News
Trump adds pro-SpaceX commercial space advocate to NASA transition team
After pulling over billionaire PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel to his overall White House transition team, President-elect Donald Trump has made another Elon-Musk-connected team addition, this time to his NASA transition team. The addition of Dr. Greg Autry comes as good news for SpaceX and commercial space fans overall.
Dr. Autry, an Assistant Professor of Clinical Entrepreneurship at the University of Southern California, focuses his research on innovation policy and government impact on entrepreneurism, with “new space” as a particular area of interest since 2003. He currently sits on the editorial board of the New Space Journal and, along with having published in several major news outlets, was the lead author on a report for the FAA Offices of Commercial Space Transportation analyzing the competitive advantage of the United States in the human spaceflight market.
In early September, Dr. Autry published an op-ed on SpaceNews.com advocating for the future of private space exploration despite the recent SpaceX launch pad anomaly. In the piece, he defended SpaceX’s 93% launch success rate compared to NASA’s 91% overall, and encouraged continuing support of the developments being made in commercial space programs using history as a guide for the potential advancements.
Further in favor of SpaceX, Dr. Autry outlined his policy recommendations for the incoming presidential administration in his mid-October Forbes article. In the piece, he advocated for the complete defunding of NASA’s Space Launch System, citing the high budget allotment for the program which has failed to keep up with the commercial space company technologies of SpaceX and Blue Origin.
Other team members added for Trump’s NASA transition are Steve Cook of Dynetics, a corporate vice president heavily involved in the AR-1 engine to replace the current Russian-made RD-180 being used by United Launch Alliance, and Jack Burns, a major advocate for lunar-based missions.
As is the case with other government departments, NASA will be making top level administration changes during the presidential administration transition, something that will have major impacts on the direction the agency will take in the coming years.
For historical context, NASA underwent a major change in direction under President Obama when the moon-focused Constellation program was canceled and the space shuttle was retired, temporarily handing human trips to the International Space Station over to the Russians via purchased rocket seats. The idea was for money to be invested into NASA’s commercial space program, thus majorly benefiting companies like SpaceX, but the plan was rerouted in Congress, and the birth of the Space Launch System came from political maneuvering over economic concerns. The SLS mission has now been directed towards deep space exploration and included as part of NASA’s “Journey to Mars”.
It’s almost anyone’s guess where things will head policy-wise under President Trump, but the direction seems to be circling three goals: the restoration of U.S. leadership in human spaceflight, a focus on deep space exploration over Earth-focused missions, and breaking down barriers hindering commercial space programs. While there are varying voices included on Trump’s transition team, having a strong advocate for the benefits of commercial space flight is welcome news.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
