News
Which style of Tesla’s Solar Roof tile is right for you?
With the explicit goal of making solar panels as appealing as electric cars have become, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has unveiled the company’s newest product: solar roof tiles manufactured with durable, long lasting tempered-glass. The slogan, “Power from above, beauty from the street” captured the product and theme of the unveiling, which took place at Universal Studios in Los Angeles with the sun ready to set in the background.
The new roofs will be a collaboration between SolarCity and Tesla and can be combined with Tesla’s Powerwall 2 home battery. The tiles are hydrographically printed. Musk explained that this process that makes each one a “special snowflake.”
Throughout the product unveiling, Musk emphasized that these solar tiles, which will be integrated into the roof and invisible when viewed from the street, offer a much more attractive option as compared with currently-used solar technology. The tiles will be soon available to the public in four distinct styles. Each is architecturally significant to a home’s core design. Four distinct tile styles reinforce the importance of connecting an architectural past to the Tesla vision of a sustainable future. The “beautiful, affordable, and seamlessly integrated” glass tiles have significant historic origins and contemporary appeal.
Tuscan Glass Tile
This roof, sometimes called Italian Renaissance style, is an element of a home integrated with its setting. Consistent with Musk’s vision of sustainable solutions to a “mine-and-burn” hydrocarbon economy, landscape architecture and gardens balance Tuscan house design. The roof structure is a combination of side gable, cross gable, combined hip and gable, or hipped configuration, often with projecting wings and deep roof overhangs and eaves. The style borrows details from the entire history of Spanish architecture, with architectural elements of paired French doors, classic arches, and some use of wrought iron.
Slate Glass Tile
The most desirable roofing material for more than 1,000 years, slate has been acclaimed for its elegance and unique character. It required a craft person’s expertise and skill in hand shaping and laying it on the roof. The Tesla version likely will resemble thin tiles split into uniform thicknesses. Slate’s aesthetic appearance is due to a wide variety of rich colors and textures that are combined in nearly endless combinations. Found on virtually every class of structure, slate roofs are perhaps most often associated with institutional, ecclesiastical, and government buildings, yet slate was often used on farm and agricultural buildings as well.
-
- Credit: Tesla
Textured Glass Tile
Textured roofing tiles were used in Neolithic China as early as 10.000 B.C. and 5000 years ago in Babylon. By the end of the nineteenth century, as the use of glazed roofing tiles grew, textured tiles became among the most ornamental and distinctive roofing materials. Now featured on many historic buildings, their aesthetic qualities include many shapes, colors, patterns, and textures. Architecturally, a field of textured tiles often covers the majority of a roof’s flat surface, with decorative tiles used along the peak of the roof. In more ornamental installations, the field of tiles may have areas of patterning created by tiles of different shapes, dimensions, or color variations ranging from deep browns to pale pinks to buff or beige. Their interesting appearance has often made textured tile roofs prominent stylistic features of historic structures.
-
- Credit: Tesla
Smooth Glass Tile
Flat smooth tile offers clean lines that compliment a contemporary design with unassuming, no-frills elegance. It contains a straightforward, stripped-down geometry and a means of securing an organic bond between old, existing architecture and new buildings. This is particularly important in optically sensitive areas where contemporary architecture accentuates an important visual impression. All parts of the resultant ensemble stem from a single smooth tile source, which appears as if it grew up over the centuries. Smooth glass tiles can contribute to an eclectic conglomeration of heritage-listed façades and modern stylistic elements. Optically robust, these tiles now provide an interplay of nuances that was once typical of hand-crafted products.
Tying Architecture and Aesthetics to Energy Power Solutions
The Tesla solar roof tiles offer high efficiency solar power which will produce energy even during high temperature days. Color louver film allows cells to blend into the roof while exposing them to the sun above. With tempered glass, the material is extremely impact resistant. The solar integrates with Tesla home batteries to collect energy during the day for use in the evening once the sun goes down. Musk tweeted that “solar glass tiles can also incorporate heating elements, like rear defroster on a car, to clear roof of snow and keep generating energy.”
Tesla expects to start installing the solar roofs next summer. More durable than normal roofing tiles, the solar roofs can be tied to the updated Powerwall 2 home battery (14 kWh, $5500) which the company also showcased at the unveiling event.
The announcement of this solar innovation implies that the Tesla/ SolarCity merger will receive upcoming shareholder votes and approval.
If you’re considering solar for your home or business, we encourage you to get a solar cost estimate first, based on your monthly utility bill and location. The service is being provided by an affiliate partner and fan to Teslarati.
Tesla rolled out Full Self-Driving version 14.2 yesterday to members of the Early Access Program (EAP). Expectations were high, and Tesla surely delivered.
With the rollout of Tesla FSD v14.2, there were major benchmarks for improvement from the v14.1 suite, which spanned across seven improvements. Our final experience with v14.1 was with v14.1.7, and to be honest, things were good, but it felt like there were a handful of regressions from previous iterations.
While there were improvements in brake stabbing and hesitation, we did experience a few small interventions related to navigation and just overall performance. It was nothing major; there were no critical takeovers that required any major publicity, as they were more or less subjective things that I was not particularly comfortable with. Other drivers might have been more relaxed.
With v14.2 hitting our cars yesterday, there were a handful of things we truly noticed in terms of improvement, most notably the lack of brake stabbing and hesitation, a major complaint with v14.1.x.
However, in a 62-minute drive that was fully recorded, there were a lot of positives, and only one true complaint, which was something we haven’t had issues with in the past.
The Good
Lack of Brake Stabbing and Hesitation
Perhaps the most notable and publicized issue with v14.1.x was the presence of brake stabbing and hesitation. Arriving at intersections was particularly nerve-racking on the previous version simply because of this. At four-way stops, the car would not be assertive enough to take its turn, especially when other vehicles at the same intersection would inch forward or start to move.
This was a major problem.
However, there were no instances of this yesterday on our lengthy drive. It was much more assertive when arriving at these types of scenarios, but was also more patient when FSD knew it was not the car’s turn to proceed.
Can report on v14.2 today there were ZERO instances of break stabbing or hesitation at intersections today
It was a significant improvement from v14.1.x
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) November 21, 2025
This improvement was the most noticeable throughout the drive, along with fixes in overall smoothness.
Speed Profiles Seem to Be More Reasonable
There were a handful of FSD v14 users who felt as if the loss of a Max Speed setting was a negative. However, these complaints will, in our opinion, begin to subside, especially as things have seemed to be refined quite nicely with v14.2.
Freeway driving is where this is especially noticeable. If it’s traveling too slow, just switch to a faster profile. If it’s too fast, switch to a slower profile. However, the speeds seem to be much more defined with each Speed Profile, which is something that I really find to be a huge advantage. Previously, you could tell the difference in speeds, but not in driving styles. At times, Standard felt a lot like Hurry. Now, you can clearly tell the difference between the two.
It seems as if Tesla made a goal that drivers should be able to tell which Speed Profile is active if it was not shown on the screen. With v14.1.x, this was not necessarily something that could be done. With v14.2, if someone tested me on which Speed Profile was being used, I’m fairly certain I could pick each one.
Better Overall Operation
I felt, at times, especially with v14.1.7, there were some jerky movements. Nothing that was super alarming, but there were times when things just felt a little more finicky than others.
v14.2 feels much smoother overall, with really great decision-making, lane changes that feel second nature, and a great speed of travel. It was a very comfortable ride.
The Bad
Parking
It feels as if there was a slight regression in parking quality, as both times v14.2 pulled into parking spots, I would have felt compelled to adjust manually if I were staying at my destinations. For the sake of testing, at my first destination, I arrived, allowed the car to park, and then left. At the tail-end of testing, I walked inside the store that FSD v14.2 drove me to, so I had to adjust the parking manually.
This was pretty disappointing. Apart from parking at Superchargers, which is always flawless, parking performance is something that needs some attention. The release notes for v14.2. state that parking spot selection and parking quality will improve with future versions.
Any issues with parking on your end? 14.1.7 didn’t have this trouble with parking pic.twitter.com/JPLRO2obUj
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) November 21, 2025
However, this was truly my only complaint about v14.2.
You can check out our full 62-minute ride-along below:
Elon Musk
SpaceX issues statement on Starship V3 Booster 18 anomaly
The incident unfolded during gas-system pressure testing at the company’s Massey facility in Starbase, Texas.
SpaceX has issued an initial statement about Starship Booster 18’s anomaly early Friday. The incident unfolded during gas-system pressure testing at the company’s Massey facility in Starbase, Texas.
SpaceX’s initial comment
As per SpaceX in a post on its official account on social media platform X, Booster 18 was undergoing gas system pressure tests when the anomaly happened. Despite the nature of the incident, the company emphasized that no propellant was loaded, no engines were installed, and personnel were kept at a safe distance from the booster, resulting in zero injuries.
“Booster 18 suffered an anomaly during gas system pressure testing that we were conducting in advance of structural proof testing. No propellant was on the vehicle, and engines were not yet installed. The teams need time to investigate before we are confident of the cause. No one was injured as we maintain a safe distance for personnel during this type of testing. The site remains clear and we are working plans to safely reenter the site,” SpaceX wrote in its post on X.
Incident and aftermath
Livestream footage from LabPadre showed Booster 18’s lower half crumpling around the liquid oxygen tank area at approximately 4:04 a.m. CT. Subsequent images posted by on-site observers revealed extensive deformation across the booster’s lower structure. Needless to say, spaceflight observers have noted that Booster 18 would likely be a complete loss due to its anomaly.
Booster 18 had rolled out only a day earlier and was one of the first vehicles in the Starship V3 program. The V3 series incorporates structural reinforcements and reliability upgrades intended to prepare Starship for rapid-reuse testing and eventual tower-catch operations. Elon Musk has been optimistic about Starship V3, previously noting on X that the spacecraft might be able to complete initial missions to Mars.
Investor's Corner
Tesla analyst maintains $500 PT, says FSD drives better than humans now
The team also met with Tesla leaders for more than an hour to discuss autonomy, chip development, and upcoming deployment plans.
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) received fresh support from Piper Sandler this week after analysts toured the Fremont Factory and tested the company’s latest Full Self-Driving software. The firm reaffirmed its $500 price target, stating that FSD V14 delivered a notably smooth robotaxi demonstration and may already perform at levels comparable to, if not better than, average human drivers.
The team also met with Tesla leaders for more than an hour to discuss autonomy, chip development, and upcoming deployment plans.
Analysts highlight autonomy progress
During more than 75 minutes of focused discussions, analysts reportedly focused on FSD v14’s updates. Piper Sandler’s team pointed to meaningful strides in perception, object handling, and overall ride smoothness during the robotaxi demo.
The visit also included discussions on updates to Tesla’s in-house chip initiatives, its Optimus program, and the growth of the company’s battery storage business. Analysts noted that Tesla continues refining cost structures and capital expenditure expectations, which are key elements in future margin recovery, as noted in a Yahoo Finance report.
Analyst Alexander Potter noted that “we think FSD is a truly impressive product that is (probably) already better at driving than the average American.” This conclusion was strengthened by what he described as a “flawless robotaxi ride to the hotel.”
Street targets diverge on TSLA
While Piper Sandler stands by its $500 target, it is not the highest estimate on the Street. Wedbush, for one, has a $600 per share price target for TSLA stock.
Other institutions have also weighed in on TSLA stock as of late. HSBC reiterated a Reduce rating with a $131 target, citing a gap between earnings fundamentals and the company’s market value. By contrast, TD Cowen maintained a Buy rating and a $509 target, pointing to strong autonomous driving demonstrations in Austin and the pace of software-driven improvements.
Stifel analysts also lifted their price target for Tesla to $508 per share over the company’s ongoing robotaxi and FSD programs.
Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.2 – Full Review, the Good and the Bad
SpaceX issues statement on Starship V3 Booster 18 anomaly
