me to do so and as long as it is useful. But starting next month, I’ll be allocating probably more of my time to Tesla,” Musk stated.

Continue Reading

Trending