News
Tesla Model S, Porsche Taycan, & other EVs populate list of fastest-accelerating cars in the world
It may seem inconceivable today, but there was once a time when the idea of an electric car having brutally quick acceleration is far-fetched. Prior to the original Tesla Roadster, which broke through the market with its 0-60 mph time of 4.0 seconds, electric vehicles were largely considered as nothing but fancy golf carts. Green, a bit techy, but very little else.
Thanks in no small part to Tesla’s efforts, electricity is widely considered today as the propulsion of choice for tomorrow’s cars. No longer are EVs glorified golf carts. They now represent the best that the auto industry has to offer, and they have garnered a reputation for humbling petrol-powered supercars on the quarter-mile. Even hypercars that are expected to be released in the coming years are, for the most part, electric.
This trend is represented very well in a recent list compiled by UK-based motoring publication Autocar. Established in 1895 and widely considered as the world’s oldest car magazine, Autocar has a prominent voice in auto. And ultimately, this is really what makes the publication’s recent list of fastest-accelerating cars so compelling. This time around, the list is downright populated with electric and electrified cars instead of petrol-powered vehicles.
To make it into the British magazine’s list, a car must boast a 0-60 mph time below 3.0 seconds. They must also be production vehicles. This completely eliminates one-off, hyper-customized ICE-powered drag racers. Each car in Autocar UK‘s list must be frighteningly quick out of the factory. And they are. A lot of them just happened to be electric.
Immediately noticeable in the motoring publication’s list is the Tesla Model S, the Silicon Valley-based company’s flagship sedan. The Raven Tesla Model S Performance remains one of the quickest production vehicles today, sprinting from 0-60 mph in 2.4 seconds. The Porsche Taycan Turbo S, another frighteningly quick electric sedan, also stood proudly on the Autocar UK list. Apart from these two, the Rimac Concept One, arguably one of the first genuinely all-electric supercars in the market, also held a spot in the publication’s rankings.
But the story does not end there. A look at the full rankings from the motoring magazine shows that 9 out of the 16 vehicles mentioned in the publication’s actual list has an electric motor. A special section following the full list of fastest-accelerating cars, which posts upcoming vehicles that will likely dominate in 0-60 mph times, is also dominated by electric vehicles. In fact, all four of the contenders for the next-generation of fastest-accelerating cars in the magazine are all-electric.
With results such as these, it is difficult to argue against the fact that the future of the auto industry is electric. With vehicles like the Tesla Model 3 sedan and Model Y crossover attacking the mainstream market, there is a good chance that EVs will become more and more ubiquitous in the coming years. The time when electric cars are considered as just “cars” is likely at hand, and when this happens, one can bet that an internal combustion engine will be nowhere near the list of fastest-accelerating cars in the world.
Elon Musk
SpaceX issues statement on Starship V3 Booster 18 anomaly
The incident unfolded during gas-system pressure testing at the company’s Massey facility in Starbase, Texas.
SpaceX has issued an initial statement about Starship Booster 18’s anomaly early Friday. The incident unfolded during gas-system pressure testing at the company’s Massey facility in Starbase, Texas.
SpaceX’s initial comment
As per SpaceX in a post on its official account on social media platform X, Booster 18 was undergoing gas system pressure tests when the anomaly happened. Despite the nature of the incident, the company emphasized that no propellant was loaded, no engines were installed, and personnel were kept at a safe distance from the booster, resulting in zero injuries.
“Booster 18 suffered an anomaly during gas system pressure testing that we were conducting in advance of structural proof testing. No propellant was on the vehicle, and engines were not yet installed. The teams need time to investigate before we are confident of the cause. No one was injured as we maintain a safe distance for personnel during this type of testing. The site remains clear and we are working plans to safely reenter the site,” SpaceX wrote in its post on X.
Incident and aftermath
Livestream footage from LabPadre showed Booster 18’s lower half crumpling around the liquid oxygen tank area at approximately 4:04 a.m. CT. Subsequent images posted by on-site observers revealed extensive deformation across the booster’s lower structure. Needless to say, spaceflight observers have noted that Booster 18 would likely be a complete loss due to its anomaly.
Booster 18 had rolled out only a day earlier and was one of the first vehicles in the Starship V3 program. The V3 series incorporates structural reinforcements and reliability upgrades intended to prepare Starship for rapid-reuse testing and eventual tower-catch operations. Elon Musk has been optimistic about Starship V3, previously noting on X that the spacecraft might be able to complete initial missions to Mars.
Investor's Corner
Tesla analyst maintains $500 PT, says FSD drives better than humans now
The team also met with Tesla leaders for more than an hour to discuss autonomy, chip development, and upcoming deployment plans.
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) received fresh support from Piper Sandler this week after analysts toured the Fremont Factory and tested the company’s latest Full Self-Driving software. The firm reaffirmed its $500 price target, stating that FSD V14 delivered a notably smooth robotaxi demonstration and may already perform at levels comparable to, if not better than, average human drivers.
The team also met with Tesla leaders for more than an hour to discuss autonomy, chip development, and upcoming deployment plans.
Analysts highlight autonomy progress
During more than 75 minutes of focused discussions, analysts reportedly focused on FSD v14’s updates. Piper Sandler’s team pointed to meaningful strides in perception, object handling, and overall ride smoothness during the robotaxi demo.
The visit also included discussions on updates to Tesla’s in-house chip initiatives, its Optimus program, and the growth of the company’s battery storage business. Analysts noted that Tesla continues refining cost structures and capital expenditure expectations, which are key elements in future margin recovery, as noted in a Yahoo Finance report.
Analyst Alexander Potter noted that “we think FSD is a truly impressive product that is (probably) already better at driving than the average American.” This conclusion was strengthened by what he described as a “flawless robotaxi ride to the hotel.”
Street targets diverge on TSLA
While Piper Sandler stands by its $500 target, it is not the highest estimate on the Street. Wedbush, for one, has a $600 per share price target for TSLA stock.
Other institutions have also weighed in on TSLA stock as of late. HSBC reiterated a Reduce rating with a $131 target, citing a gap between earnings fundamentals and the company’s market value. By contrast, TD Cowen maintained a Buy rating and a $509 target, pointing to strong autonomous driving demonstrations in Austin and the pace of software-driven improvements.
Stifel analysts also lifted their price target for Tesla to $508 per share over the company’s ongoing robotaxi and FSD programs.
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Version 3 booster crumples in early testing
Photos of the incident’s aftermath suggest that Booster 18 will likely be retired.
SpaceX’s new Starship first-stage booster, Booster 18, suffered major damage early Friday during its first round of testing in Starbase, Texas, just one day after rolling out of the factory.
Based on videos of the incident, the lower section of the rocket booster appeared to crumple during a pressurization test. Photos of the incident’s aftermath suggest that Booster 18 will likely be retired.
Booster test failure
SpaceX began structural and propellant-system verification tests on Booster 18 Thursday night at the Massey’s Test Site, only a few miles from Starbase’s production facilities, as noted in an Ars Technica report. At 4:04 a.m. CT on Friday, a livestream from LabPadre Space captured the booster’s lower half experiencing a sudden destructive event around its liquid oxygen tank section. Post-incident images, shared on X by @StarshipGazer, showed notable deformation in the booster’s lower structure.
Neither SpaceX nor Elon Musk had commented as of Friday morning, but the vehicle’s condition suggests it is likely a complete loss. This is quite unfortunate, as Booster 18 is already part of the Starship V3 program, which includes design fixes and upgrades intended to improve reliability. While SpaceX maintains a rather rapid Starship production line in Starbase, Booster 18 was generally expected to validate the improvements implemented in the V3 program.
Tight deadlines
SpaceX needs Starship boosters and upper stages to begin demonstrating rapid reuse, tower catches, and early operational Starlink missions over the next two years. More critically, NASA’s Artemis program depends on an on-orbit refueling test in the second half of 2026, a requirement for the vehicle’s expected crewed lunar landing around 2028.
While SpaceX is known for diagnosing failures quickly and returning to testing at unmatched speed, losing the newest-generation booster at the very start of its campaign highlights the immense challenge involved in scaling Starship into a reliable, high-cadence launch system. SpaceX, however, is known for getting things done quickly, so it would not be a surprise if the company manages to figure out what happened to Booster 18 in the near future.
SpaceX issues statement on Starship V3 Booster 18 anomaly
Tesla analyst maintains $500 PT, says FSD drives better than humans now
