Connect with us

News

Tesla Model 3 adopted by German taxi operator over mass savings in fuel and maintenance costs

(Photo: Hojabr Riahi/Bild)

Published

on

Tesla Model S taxis now roam the streets of Dusseldorf as local operator Taxi Norman added two electric vehicles to its fleet, with plans to add 50 Model 3 emission-free taxis in the next few weeks.

While the company spent 105,000 euros for each of the Model S taxis and 45,000 euros each for the Tesla Model 3 units, the German operator began the switch to a green fleet not only to be more environment-friendly but to boost profits as well. With the support of the local government, Taxi Norman will only spend around 35 euros ($38) to charge each Tesla taxi a month compared to 750 euros ($830) of fuel per month for each of its diesel units. Overall, it can save the company around 36,000 euros (around $39,000) when the fuel expenditure of internal combustion taxis is compared to the cost of charging the same number of electric vehicles.

Aside from saving on fuel expenses, Taxi Norman will also save its bank account from maintenance costs.  “The cars are also much easier to care for. An old car costs us 6,000 euros ($6,600) a year. The expenses are now gone. We also save on fuel costs through cheaper electricity, ” said Managing Director Erol Norman.

Likewise, customers welcome the development. “Anyway, my drivers are totally satisfied. Customers are so enthusiastic about the driving experience in the electric car that they give higher tips. One received a tip of ten euros for a trip that cost seven euros,”  Norman added.

The investment in a greener taxi fleet is highly appreciated by the local government. Local Council member and Chairman of the Environment Committee Philipp Tacer promised to initiate taxi regulations that will further benefit the likes of Taxi Norman that invests in electric taxis. The local government plans to build taxi stops that will be exclusive for electric taxis

Taxi Norman operates a fleet of 150 vehicles in Dusseldorf and plans to complete the switch to electric taxis by 2023.

Advertisement
-

Looking at the overall picture, Germany has an ambitious goal of cutting its greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent compared to the 1990 levels come 2020 and one of its core strategies is to increase the share of renewable energies in total energy consumption. One crucial step in this strategy is to raise its renewable energy use in the transport sector.

While Germany delayed its goal of having one million electric vehicles on the road by 2020, the government shows great support for those who want to purchase EVs. Under a new agreement between the government and the car industry, Germany increased the subsidies for cars costing around $44,500 to around $6,700 from around $4,500. Incentives for pricier electric cars were also increased by 25%, however, EVs over 60,000 euros are not supported by the said program.

In the EU, the country is one of the frontrunners in the production of electric vehicles per capita. One can only expect a good boost in this aspect when Tesla begins the production of electric vehicles in its upcoming Gigafactory 4 in Brandenburg. The electric car manufacturer is just awaiting the last hurdles before clearing activities on the approved site begin.

A curious soul who keeps wondering how Elon Musk, Tesla, electric cars, and clean energy technologies will shape the future, or do we really need to escape to Mars.

Advertisement
Comments

News

Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile are trying to shut Starlink out before FCC vote

AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile want 290 MHz cut from an FCC satellite plan before Thursday.

Published

on

By

Starlink D2D direct to device vs Verizon, AT&T (Concept render by Grok)

AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile are asking the Federal Communications Commission to pull nearly 300 MHz of spectrum out of a proposal that would let satellite companies like SpaceX offer cell service directly to ordinary phones. The request lands one day before the agency votes on it.

The FCC will vote Thursday, October 29, on a notice of proposed rulemaking that would make an additional 482 MHz available for direct to device service, expanding the number of eligible bands from five to 13, according to the FCC fact sheet. It would also scrap the rule requiring a satellite operator to lease spectrum from carriers, replacing it with a certification that the operator has coexistence agreements in place or holds the terrestrial license itself.

That second path matters for SpaceX. As Teslarati reported earlier this month, SpaceX agreed to buy Grain Management’s nationwide 800 MHz portfolio to turn Starlink Mobile into a full US carrier, adding to the spectrum it already bought from EchoStar.

The carriers want two bands removed, 2.5 GHz and 3.45 GHz, which make up 290 MHz of the 482 MHz on the table. Through industry group CTIA, they argued that about 300 million users depend on those bands and that satellite operations in them are not technically feasible. T-Mobile, which calls 2.5 GHz the foundation of its Ultra Capacity 5G network, said in its own filing that satellite interference could wipe out up to 96% of a cell site’s uplink coverage area and cut uplink speeds by 88% to 99%.

Executives from all three carriers met with FCC staff on October 20, and T-Mobile CEO Srini Gopalan met separately with FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. T-Mobile’s role stands out because it is still SpaceX’s US launch partner for Starlink Mobile. The three carriers have also teamed up on their own satellite joint venture to pool spectrum, a move widely seen as a response to Starlink.

Advertisement
-

SpaceX is asking for the opposite. In an October 23 filing after meetings with FCC staff and commissioners’ offices, the company asked regulators to add the 902 to 928 MHz band to the proposal. “Doing so now saves time later,” SpaceX wrote. The company also asked the FCC to modernize interference rules and align satellite deployment requirements with those for terrestrial cell networks, saying the goal is to let satellite and ground networks work together so Americans stay connected wherever they are.

The carriers have not been shy about how they view SpaceX as a competitor. On Verizon’s third quarter earnings call Monday, its chief executive said Starlink Mobile “just can’t compete with a terrestrial network” and estimated SpaceX would need four to six years and $300 billion to $500 billion to build a full US carrier network.

Thursday’s vote will not settle which bands survive. Adopting the notice opens a public comment period, with final rules to come later in the proceeding. The FCC already considered and rejected 2.5 GHz for satellite coverage once, in 2024. SpaceX also is not the only satellite player watching: the FCC approved Amazon’s $11.6 billion acquisition of Globalstar on October 27, giving its planned direct to device fleet its own mobile satellite spectrum.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla Semi catches fire in California: what we know

Published

on

Credit: KTVU

A Tesla Semi caught fire in Hayward, California, which caused both directions of traffic to shut down for hours before being completely reopened early on Wednesday, the California Highway Patrol said.

The fire occurred just after 5:30 local time in Hayward on Tuesday, as the Semi caught fire in the southbound lanes of I-880 before CHP officials made the decision to shut down both lanes of traffic due to potential risks from hazardous chemical smoke.

There were no injuries reported.

The cause of the fire is currently unknown, as neither Tesla nor the CHP have not determined a cause.

However, some images taken before the Semi was completely destroyed by the fire seem to indicate this might have been an older unit, as it appears to be one of the designs that Tesla shipped as part of its pilot program, before revising it and starting mass production just a month ago.

At the time of publication, CHP had not returned our request for a comment for additional details, including the Semi involved and any potential collaboration on an investigation between the CHP and Tesla. We will update this story when we hear back from them.

The southbound lanes were reopened at 3:30 a.m. on Wednesday, with the northbound lanes opening last night a few hours after the fire began. The CHP did state that the lithium batteries were “incredibly difficult to extinguish,” according to NBC Bay Area.

The truck’s driver said that the Semi caught fire, but he did not have an explanation.

An estimated 5,000 to 7,000 semi-truck and large commercial vehicle fires occur on U.S. roadways every year.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla’s ‘Emergency Drive Away’ function gets its first use in the real world

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla’s launch of the “Emergency Drive Away” function a few months back offered owners a safe option to evacuate an area if they were in reasonable danger. The function finally got its first use in the real world, but it appears it was by mistake.

A video shared by u/Joshalander in the r/TeslaLounge subreddit recorded the instance from his vehicle and said the incident took place in Austin this past weekend during the city’s F1 Race.

“Was charging around 6 AM this past Sunday in Austin before heading to the F1 race and heard a pop. Looked over and saw the new emergency drive-away feature in action. Genuinely felt bad for the dude when he got out and realized what happened, since he looked exhausted and only seemed to half-read the prompts.”

Emergency Drive Away unlatches the Supercharger connector from the vehicle, but still causes damage to both the car and the Supercharger. Tesla has said that it will cost up to $25,000 in repairs to have everything fixed back to normal.

Additionally, the company said that if it were not used in an emergency situation, the driver of the vehicle who activated the Emergency Drive Away feature would be responsible for all repair costs.

Tesla constitutes the following situations as reasonable justifications for activating the feature:

  • You face an immediate threat to your life or personal safety.
  • You must leave the area immediately.
  • Exiting the vehicle is unsafe.
  • Unplugging the charge connector would unreasonably delay your departure or expose you to a risk to your personal safety.

After using the feature, Tesla requires the driver to schedule Service so the car can be inspected.

Continue Reading