Investor's Corner
How will Tesla perform in Mr. Trump’s America?
To say the results of the 2016 election were surprising is a gross understatement. That’s like saying the the national debt is rather a lot of money. What will a Trump presidency mean to Elon Musk and Tesla Motors? The answer is, it’s too early to tell. But we can make some (hopefully) educated guesses.
First and foremost, Trump is a champion of American companies providing jobs for Americans. Tesla has taken an abandoned factory in Fremont, California and turned it into one of the premier automobile manufacturing facilities in the world. And that’s just for openers.
Tesla has just announced it has acquired Grohmann Engineering, a highly respected German engineering firm located in in the city of Prüm near the border with Belgium and Luxembourg. With help from Grohmann, Musk wants to show the world how to increase production by a factor of ten by ‘building the machine that builds the machine’. That translates into higher productivity, something any businessman can understand.
Musk is committed to building a sustainable future while President-elect Trump is committed to a “Drill, baby, drill” mentality. Green Tech Media weighs in with the opinion that Trump will simply ignore the Paris climate accord and dismantle Obama’s Clean Power Plan. He undoubtedly will rein in the power of the EPA. What effect will that have on CAFE rules? We simply don’t know but no one should be surprised if vehicle efficiency targets for car companies become considerably watered down over the next few years.
Musk has always challenged the other car companies to build “compelling electric cars” but few have accepted the challenge. Most give the appearance of being dragged kicking and screaming into the zero emissions future while they continue to build every large truck and SUV they can weld, bolt, and screw together. One thing seems clear. Incentives for electric vehicles and for building a national EV charging infrastructure will likely be reduced in a Trump administration or eliminated all together.
That would not seem to be a major issue for Tesla Motors, whose current customers are mostly able to afford the products Tesla makes with or without incentives. But it could be an issue for at least some of the 373,000 Model 3 reservation holders. It is more likely that SolarCity’s rooftop solar business will be negatively impacted by a Trump administration. The President-elect has said publicly he doesn’t believe government should pick winners and losers in the commercial world. Utility companies may find it easier to resist encroachment on their business model from rooftop solar with Trump at the helm.
Elon told CNBC News on November 4 that he had hoped Donald Trump would not get the nomination and that Hillary Clinton’s climate policies were more in tune with his own preferences. He went on to say he now felt a bit stronger that Trump was “not the right guy, he just doesn’t seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States.”
Will Musk and Trump be able to do business? Trump has to be a big supporter of American business but for Musk, the idea of his zero emissions cars with electricity derived from burning more coal and more natural gas extracted from our national parks and public lands has to be a bitter pill to swallow.
For the moment, America has said it doesn’t give a damn about sustainability, even though 60% of people tell the pollsters that building a green economy is high on their wish list. For now, “cognitive dissonance” is the order of the day. The people have spoken and their message is they want good jobs and lots of them sooner rather than later. A lot of people have taken Donald Trump at his word that he can provide them.
It is doubtful that Trumps’ victory will impact the fate of Tesla Motors or SolarCity negatively. Tesla has too much momentum built up and solar power is poised to supplant fossil fuels and nuclear simply because it costs less. Solar won’t need incentives if it is cheaper than the alternatives. Now electric cars will need to get less expensive to appeal to mainstream buyers.
Elon Musk
Tesla Cybercabs narrowly miss deadly Amazon cargo plane crash
An Amazon cargo plane crash near Miami’s airport stopped feet from dozens of Tesla Cybercabs.
An Amazon Prime Air Boeing 767 cargo jet overran the runway at Miami International Airport on Sunday afternoon, killing five people and injuring five more. The jet, operated by North Carolina based carrier 21 Air as Flight 7598, touched down around 2 p.m. after arriving from San Juan, Puerto Rico, then crossed the airport perimeter, plowed across NW 67th Avenue and struck multiple vehicles before catching fire, according to the Associated Press.
Photos and video from the scene show the aircraft’s nose stopped within meters of a fenced staging lot holding dozens of gold painted Tesla Cybercabs, the steering wheel free robotaxi Tesla began putting on public roads in Austin last week. Miami-Dade Fire Rescue has confirmed the plane struck “multiple vehicles” but has not said whether any Cybercabs were among them, and neither Tesla nor airport officials have addressed the fleet directly.
The Cybercabs had not yet entered commercial service in Miami. Tesla’s existing Robotaxi operation there runs on modified Model Y vehicles and has been unsupervised since Ashok Elluswamy confirmed the detail on X in July.
Footage of the plane crash from earlier today | #ONLYinDADE pic.twitter.com/iGoOtnd6cD
— ONLY in DADE (@ONLYinDADE) September 6, 2026
Elon Musk offered the briefest of reactions. Replying to a Zero Hedge post about the Cybercabs sitting so close to the wreckage, he wrote a single word: “Weird.” He has not commented further, and Tesla has not issued a statement.
The timing puts Tesla’s newest vehicle near an unrelated but highly visible tragedy just days after its Austin debut, a launch that had already drawn scrutiny from federal regulators. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an audit how Tesla certified the Cybercab as compliant with federal vehicle safety standards, a process Teslarati covered after the vehicle’s September 3 launch event. That inquiry concerns the car’s lack of a steering wheel and pedals, not the Miami crash.
Investigators from the FAA and NTSB are focused on the plane, not the parking lot beside it. Flight data reviewed by outlets including Simple Flying show the 767 touched down around 170 knots, well above the 135 to 140 knot range typical for the aircraft, though investigators have not determined a cause. Amazon said it is working with authorities and that its priority is the safety of everyone affected.
Whether any Cybercabs were damaged, and what Tesla plans for the fleet parked near one of the country’s busiest airports, remain open questions.
Featured
Tesla Cybercab is coming to Asia this month as US service officially begins
Tesla Asia says Cybercab will be on display in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing and Shanghai this month.
Tesla’s Cybercab is heading to Asia. The official Tesla Asia account posted on X Thursday, inviting Cybercab fans to “Come experience the future of autonomy in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing & Shanghai.” The post went up within hours of Tesla’s own Cybercab milestone in Texas, where the company said Thursday it had begun offering rides in across Austin.
Exact dates and venues for the Asia tour haven’t been released yet, though Tesla Hong Kong replied to the announcement with “Cybercab will be on display in Hong Kong soon,” while Tesla Japan’s response pointed fans to a sign up page for updates. Neither post mentions test rides or a service area, and nothing so far suggests Tesla is launching Robotaxi operations in any of the four cities. Based on how Tesla has run past Cybercab tours, in Europe in late 2024 and at US shopping centers that same December, the Asia stops are almost certainly static displays at Tesla stores or public venues as a means to stimulate buzz for its future driverless ride-hailing service in the big cities.
Cybercab will be on display in Asia this month!
Come experience the future of autonomy in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing & Shanghai. pic.twitter.com/wGmmEastfX— Tesla Asia (@Tesla_Asia) September 4, 2026
The timing lines up with Tesla’s only prior Cybercab appearance in the region, a booth at the China International Import Expo in Shanghai last November, which Teslarati covered at the time. At that event, Tesla’s regional general manager for Shanghai framed the car as evidence of the company’s broader mission, a message Tesla has since formalized in its Master Plan Part IV, which states that “autonomous vehicles have the capacity to dramatically improve the affordability, availability and safety of transportation while reducing pollution, particularly in our increasingly dense global cities.” The same document is where Tesla lays out its “sustainable abundance” framing for Cybercab and Optimus alike, describing the two as the hardware behind an AI driven push to cut the cost of transportation and labor at scale.
Whether Cybercab actually operates as a robotaxi anywhere in Asia remains an open question, considering China has already pushed an autonomous ride-hailing market that’s run on homegrown players like Baidu’s Apollo Go and Pony AI. For now, the four city tour reads as a marketing push timed to Austin’s momentum.
Elon Musk
OpenAI cites distrust of SpaceX in decision to drop Cursor partnership
OpenAI will cut SpaceX-owned Cursor’s model access in November, citing Musk’s history of broken contracts.
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, announced late Friday that it is ending its partnership with Cursor, cutting off the coding tool’s access to its models on November 12. The move comes two weeks after SpaceX completed its $60 billion acquisition of Cursor’s parent company, Anysphere, folding the popular AI coding assistant into Elon Musk’s growing SpaceXAI division.
In a post on its website, OpenAI said the decision came down to trust, not technology. “We cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk’s companies violating contracts,” the company wrote. OpenAI pointed to two specific incidents: X, now part of SpaceX, allegedly breaking the terms of an existing OpenAI contract after Musk bought Twitter.
That lawsuit is the backdrop for all of this. Musk cofounded OpenAI in 2015, left the board in 2018, and sued Sam Altman and Greg Brockman in 2024, arguing they abandoned the company’s nonprofit mission for profit. A federal jury sided with OpenAI in May, finding Musk waited too long to sue rather than ruling on the merits of his claims. Musk said at the time he would appeal to the Ninth Circuit, calling the outcome a “calendar technicality” rather than a real judgment.
SpaceX’s interest in Cursor predates that verdict by weeks. The company first struck a deal with Cursor in April, securing an option to acquire it for $60 billion or pay $10 billion for joint development work instead. As Teslarati reported at the time, the logic was straightforward: Cursor was paying retail prices to Anthropic and OpenAI, two of its most direct competitors, every time a developer used its product, while SpaceX had idle capacity on its Colossus supercomputer, roughly the equivalent of a million Nvidia H100 GPUs, that Cursor could use to train its own models instead. SpaceX exercised the option in June, days after its own IPO, and the deal closed in mid-August.
Once it closed, Musk moved fast. On an all-hands call with more than 1,000 Cursor employees, he reportedly told staff that SpaceXAI’s Grok was playing catchup in the AI race, unlike Tesla and SpaceX in their own markets, and singled out Anthropic as the company to catch. Cursor CEO Michael Truell now reports directly to Musk inside SpaceXAI.
Losing OpenAI’s models leaves Cursor leaning harder on Anthropic’s Claude, which has its own compute agreement with SpaceX, and on Cursor’s in-house Composer model, the one SpaceX’s compute was supposed to accelerate in the first place. OpenAI framed the November deadline as maximum notice under its contract, and said it wants to “go above and beyond” to help developers through the transition. Whether Anthropic makes the same call is now the open question in AI coding.