Connect with us

News

The saga continues with Model X driver involved in Montana crash

Published

on

Mr. Pang is back this time with a second open letter to Tesla

The Tesla Model X driver involved in a Montana crash while using Autopilot is stirring up controversy once again this time asking Tesla Motors to reveal additional details from the incident. It seems that language differences play a large role in this dispute. Acting as his representative, Steven XuΒ sentΒ usΒ a second open letter Mr. Pang penned to Elon Musk, in which he takes issue with Tesla’s account of the accident. The open letter reads as follows:

Here is the second letter from my friend, Mr.Pang.

To Tesla Team:

It has been weeks since I published the letter. No one has ever triedΒ to contact us and discus about the crash. To fully understand the reason thatΒ caused this crash is critical for all tesla drivers. After awhile teslaΒ published a response towards our letter. Most of parts are fit into the story. HoweverΒ there are few points that I would like to point out.

Advertisement

“From this data, we learned thatΒ after you engaged Autosteer, your hands were not detected on the steering wheelΒ for over two minutes. This is contrary to the terms of use when first enablingΒ the feature and the visual alert presented you every time Autosteer isΒ activated.”

I admit that my hands were out of steering wheel after I engagedΒ autopilot. The reason that I was doing that is because I put too much faith inΒ this system. I also believe most Tesla driver would do the something when they
engage autopilot including Elon. The problem here is that Tesla had overΒ advertised this feature by calling it “autopilot”. This feature should named “advanceΒ driving assistant”. It is possible that Tesla had known accident like thisΒ would come sooner or later. Tesla might think that setting up the term byΒ saying “please put hands on steering wheel at all time” would be response freeΒ for Tesla.

2、 As road conditions became increasingly uncertain, the vehicle againΒ alerted you to put your hands on the wheel.

The road condition was better than fine. Lane mark is absolutely clear.Β Road is flat and there is no incoming car. No matter what my sight was neverΒ out of the road. However everything was happened too fast for me to take control.Β Everything happened in less than a second.

Advertisement

3、No steering torque was then detected until Autosteer was disabled withΒ an abrupt steering action. Immediately following detection of the first impact,Β adaptive cruise control was also disabled, the vehicle began to slow, and youΒ applied the brake pedal.

No one should avoid the cause of the malfunction of autopilot feature.Β Since you start explaining it, I realize that you are implying that some sortΒ of force was applied to the steering wheel by me. I had no idea how Tesla gotΒ this clue. There are two points I want to make here. First, my hands were notΒ on the steering wheel. Second no obstacle was on the road to alter the steeringΒ wheel direction. The one and the only one that was taking control of thisΒ entire vehicle and steering it away from the road is autopilot software itself.Β Somehow I realize if my hands were on the steering wheel with a force, wouldΒ Tesla blame me for the collision? To me it looks like that if an accident occurΒ by autopilot, either hands are on or not on the steering wheel, Tesla can always find a way out by saying β€œabrupt steering action”.

Tesla also claimed that “abrupt steering adaptive cruise control wasΒ also disabled, the vehicle began to slow.”

This is nowhere near the truth. The real thing is that vehicle wasΒ NEVER attended to slow from hitting the first pole towards the last. It only tookΒ about a second to hit 12 wood poles. I believe if it wasn’t me who brake theΒ vehicle it would continued cruising. Mr. Huang was injured severely due to highΒ speed impact.

Advertisement

Tesla as a global impact company should respect the truth of everyΒ incident. Nothing is more important hand human life. Lying or manipulating towardsΒ public about what really happened is unacceptable.

Weeks ago I got contacted by Tesla regarding this accident. Since you cannotΒ find a mandarin translator, we rearranged the call again in four hours. HoweverΒ that was the last time when Tesla tries to contact me. What I am asking is toΒ fully reveal the driving data from the collision. Reliability of Autopilot softwareΒ matters to hundreds and thousands of Tesla drivers. I wish to know the entireΒ story about what really happened on us on that collision.

Thanks

Sincerely
Mr. Pang

Advertisement

Steven Xu pointed us to comments being made on the Tesla Motors Club forum thatΒ seeminglyΒ offers Mr. Pang no support at all. In fact, based on those comments, there almost seems to be a cultural bias in play in this situation. One wonders if perhaps things would seem different if they were driving a car in China that only displayed instructions in Mandarin.

Pang’s complaint is very similar to one lodged by a Chinese customer last month whose Tesla crashed on the highway on the way to work. He claimed that the salesman he spoke to before purchasing his car told him specifically that the car could drive itself and proved it by driving with his hands off the wheel during a test drive. Tesla later amended the language it uses to describe its Autopilot system on its Chinese website. It’s possible that same linguistic confusion has a bearing on Mr. Pang’s unfortunate accident.

At this point, it seems the matter will be handled by insurance companies and lawyers. Tesla apparently has had no further contact with Pang. Through Steven, Pang says, “Weeks ago I got contacted by Tesla regarding this accident. Since you cannotΒ find a Mandarin translator, we re-arranged the call again in four hours. However,Β that was the last time when Tesla tries to contact me.

“What I am asking is toΒ fully reveal the driving data from the collision. Reliability of Autopilot software
matters to hundreds and thousands of Tesla drivers. I wish to know the entireΒ story about what really happened on us on that collision.”

Advertisement

"I write about technology and the coming zero emissions revolution."

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

Tesla Full Self-Driving set to get an awesome new feature, Elon Musk says

Published

on

Credit: Teslarati

Tesla Full Self-Driving is set to get an awesome new feature in the near future, CEO Elon Musk confirmed on X.

Full Self-Driving is the company’s semi-autonomous driving program, which is among the best available to the general public. It still relies on the driver to ultimately remain in control and pay attention, but it truly does make traveling less stressful and easier.

However, Tesla still continuously refines the software through Over-the-Air updates, which are meant to resolve shortcomings in the performance of the FSD suite. Generally, Tesla does a great job of this, but some updates are definitely regressions, at least with some of the features.

Tesla Cybertruck owner credits FSD for saving life after freeway medical emergency

Advertisement

Tesla and Musk are always trying to improve the suite’s performance by fixing features that are presently available, but they also try to add new things that would be beneficial to owners. One of those things, which is coming soon, is giving the driver the ability to prompt FSD with voice demands.

For example, asking the car to park close to the front door of your destination, or further away in an empty portion of the parking lot, would be an extremely beneficial feature. Adjusting navigation is possible through Grok integration, but it is not always effective.

Musk confirmed that voice prompts for FSD would be possible:

Tesla Full Self-Driving is a really great thing, but it definitely has its shortcomings. Navigation is among the biggest complaints that owners have, and it is easily my biggest frustration with using it. Some of the routes it chooses to take are truly mind-boggling.

Another thing it has had issues with is being situated in the correct lane at confusing intersections or even managing to properly navigate through local traffic signs. For example, in Pennsylvania, there are a lot of stop signs with “Except Right Turn” signs directly under.

This gives those turning right at a stop sign the opportunity to travel through it. FSD has had issues with this on several occasions.

Advertisement

Parking preferences would be highly beneficial and something that could be resolved with this voice prompt program. Grocery stores are full of carts not taken back by customers, and many people choose to park far away. Advising FSD of this preference would be a great advantage to owners.

Continue Reading

Cybertruck

Elon Musk clarifies Tesla Cybertruck ’10 day’ comment, fans respond

Some are arguing that the decision to confirm a price hike in ten days is sort of counterproductive, especially considering it is based on demand. Giving consumers a timeline of just ten days to make a big purchase like a pickup truck for $60,000, and basically stating the price will go up, will only push people to make a reservation.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Elon Musk has clarified what he meant by his comment on X yesterday that seemed to indicate that Tesla would either do away with the new All-Wheel-Drive configuration of the Cybertruck or adjust the price.

The response was cryptic as nobody truly knew what Musk’s plans were for the newest Tesla Cybertruck trim level. We now have that answer, and fans of the company are responding in a polarizing fashion.

On Thursday night, Tesla launched the Cybertruck All-Wheel-Drive, priced competitively at $59,990. It was a vast improvement from the Rear-Wheel-Drive configuration Tesla launched last year at a similar price point, which was eventually cancelled just a few months later due to low demand.

Tesla launches new Cybertruck trim with more features than ever for a low price

Advertisement

However, Musk said early on Friday, “just for 10 days,” the truck would either be available or priced at $59,990. We can now confirm Tesla will adjust the price based on more recent comments from the CEO.

Musk said the price will fluctuate, but it “depends on how much demand we see at this price level.”

Advertisement

Some are defending the decision, stating that it is simply logical to see how the Cybertruck sells at this price and adjust accordingly.

Advertisement

Others, not so much.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Some are arguing that the decision to confirm a price hike in ten days is sort of counterproductive, especially considering it is based on demand. Giving consumers a timeline of just ten days to make a big purchase like a pickup truck for $60,000, and basically stating the price will go up, will only push people to make a reservation.

Demand will look strong because people want to lock in this price. The price will inevitably go up, and demand for the trim will likely fall a bit because of the increased cost.

Many are arguing Musk should have kept this detail internal, but transparency is a good policy to have. It is a polarizing move to confirm a price increase in just a week-and-a-half, but the community is obviously split on how to feel.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Cybertruck

Tesla Cybertruck’s newest trim will undergo massive change in ten days, Musk says

It appears as if the new All-Wheel-Drive trim of Cybertruck won’t be around for too long, however. Elon Musk revealed this morning that it will be around “only for the next 10 days.”

Published

on

(Credit: Tesla)

Tesla’s new Cybertruck trim has already gotten the axe from CEO Elon Musk, who said the All-Wheel-Drive configuration of the all-electric pickup will only be available “for the next ten days.”

Musk could mean the price, which is $59,990, or the availability of the trim altogether.

Last night, Tesla launched the All-Wheel-Drive configuration of the Cybertruck, a pickup that comes in at less than $60,000 and features a competitive range and features that are not far off from the offerings of the premium trim.

Tesla launches new Cybertruck trim with more features than ever for a low price

Advertisement

It was a nice surprise from Tesla, considering that last year, it offered a Rear-Wheel-Drive trim of the Cybertruck that only lasted a few months. It had extremely underwhelming demand because it was only $10,000 cheaper than the next trim level up, and it was missing a significant number of premium features.

Simply put, it was not worth the money. Tesla killed the RWD Cybertruck just a few months after offering it.

With the news that Tesla was offering this All-Wheel-Drive configuration of the Cybertruck, many fans and consumers were encouraged. The Cybertruck has been an underwhelming seller, and this seemed to be a lot of truck for the price when looking at its features:

  • Dual Motor AWD w/ est. 325 mi of range
  • Powered tonneau cover
  • Bed outlets (2x 120V + 1x 240V) & Powershare capability
  • Coil springs w/ adaptive damping
  • Heated first-row seats w/ textile material that is easy to clean
  • Steer-by-wire & Four Wheel Steering
  • 6’ x 4’ composite bed
  • Towing capacity of up to 7,500 lbs
  • Powered frunk

It appears as if this trim of Cybertruck won’t be around for too long, however. Musk revealed this morning that it will be around “only for the next 10 days.”

Musk could mean the price of the truck and not necessarily the ability to order it. However, most are taking it as a cancellation.

If it is, in fact, a short-term availability decision, it is baffling, especially as Tesla fans and analysts claim that metrics like quarterly deliveries are no longer important. This seems like a way to boost sales short-term, and if so many people are encouraged about this offering, why would it be kept around for such a short period of time?

Some are even considering the potential that Tesla axes the Cybertruck program as a whole. Although Musk said during the recent Q4 Earnings Call that Cybertruck would still be produced, the end of the Model S and Model X programs indicates Tesla might be prepared to do away with any low-volume vehicles that do not contribute to the company’s future visions of autonomy.

Advertisement

The decision to axe the car just ten days after making it available seems like a true head-scratcher.

Continue Reading