Investor's Corner
Tesla (TSLA) S&P inclusion makes a believer out of a notorious skeptic
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) is headed for the S&P 500, and it’s making believers out of notorious skeptic Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley, who has remained bearish on the automaker for over two years. Jonas has held Sell or Hold ratings on TSLA shares since October 2018, and for the first time since then, he is recommending that investors buy stock in the electric automaker.
“Tesla is on the verge of a profound model shift from selling cars (volume x price) to generating high margin, recurring software and services revenue (platform users x ARPU),” Jonas wrote in a note to investors. “The car business is the entry ticket to unlocking much larger TAMs. We see ~22% upside to PT, ~$142 upside to bull case.”
Jonas and Morgan Stanley upgraded the rating on TSLA stock from Equal-weight to Overweight and revised the price target from $360 to $540. At the time of writing, TSLA shares were trading at $444.96.
* Morgan Stanley Upgrades Tesla to Overweight, Raises PT to $540$TSLA
— David Tayar (@davidtayar5) November 18, 2020
Morgan Stanley and Jonas have shared a relatively bearish outlook on TSLA stock for over two years. Questioning the company’s value in the automotive market, Jonas has never seen Tesla as the dominating entity that it is, especially in the EV sector. Instead, the firm and the analyst alike have recommended that investors stay away from TSLA, expecting a slowing in momentum after strong spikes in stock price. Only recently have TSLA shares remained relatively consistent in price. That is, up until the S&P 500 announced that the automaker would be joining the index in late December, which sent the stock surging up 13% in after-hours trading on Monday evening.
However, the company’s five consecutive profitable quarters, along with sustained growth in production and delivery figures, except Q2 2020, which was slowed by the COVID-19 pandemic, has finally convinced Jonas to take a bullish outlook on TSLA.
Admitting that an early-year report, which analyzed Tesla’s sensitivity in varying scenarios, was not as in-depth as the firm would have liked, Morgan Stanley revisited TSLA in a more recent study. “Since that time, we have had the opportunity to conduct more proprietary research on this topic, tapping into Morgan Stanley’s leading technology equity research team. At the same time, Tesla has continued to develop its services/platform business to a level where we feel that is appropriate for investors to consider to change how they model the company’s revenue and profit streams.”
The firm added that Tesla Energy and Tesla Insurance were both factored into the base case for the first time with the newly-revised price target and rating.
More revisions could come after the company discloses its end-of-year numbers.
“Tesla is currently generating highly profitable cash flow generating service revenue — this business exists today,” he writes. “Due to the growth of service revenue, improved capability (which may trigger step changes in the recognition of deferred revenue) and earnings materiality, we believe it is only a matter of time before investors are provided with far greater levels of disclosure that can trigger a further re-rating of the equity.”
Jonas’ and Morgan Stanley’s backtrack on TSLA stock shows that believers are made out of skeptics. Before too long, analysts who remain bearish on the company’s stock will likely have to retrace their steps and revise their outlooks as Jonas did here.
Disclaimer: Joey Klender is a TSLA Shareholder.
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 aborted at Zero and Musk just told us what broke
Four Raptor engines failed to ignite at T-zero, forcing SpaceX to scrub Starship Flight 13 Thursday.
SpaceX scrubbed the Starship Flight 13 launch attempt Thursday evening at the last possible moment, after four of the Super Heavy booster’s 33 Raptor 3 engines failed to ignite during the startup sequence. The 90-minute window had opened at 6:45 p.m. EDT from Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, and the countdown had proceeded without issue all day, with more than 11.5 million pounds of liquid methane and liquid oxygen being fully loaded into the rocket before the automated abort triggered. SpaceX’s launch directors posted on X, “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt,” and shut down the livestream shortly after.
Musk confirmed the root cause within hours. “Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort,” he wrote on X. “To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed and replaced. Most probable launch timing is early next week.” SpaceX engineers began draining propellant tanks immediately and Booster 20 was rolled back to its hangar for inspection.
The timing adds a layer of significance that did not exist during any of the previous 12 Starship flights. This is the first time SpaceX has attempted to launch Starship since the company made its stock market debut in June, listing under ticker SPCX at $135 per share. Public investors are now watching every Starship outcome in real time, and a last-second abort carries more visibility than it would have six months ago.
Flight 13 was designed to be one of the most consequential tests in the program’s history. It was set to carry 20 Starlink V3 satellites, the first operational payload Starship has ever attempted to deploy. Six of those satellites carried external cameras to photograph Starship’s heat shield from the outside during flight, which would act as a self-inspection approach SpaceX has never attempted before. The mission also needed to complete a Raptor engine relight in space, a step SpaceX skipped on Flight 12 in May after losing an engine during ascent. That Flight 12 booster also flipped 90 degrees off course during its boostback burn when five engines failed to reignite.
SpaceX has not announced an official next launch date. Musk’s “early next week” window points to July 21 or 22 at the earliest, pending the engine swap and a return to the pad.
Investor's Corner
Lucid CEO dispels any rumors of bankruptcy: ‘So far from the facts’
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Investor's Corner
Lucid denies rumors of bankruptcy after over 40% stock drop
Electric vehicle maker Lucid Group has denied rumors of an imminent bankruptcy after a report from this morning sent the stock on a dramatic drop on Wall Street, seeing losses of more than 40 percent during trading hours.
Lucid’s Director of Communications, Nick Twork, responded to the report from Eletric-Vehicles.com, which stated the company’s restructuring advisor, AlixPartners, was asked to review two decisions: taking Lucid shares private or filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The report also claims AlixPartners told the Lucid board to “concentrate on Gravity production while improving its quality, and to temporarily hold back the Lucid Air, the sedan that has defined the company since its launch.”
Twork said:
$LCID The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is…
— Nick Twork (@ntwork) July 14, 2026
Shares rebounded after the response to the report, halving its losses as the trading day neared 3 p.m. Eastern.
Lucid has struggled to get its sales off the ground and into more respectable numbers, but the company is in its early years, when things are hard to begin with. It is also backed by several notable investors, including the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which has nearly limitless money and likely would not ditch an investment of this size so soon.
Lucid shares were down just 14 percent at the time of publication, a far cry from the 55 percent its losses topped out at during the day.