Connect with us

Investor's Corner

Tesla’s steadily-improving Model 3 production ramp is starting to win over Wall St.

Published

on

True to Elon Musk’s words last month about the challenges Tesla faced during the Model 3 ramp, the company appears to be well on its way to leaving its self-imposed “production hell.” As Tesla’s Model 3 production shows more encouraging signs, Wall Street appears to be adopting an increasingly optimistic outlook on the electric car and energy company.

Amidst the noise surrounding Elon Musk’s tweets about the funding for Tesla’s possible privatization being secured, the company is steadily making progress in an area that matters a lot this Q3 — the Model 3 production ramp. Tesla is currently attempting to hit profitability this Q3, and being the vehicle expected to comprise most of Tesla’s electric car sales for the quarter, the Model 3 is key to this goal.

Tesla was finally able to hit its self-imposed target of producing 5,000 Model 3 per week during the final week of June. When the company released its Q2 production and deliveries report, some Wall St. analysts promptly expressed their doubts about the company’s capability to sustain the car’s optimum production rate. In the weeks that followed the release of the Q2 production and deliveries report, Tesla showed signs that it is capable of sustaining the optimum production pace of the Model 3. Hiring was ramped, more than 19,000 new Model 3 VINs were filed in a 2-week period, test drives for the Model 3 were started, and programs such as the 5-minute Sign & Drive delivery system were adopted. The Model 3’s sustained production was ultimately confirmed in the Q2 earnings call when Musk noted that Tesla was able to manufacture 5,000 Model 3 per week during “multiple weeks” in July.

Tesla has exhibited the same encouraging signs this August. Just recently, the company registered a record 16,000 new Model 3 VINs in a seven-day period — a feat that took the company roughly eight months to accomplish when it first started producing the electric car. Tesla appears to have begun initiatives to bring the Model 3 overseas as well, with viewings being scheduled for Australia and New Zealand. Even more recently, George Galliers of Evercore ISI, after a tour of the Fremont factory, released a note stating that Tesla is likely well on its way to achieving a steady weekly production rate of 5,000-6,000 Model 3 per week. The analyst even noted that despite the controversy over the company’s possible privatization, the fundamentals of Tesla’s operations are encouraging.

“Tesla seems well on the way to achieving a steady weekly production rate of 5,000 to 6,000 units per week. We are incrementally positive on Tesla following our visit. We have confidence in their production. We did not see anything to suggest that Model 3 cannot reach 6k units per week and 7k to 8k with very little incremental capital expenditure. Focusing on the fundamentals and setting aside talk of privatization, we are incrementally positive on Tesla following our visit.” 

The Evercore ISI analyst is not alone in his optimistic outlook on Tesla, either. Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, who previously had a $265 price target for Tesla stock (NASDAQ:TSLA), recently raised his price target for the company to $325 per share. Sacconaghi is not even an avid supporter of Elon Musk, being one of the analysts who attracted the CEO’s ire during the now-infamous Q1 earnings call, where he asked what Musk described as “boneheaded” questions.

Advertisement
-

Jefferies Financial Group also lifted their price objective for Tesla from a conservative $250 to an optimistic $360 in a report issued last week. The firm also gave Tesla stock a “Neutral” rating. Berenberg Bank reissued a “Buy” rating for Tesla stock, placing a price objective of $500 for the company’s shares. JPMorgan Chase & Co., which still has a “Sell” rating on TSLA, raised its price target to $308, a significant increase from its previous price target of $195.

While Tesla stock remains a battleground between the company’s supporters and critics, Wall Street seems to be showing signs that it is starting to adopt a more optimistic stance on the electric car maker. If the company’s new price targets from Wall Street are any indication, it appears that even firms that have been critical of Tesla are starting to recognize and acknowledge the progress the electric car maker is making. If Tesla nails its Model 3 targets this Q3 by sustaining the vehicle’s production at a rate of 5,000 units per week or more, Elon Musk’s vision of a profitable Tesla might actually come true. 

As of writing, Tesla stock is trading up 0.51% at $340.43 per share.

Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of TSLA and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

Tesla Cybercabs narrowly miss deadly Amazon cargo plane crash

An Amazon cargo plane crash near Miami’s airport stopped feet from dozens of Tesla Cybercabs.

Published

on

By

Photorealistic depiction of the Amazon Prime plane crash in Miami on Sep 3, 2026 near a fleet of Tesla Cybercab
Photorealistic depiction of the Amazon Prime plane crash in Miami on Sep 3, 2026 near a fleet of Tesla Cybercab

An Amazon Prime Air Boeing 767 cargo jet overran the runway at Miami International Airport on Sunday afternoon, killing five people and injuring five more. The jet, operated by North Carolina based carrier 21 Air as Flight 7598, touched down around 2 p.m. after arriving from San Juan, Puerto Rico, then crossed the airport perimeter, plowed across NW 67th Avenue and struck multiple vehicles before catching fire, according to the Associated Press.

Photos and video from the scene show the aircraft’s nose stopped within meters of a fenced staging lot holding dozens of gold painted Tesla Cybercabs, the steering wheel free robotaxi Tesla began putting on public roads in Austin last week. Miami-Dade Fire Rescue has confirmed the plane struck “multiple vehicles” but has not said whether any Cybercabs were among them, and neither Tesla nor airport officials have addressed the fleet directly.

The Cybercabs had not yet entered commercial service in Miami. Tesla’s existing Robotaxi operation there runs on modified Model Y vehicles and has been unsupervised since Ashok Elluswamy confirmed the detail on X in July.


Elon Musk offered the briefest of reactions. Replying to a Zero Hedge post about the Cybercabs sitting so close to the wreckage, he wrote a single word: “Weird.” He has not commented further, and Tesla has not issued a statement.

The timing puts Tesla’s newest vehicle near an unrelated but highly visible tragedy just days after its Austin debut, a launch that had already drawn scrutiny from federal regulators. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an audit how Tesla certified the Cybercab as compliant with federal vehicle safety standards, a process Teslarati covered after the vehicle’s September 3 launch event. That inquiry concerns the car’s lack of a steering wheel and pedals, not the Miami crash.

Advertisement
-

Investigators from the FAA and NTSB are focused on the plane, not the parking lot beside it. Flight data reviewed by outlets including Simple Flying show the 767 touched down around 170 knots, well above the 135 to 140 knot range typical for the aircraft, though investigators have not determined a cause. Amazon said it is working with authorities and that its priority is the safety of everyone affected.

Whether any Cybercabs were damaged, and what Tesla plans for the fleet parked near one of the country’s busiest airports, remain open questions.

Continue Reading

Featured

Tesla Cybercab is coming to Asia this month as US service officially begins

Tesla Asia says Cybercab will be on display in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing and Shanghai this month.

Published

on

By

Concept image of Tesla Cybercab in the streets of Hong Kong via Grok
Concept image of Tesla Cybercab in the streets of Hong Kong via Grok

Tesla’s Cybercab is heading to Asia. The official Tesla Asia account posted on X Thursday, inviting Cybercab fans to “Come experience the future of autonomy in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing & Shanghai.” The post went up within hours of Tesla’s own Cybercab milestone in Texas, where the company said Thursday it had begun offering rides in across Austin.

Exact dates and venues for the Asia tour haven’t been released yet, though Tesla Hong Kong replied to the announcement with “Cybercab will be on display in Hong Kong soon,” while Tesla Japan’s response pointed fans to a sign up page for updates. Neither post mentions test rides or a service area, and nothing so far suggests Tesla is launching Robotaxi operations in any of the four cities. Based on how Tesla has run past Cybercab tours, in Europe in late 2024 and at US shopping centers that same December, the Asia stops are almost certainly static displays at Tesla stores or public venues as a means to stimulate buzz for its future driverless ride-hailing service in the big cities.

The timing lines up with Tesla’s only prior Cybercab appearance in the region, a booth at the China International Import Expo in Shanghai last November, which Teslarati covered at the time. At that event, Tesla’s regional general manager for Shanghai framed the car as evidence of the company’s broader mission, a message Tesla has since formalized in its Master Plan Part IV, which states that “autonomous vehicles have the capacity to dramatically improve the affordability, availability and safety of transportation while reducing pollution, particularly in our increasingly dense global cities.” The same document is where Tesla lays out its “sustainable abundance” framing for Cybercab and Optimus alike, describing the two as the hardware behind an AI driven push to cut the cost of transportation and labor at scale.

Whether Cybercab actually operates as a robotaxi anywhere in Asia remains an open question, considering China has already pushed an autonomous ride-hailing market that’s run on homegrown players like Baidu’s Apollo Go and Pony AI. For now, the four city tour reads as a marketing push timed to Austin’s momentum.

Advertisement
-
Continue Reading

Elon Musk

OpenAI cites distrust of SpaceX in decision to drop Cursor partnership

OpenAI will cut SpaceX-owned Cursor’s model access in November, citing Musk’s history of broken contracts.

Published

on

By

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, announced late Friday that it is ending its partnership with Cursor, cutting off the coding tool’s access to its models on November 12. The move comes two weeks after SpaceX completed its $60 billion acquisition of Cursor’s parent company, Anysphere, folding the popular AI coding assistant into Elon Musk’s growing SpaceXAI division.

In a post on its website, OpenAI said the decision came down to trust, not technology. “We cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk’s companies violating contracts,” the company wrote. OpenAI pointed to two specific incidents: X, now part of SpaceX, allegedly breaking the terms of an existing OpenAI contract after Musk bought Twitter.

That lawsuit is the backdrop for all of this. Musk cofounded OpenAI in 2015, left the board in 2018, and sued Sam Altman and Greg Brockman in 2024, arguing they abandoned the company’s nonprofit mission for profit. A federal jury sided with OpenAI in May, finding Musk waited too long to sue rather than ruling on the merits of his claims. Musk said at the time he would appeal to the Ninth Circuit, calling the outcome a “calendar technicality” rather than a real judgment.

Elon Musk breaks silence on OpenAI trial decision

SpaceX’s interest in Cursor predates that verdict by weeks. The company first struck a deal with Cursor in April, securing an option to acquire it for $60 billion or pay $10 billion for joint development work instead. As Teslarati reported at the time, the logic was straightforward: Cursor was paying retail prices to Anthropic and OpenAI, two of its most direct competitors, every time a developer used its product, while SpaceX had idle capacity on its Colossus supercomputer, roughly the equivalent of a million Nvidia H100 GPUs, that Cursor could use to train its own models instead. SpaceX exercised the option in June, days after its own IPO, and the deal closed in mid-August.

Once it closed, Musk moved fast. On an all-hands call with more than 1,000 Cursor employees, he reportedly told staff that SpaceXAI’s Grok was playing catchup in the AI race, unlike Tesla and SpaceX in their own markets, and singled out Anthropic as the company to catch. Cursor CEO Michael Truell now reports directly to Musk inside SpaceXAI.

Advertisement
-

Elon Musk admits he was ‘clearly wrong’ about Anthropic

Losing OpenAI’s models leaves Cursor leaning harder on Anthropic’s Claude, which has its own compute agreement with SpaceX, and on Cursor’s in-house Composer model, the one SpaceX’s compute was supposed to accelerate in the first place. OpenAI framed the November deadline as maximum notice under its contract, and said it wants to “go above and beyond” to help developers through the transition. Whether Anthropic makes the same call is now the open question in AI coding.

Continue Reading