News
Tesla Model Y silently slays screaming V12 Lamborghini in the quarter mile
The Tesla Model Y Performance may be the electric car maker’s most conservative “P” branded vehicle in its lineup today, but the all electric crossover is no slouch. With its 0-60 mph time of 3.5 seconds, the top tier Model Y has enough acceleration to battle high performance vehicles on the quarter mile. This was put to the test recently, when the Model Y Performance faced off with a literal supercar, a V12 Lamborghini Murciélago.
If one were to look at the Model Y and the Murciélago side by side, one would likely think that a race between the two vehicles will heavily favor the Italian supercar. The Model Y is a crossover, after all, and it looks very tame compared to the Lamborghini, with its rather heavyset look that is reminiscent of a Model 3 that ate a little bit too much for dinner. But that being said, the Tesla Model Y has the advantage of instant torque from its electric motors, which gives it an advantage in drag races.
Such a race was featured recently on YouTube’s DragTimes channel. Brooks Weisblat, the host of the channel, was behind the wheel of the Model Y Performance, while one of his friends was behind the wheel of the Lamborghini. Specs wise, it seemed like the V12 supercar would have the race in the bag, with its 6.2 liter V12 engine and Flame Tune, which gave the car ~570 hp. The Murciélago commanded a supercar worthy price during its production, with its sticker price of $279,000.
The Model Y, on the other hand, is fitted with two electric motors that make a combined 473 hp. The all electric crossover’s battery also had an 89% state of charge. The Model Y is only a fraction of the V12 Lamborghini’s cost, with its $62,000 price. That’s a premium price for a crossover, but that’s not too bad considering that it’s a vehicle that could potentially give a fight to supercars on the drag strip.
Based on the Model Y Performance and Lamborghini Murciélago’s race, it seems that Tesla’s most conservative “P” branded vehicle could actually give a good fight to a supercar on the drag strip. The Model Y Performance completed the quarter mile in 11.928 seconds, while the V12 Lamborghini finished the race in 14.105 seconds. By the end of the race, the Model Y was traveling at 114.71 mph, while the Lamborghini Murciélago was traveling at 118.78 mph.
Of course, a good part of this result is due to the Weisblat’s excellent reaction time, as well as the fact that the Lamborghini ended up with a less than stellar launch. That being said, it’s still quite impressive to see the Model Y Performance gripping the drag strip with its tires and launching like a silent rocket all the way to the end of the race.
Watch the Tesla Model Y battle the Lamborghini Murciélago in the video below.
-
Elon Musk has updated his timeline for when humans will walk on Mars and for when ships will simply get there.
The objective of getting to Mars has been one of Musk’s biggest goals since becoming a serial entrepreneur and realizing that time on Earth is limited. Musk has said several times he hopes to die on Mars, and not by impact.
Musk now believes that people will be on Mars in “roughly 5 to 7 years.” He said that a Mars lander will get there “a few years sooner.”
People on Mars in roughly 5 to 7 years.
Mars lander a few years sooner.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 29, 2026
The response from Musk comes after NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said that SpaceX’s biggest priority is the Moon and not Mars. Because of this, Isaacman conceded that he believes nuclear power and propulsion investments will provide “potentially the pathway with the fewest miracles required to put four people on Mars in the next 10 to 15 years.”
Of course, this is what NASA can do through taxpayer funding and nuclear investments, he added.
Musk’s grand ambitions are much more optimistic than most, and it is certainly a double-edged sword. This is not the first time timelines for Mars have been somewhat lofty, especially to those normal thinkers like you and me, not super geniuses like Musk.
In fact, the SpaceX and Tesla frontman has said on at least a dozen occasions that we could be on Mars in the coming years. Musk said 2020 would be the big year as early as 2009. In 2020, he was “highly confident” of a landing in 2026, and had even said 2024 in a best-case scenario.
The point is, the range has varied, and it’s anyone’s guess when we’ll get there. This latest adjustment to the timeline is typical of Musk, and while the Moon has seemingly taken priority over Mars, it is still worth mentioning that the ultimate goal is to make life multiplanetary, and it starts potentially with the Red Planet.
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) got an absolutely crazy price target rating from Raymond James after the company experienced a tough first few weeks following its Initial Public Offering (IPO).
Despite the tumultuous start, SpaceX has plenty of believers, and the company’s massively successful Starship launch last Friday, its 13th test flight of the massive rocket, went so smoothly that Raymond James analysts pushed its price target on the company to roughly 7 times its current trading level.
SpaceX Starship just nailed something it’s never done before
The firm officially put a “Strong Buy” rating and an $800 price target on the stock. It currently trades at around $113. Its all-time high is $225.64, reaching this trading level shortly after shares first went public.
Raymond James’ price target is tied to the firm’s confidence after Starship’s 13th test flight. Analysts at the firm said it was an incremental step that reduces engineering risks, citing the widely successful heat shield test that CEO Elon Musk recently detailed, the smooth deployment of Starlink V3 satellites, and a successful in-space engine relight.
SpaceX also managed to see Starship splash down safely in the Indian Ocean, while the Super Heavy Booster fell down to the Gulf of America with no incidents.
It is interesting to see these launches have such a tremendous impact on the stock and what investors think of it. After SpaceX initially delayed the Starship launch last week, shares fell tremendously. Most probably did not realize that the stand-down is a standard practice, especially if everything is not perfect.
The mission was initially aborted due to an issue with Raptor engines. This was resolved, and Starship launched last Friday after another delay on Thursday, which was caused by weather.
Now that analysts have seen what SpaceX launches are capable of and how impressive the feat is, firms are adjusting their price targets accordingly, making it known that they have high expectations for the space exploration company.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has responded to reports that Volvo is officially discontinuing the LiDAR sensor on two of its cars.
Volvo announced that it would officially scrap LiDAR systems on its EX90 and ES90 vehicles in various markets. In Norway, owners will get a €1,800 compensation for features that will never arrive due to this decision. There will be no option to remove the unit from vehicles, either.
The issue stems from Volvo’s supplier, Luminar, and its bankruptcy filing. Luminar will no longer be able to supply LiDAR units to Volvo for the EX90 and ES90, effectively axing any use the unit has on vehicles. Volvo will phase out the data collection processes via the LiDAR system, and it will not be utilized whatsoever.
Musk saw the story on X and responded, stating:
“I did try to warn them. Humans drive using neural nets and optical sensors. Same is true for robot cars.”
I did try to warn them.
Humans drive using neural nets and optical sensors. Same is true for robot cars.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 29, 2026
Musk has been publicly vocal about his disdain for LiDAR systems, once calling them “a fool’s errand,” as he has consistently kept the outlook that they are not needed for effective self-driving.
The typical example used as evidence for this by Musk is humans themselves: made with only eyes and memories, humans are capable of navigating a car by using what they can see and what they’ve personally experienced on the road.
Elon Musk argues lidar and radar make self driving cars more dangerous
“Same is true for robot cars,” Musk says, as Teslas have eight exterior cameras that help see everything surrounding the vehicle, and a neural network that analyzes behavior and tendencies with every mile driven.
Tesla is a vision-only self-driving company that ditched sensors and radar several years ago in favor of cameras. Behind this effort, the company has established a reputation for having one of the most robust self-driving platforms in the world.
Musk’s big bet with Tesla on its self-driving program’s strategy has widely paid off. Other companies continue to utilize things like LiDAR, radar, and sensors for effective self-driving, but Tesla has shown that there is more than one way to give consumers a strong and accurate driver assistance suite.
The real question is: who will be the first company to take Musk’s advice and attempt a self-driving platform based on cameras only, or even license FSD for themselves?
Elon Musk updates the SpaceX timeline for Mars
SpaceX gets an absolutely crazy price target after rough IPO
