News
Tesla to Debut Battery Swapping Stations
Tesla will set up automated stations later this year that the electric-car company says can remove a spent battery pack and install a fresh one in less than two minutes.
On a stage Thursday night surrounded by Tesla investors and enthusiasts, CEO Elon Musk showed the robotic system in action on two Model S cars while a camera crew simultaneously filmed a driver filling up an Audi A8 at a gas station. The Audi, which required about 23 gallons of fuel, took roughly four minutes to refuel, or a minute more than the time required to swap the batteries on the two Model S sedans.
While it was hardly a scientific experiment, Musk said it would take 90 seconds from start to finish, and the process – which uses equipment similar to that used at the company’s Fremont, Calif., factory – was barely noticeable aside from watching the car’s suspension rise and fall from the battery’s weight.
Once the driver parked the car over a trap door, automated controls unbolted the battery from the undercarriage, slipped it below the stage floor and bolted in a new battery, all without the driver having to exit the vehicle.
The idea behind the swaps, Tesla said, was to “give people a second choice” to recharge.
“Now they can charge for free or do a battery swap for a cost,” Tesla spokeswoman Alexis Georgeson told MSN Autos.
Drivers will pay between $60 and $80 for a battery swap, or whatever the local equivalent is for 15 gallons of premium gasoline, the company said. Tesla will let Model S owners swap as many times as they want, although it will require them to pay the difference in warranty and age should they swap into a newer battery.
Tesla did not reveal details, but told MSN Autos it would charge drivers a set amount per kilowatt-hour if they decide to keep the battery indefinitely, depending on how much capacity their original battery has lost. Eventually, when the system is filled with used batteries, owners may be able to receive credits if they use an older pack.
Tesla already has eight Supercharger fast-charging stations that allow Model S owners to recharge their battery pack by up to 80 percent in about 30 minutes, at no cost. The new battery-swap stations will be added to existing fast-charge stations, starting in California later this year along Interstate 5 from San Francisco to Los Angeles, and later along the Boston to Washington, D.C., corridor, Tesla said. No attendants will be required, and the entire system – save for some storage for the 50 new battery packs the company plans to have at each station – will be done underground. No reservations will be needed.
Battery swapping has long been a hot idea in the electric-car industry, although no company has been successful with it. The Israeli company Better Place was one of the first to install large-scale battery-swapping stations, but it went bankrupt last month. Fisker Automotive, another failed company that used to sell the Karma plug-in hybrid, had designed its battery packs to be “hot swappable” in less than 30 minutes, but it is in bankruptcy court searching for a potential buyer.
Europeans have adopted a simpler alternative whereby an electric car’s batteries are leased from the automaker and replaced for a reduced cost at the owner’s discretion. Smart, Renault and Nissan have offered such programs, which lowers the car’s sticker price dramatically but requires the owner to enter a multiyear contract.
Earlier Friday, Nissan said it would offer a battery leasing program for all U.S. Leaf owners by mid-2014 for $100 per month and would, per its warranty, replace the battery if the capacity drops below 70 percent over five years or 60,000 miles.
[Source: MSN Autos]
Tesla CEO Elon Musk revealed today on the social media platform X that legacy automakers, such as Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis, do not want to license the company’s Full Self-Driving suite, at least not without a long list of their own terms.
“I’ve tried to warn them and even offered to license Tesla FSD, but they don’t want it! Crazy,” Musk said on X. “When legacy auto does occasionally reach out, they tepidly discuss implementing FSD for a tiny program in 5 years with unworkable requirements for Tesla, so pointless.”
I’ve tried to warn them and even offered to license Tesla FSD, but they don’t want it! Crazy …
When legacy auto does occasionally reach out, they tepidly discuss implementing FSD for a tiny program in 5 years with unworkable requirements for Tesla, so pointless. 🤷♂️
🦕 🦕
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 24, 2025
Musk made the remark in response to a note we wrote about earlier today from Melius Research, in which analyst Rob Wertheimer said, “Our point is not that Tesla is at risk, it’s that everybody else is,” in terms of autonomy and self-driving development.
Wertheimer believes there are hundreds of billions of dollars in value headed toward Tesla’s way because of its prowess with FSD.
A few years ago, Musk first remarked that Tesla was in early talks with one legacy automaker regarding licensing Full Self-Driving for its vehicles. Tesla never confirmed which company it was, but given Musk’s ongoing talks with Ford CEO Jim Farley at the time, it seemed the Detroit-based automaker was the likely suspect.
Tesla’s Elon Musk reiterates FSD licensing offer for other automakers
Ford has been perhaps the most aggressive legacy automaker in terms of its EV efforts, but it recently scaled back its electric offensive due to profitability issues and weak demand. It simply was not making enough vehicles, nor selling the volume needed to turn a profit.
Musk truly believes that many of the companies that turn their backs on FSD now will suffer in the future, especially considering the increased chance it could be a parallel to what has happened with EV efforts for many of these companies.
Unfortunately, they got started too late and are now playing catch-up with Tesla, XPeng, BYD, and the other dominating forces in EVs across the globe.
Tesla is backtracking on a strange adjustment it made to its in-car Navigation feature after numerous complaints from owners convinced the company to make a change.
Tesla’s in-car Navigation is catered to its vehicles, as it routes Supercharging stops and preps your vehicle for charging with preconditioning. It is also very intuitive, and features other things like weather radar and a detailed map outlining points of interest.
However, a recent change to the Navigation by Tesla did not go unnoticed, and owners were really upset about it.
For trips that required multiple Supercharger stops, Tesla decided to implement a naming change, which did not show the city or state of each charging stop. Instead, it just showed the business where the Supercharger was located, giving many owners an unwelcome surprise.
However, Tesla’s Director of Supercharging, Max de Zegher, admitted the update was a “big mistake on our end,” and made a change that rolled out within 24 hours:
The naming change should have happened at once, instead of in 2 sequential steps. That was a big miss on our end. We do listen to the community and we do course-correct fast. The accelerated fix rolled out last night. The Tesla App is updated and most in-car touchscreens should…
— Max (@MdeZegher) November 20, 2025
The lack of a name for the city where a Supercharging stop would be made caused some confusion for owners in the short term. Some drivers argued that it was more difficult to make stops at some familiar locations that were special to them. Others were not too keen on not knowing where they were going to be along their trip.
Tesla was quick to scramble to resolve this issue, and it did a great job of rolling it out in an expedited manner, as de Zegher said that most in-car touch screens would notice the fix within one day of the change being rolled out.
Additionally, there will be even more improvements in December, as Tesla plans to show the common name/amenity below the site name as well, which will give people a better idea of what to expect when they arrive at a Supercharger.
News
Dutch regulator RDW confirms Tesla FSD February 2026 target
The regulator emphasized that safety, not public pressure, will decide whether FSD receives authorization for use in Europe.
The Dutch vehicle authority RDW responded to Tesla’s recent updates about its efforts to bring Full Self-Driving (Supervised) in Europe, confirming that February 2026 remains the target month for Tesla to demonstrate regulatory compliance.
While acknowledging the tentative schedule with Tesla, the regulator emphasized that safety, not public pressure, will decide whether FSD receives authorization for use in Europe.
RDW confirms 2026 target, warns Feb 2026 timeline is not guaranteed
In its response, which was posted on its official website, the RDW clarified that it does not disclose details about ongoing manufacturer applications due to competitive sensitivity. However, the agency confirmed that both parties have agreed on a February 2026 window during which Tesla is expected to show that FSD (Supervised) can meet required safety and compliance standards. Whether Tesla can satisfy those conditions within the timeline “remains to be seen,” RDW added.
RDW also directly addressed Tesla’s social media request encouraging drivers to contact the regulator to express support. While thanking those who already reached out, RDW asked the public to stop contacting them, noting these messages burden customer-service resources and have no influence on the approval process.
“In the message on X, Tesla calls on Tesla drivers to thank the RDW and to express their enthusiasm about this planning to us by contacting us. We thank everyone who has already done so, and would like to ask everyone not to contact us about this. It takes up unnecessary time for our customer service. Moreover, this will have no influence on whether or not the planning is met,” the RDW wrote.
The RDW shares insights on EU approval requirements
The RDW further outlined how new technology enters the European market when no existing legislation directly covers it. Under EU Regulation 2018/858, a manufacturer may seek an exemption for unregulated features such as advanced driver assistance systems. The process requires a Member State, in this case the Netherlands, to submit a formal request to the European Commission on the manufacturer’s behalf.
Approval then moves to a committee vote. A majority in favor would grant EU-wide authorization, allowing the technology across all Member States. If the vote fails, the exemption is valid only within the Netherlands, and individual countries must decide whether to accept it independently.
Before any exemption request can be filed, Tesla must complete a comprehensive type-approval process with the RDW, including controlled on-road testing. Provided that FSD Supervised passes these regulatory evaluations, the exemption could be submitted for broader EU consideration.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk sends rivals dire warning about Full Self-Driving
Tesla backtracks on strange Nav feature after numerous complaints
