Investor's Corner
Tesla’s Autopilot probe worries Morgan Stanley with ‘reputational risks’
The recently launched Tesla Autopilot probe by the NHTSA is said to be a greater threat to the automaker’s reputation than its financial situation, according to a new note from Morgan Stanley. Headed by analyst Adam Jonas, the note outlines the potential risks that Tesla could face with the probe, which intends to investigate 11 instances of Autopilot-equipped cars crashing into emergency vehicles, according to the documents.
The note outlines four potential risk factors that Tesla could face in a long and drawn-out battle to clear its name of any wrongdoing. In the initial years of autonomous driving development, nearly any instance of a vehicle being involved in an accident has increased skepticism over the potential of future self-driving cars. While Tesla Autopilot only operates on Level 2 autonomy, with Level 5 being a fully operational self-driving machine, the company admittedly states that drivers should still remain alert while the vehicle is in operation, never taking their eyes off the road.
However, this is not the instance for every driver. While Autopilot vehicles from Tesla were involved in accidents on a significantly less-frequent occasion than the national average based on NHTSA statistics, Tesla vehicles involved in accidents seem to catch more media attention than any other instance on the road. After all, we don’t hear about every Chevy Malibu or Ford F-150 crash that occurs, but the false narrative that Teslas drive themselves still floats around in the form of catchy headlines or misleading articles.
The chance for reputational risks is one of the most notable points of the Morgan Stanley note and is the point that the analysts expand on the most. “Vehicle safety actions and recalls (both voluntary and involuntary) are a fact of life in the auto industry, despite cars achieving greater capability and quality over time. While we are not making any changes to our Tesla model and price target at this time, the NHTSA serves as a reminder to investors about the importance of vehicle safety as we turn over greater portions of driving to software in a network,” the note said.
A Tesla Model 3 on Autopilot. [Credit: LivingTesla/YouTube]
Of course, semi-autonomous vehicles, and autonomy in general for automotive, is a young and relatively new feature in the world of cars. There are bound to be mistakes and incidents just as there were with early vehicles. Accidents happen, but the early adopters of motor vehicles did not give up on the task of making them better and safer, and that’s precisely what will happen as more companies take a crack at the potential autonomous driving sector.
“The regulatory, legal, and moral/ethical nuances are difficult, if not impossible, to model. As human driving transitions to computer driving, accident frequency is expected to decline by 90% or more (some experts insist accident frequency must ultimately fall by greater than 99.9%). At the same time, accident ‘fault’ transitions from someone to something,” the note also states. “Just our view, but there is no moral equivalency between a ‘human-caused’ traffic fatality and a ‘system-caused’ traffic fatality. Over time, we believe the industry should be in position to provide vehicle data for 3rd party validation to prove the significant societal/health and safety benefits of autonomy.
Morgan Stanley on the NHTSA probe ??$TSLA pic.twitter.com/wF9r2fuMsq
— David Tayar (@davidtayar5) August 18, 2021
As noted yesterday in an interview with former Ford CEO Mark Fields, the NHTSA study into Tesla could take up to 18 months. Morgan Stanley reiterates this point in its note, especially with Autopilot’s “high profile nature.” Unfortunately, Tesla’s flashy name and mainstream personality as an automaker, especially a revolutionary one, has put them at center stage for this kind of attention. Those with a reasonable platform may not understand all of the functionalities or safety precautions of Autopilot’s nature. Still, unfortunately, many of the accidents are being described as the software’s fault, although many of the instances are actually driver errors.
At the time of writing, TSLA stock was trading at $689.79, up over 3.6%.
Disclosure: Joey Klender is a TSLA Shareholder.
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 aborted at Zero and Musk just told us what broke
Four Raptor engines failed to ignite at T-zero, forcing SpaceX to scrub Starship Flight 13 Thursday.
SpaceX scrubbed the Starship Flight 13 launch attempt Thursday evening at the last possible moment, after four of the Super Heavy booster’s 33 Raptor 3 engines failed to ignite during the startup sequence. The 90-minute window had opened at 6:45 p.m. EDT from Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, and the countdown had proceeded without issue all day, with more than 11.5 million pounds of liquid methane and liquid oxygen being fully loaded into the rocket before the automated abort triggered. SpaceX’s launch directors posted on X, “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt,” and shut down the livestream shortly after.
Musk confirmed the root cause within hours. “Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort,” he wrote on X. “To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed and replaced. Most probable launch timing is early next week.” SpaceX engineers began draining propellant tanks immediately and Booster 20 was rolled back to its hangar for inspection.
The timing adds a layer of significance that did not exist during any of the previous 12 Starship flights. This is the first time SpaceX has attempted to launch Starship since the company made its stock market debut in June, listing under ticker SPCX at $135 per share. Public investors are now watching every Starship outcome in real time, and a last-second abort carries more visibility than it would have six months ago.
Flight 13 was designed to be one of the most consequential tests in the program’s history. It was set to carry 20 Starlink V3 satellites, the first operational payload Starship has ever attempted to deploy. Six of those satellites carried external cameras to photograph Starship’s heat shield from the outside during flight, which would act as a self-inspection approach SpaceX has never attempted before. The mission also needed to complete a Raptor engine relight in space, a step SpaceX skipped on Flight 12 in May after losing an engine during ascent. That Flight 12 booster also flipped 90 degrees off course during its boostback burn when five engines failed to reignite.
SpaceX has not announced an official next launch date. Musk’s “early next week” window points to July 21 or 22 at the earliest, pending the engine swap and a return to the pad.
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Electric vehicle maker Lucid Group has denied rumors of an imminent bankruptcy after a report from this morning sent the stock on a dramatic drop on Wall Street, seeing losses of more than 40 percent during trading hours.
Lucid’s Director of Communications, Nick Twork, responded to the report from Eletric-Vehicles.com, which stated the company’s restructuring advisor, AlixPartners, was asked to review two decisions: taking Lucid shares private or filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The report also claims AlixPartners told the Lucid board to “concentrate on Gravity production while improving its quality, and to temporarily hold back the Lucid Air, the sedan that has defined the company since its launch.”
Twork said:
$LCID The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is…
— Nick Twork (@ntwork) July 14, 2026
Shares rebounded after the response to the report, halving its losses as the trading day neared 3 p.m. Eastern.
Lucid has struggled to get its sales off the ground and into more respectable numbers, but the company is in its early years, when things are hard to begin with. It is also backed by several notable investors, including the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which has nearly limitless money and likely would not ditch an investment of this size so soon.
Lucid shares were down just 14 percent at the time of publication, a far cry from the 55 percent its losses topped out at during the day.
Ron DeSantis calls out media bias in Tesla crash coverage
Tesla enters two new markets on two different continents in one week
