California solar panel owners who make money by selling excess electricity back to the grid have their biggest incentive in jeopardy. The state’s largest power utilities have asked California officials to reduce the amount of money homeowners can make by contributing electricity to the grid. If officials comply with utility companies’ requests, the widespread adoption of solar could be hindered, a risk that some California lawmakers may not be ready to take.
California stands as the United States’ largest market for rooftop solar panels. The widespread adoption has been fueled by a favorable climate and environmentally-friendly incentives that encourage residents to go green. Because of the state’s success with convincing residents to switch to solar, other territories within the U.S. have used California’s policies as a template for their own fights against the use of fossil fuels that drive climate change.
This week, the California Public Utilities Commission is hosting utility companies, solar representatives, ratepayer advocates, and others, who are presenting their ideas on potential policy reforms, Reuters said. Policies will be effective in the coming years if passed.
Proposals presented over the past several days have focused on net metering, a policy that allows homeowners to profit off of the excess energy that is produced from solar panels that are equipped on their homes. When solar panels capture the sun’s energy, not all of it is always used. This excess energy is then given back to the grid. It can help power other homes in the event of energy shortages, which is a common occurrence in California due to the massive population. In the state last year, heatwaves caused blackouts in some areas due to the lack of available energy in the grid.
ALSO READ:
Net metering has been a selling point for some solar installation companies like Tesla and Sunrun, but small, local firms also benefit. This has caused California’s three investor-owned utility companies, Pacific Gas & Electric, San Diego Gas & Electric, and Southern California Edison, to recommend monthly charges of between $49 and $79 for solar owners for a 5-kilowatt system while compensating them for excess power, but the payout would be less.
Solar representatives are not keen on the idea because the incentives drive solar adoption. Executive Director of the California Solar & Storage Association Bernadette Del Chiaro believes that taking away the incentives could be detrimental to the environment.
“If we really put the brakes on rooftop solar today… we’re going to be in a world of hurt in 10 years when you wake up and realize ‘We actually do need to build (more solar panels),’” Del Chiaro said in an interview.
Net metering could be gradually reduced as solar trade groups are proposing a scheduled reduction over the next five years. By 2027, the rates would range between 25% and 50% lower than what they are currently, depending on the utility company that is used.
Energy
Tesla Megapacks powers the xAI Colossus supercomputer
Tesla Megapacks step in to stabilize xAI’s Colossus supercomputer, replacing natural gas turbines. Musk’s ventures keep intertwining.
Tesla Megapack batteries will power the xAI Colossus supercomputer in Memphis to ensure power stability. The collaboration between Tesla and xAI highlights the synergy among Elon Musk’s ventures.
The artificial intelligence startup has integrated Tesla Megapacks to manage outages and demand surges, bolstering the facility’s reliability. The Greater Memphis Chamber announced that Colossus, recently connected to a new 150-megawatt electric substation, is completing its first construction phase. This transition addresses criticism from environmental justice groups over the initial use of natural gas turbines.
“The temporary natural gas turbines that were being used to power the Phase I GPUs prior to grid connection are now being demobilized and will be removed from the site over the next two months.
“About half of the operating turbines will remain operating to power Phase II GPUs of xAI until a second substation (#22) already in construction is completed and connected to the electric grid, which is planned for the Fall of 2025, at which time the remaining turbines will be relegated to a backup power role,” the Chamber stated.
xAI’s rapid development of Colossus reflects its ambition to advance AI capabilities, but the project has faced scrutiny for environmental impacts. The shift to Megapacks and grid power aims to mitigate these concerns while ensuring operational continuity.
The Megapack deployment underscores the collaboration among Musk’s companies, including Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company. Tesla appears to be the common link between all of Musk’s companies. For example, The Boring Company built a tunnel in Giga, Texas. In addition, Musk has hinted at a potential collaboration between the Tesla Optimus Bot and Neuralink. And from January 2024 to February 2025, xAI invested $230 million in Megapacks, per a Tesla filing.
Tesla Energy reported a 156% year-over-year increase in Q1 2025, deploying 10.4 GWh of storage products, including Megapacks and Powerwalls. Tesla’s plans for a new Megapack factory in Waller County, Texas, which is expected to create 1,500 jobs in the area, further signal its commitment to scaling energy solutions.
As xAI leverages Tesla’s Megapacks to power Colossus, the integration showcases Musk’s interconnected business ecosystem. The supercomputer’s enhanced stability positions xAI to drive AI innovation, while Tesla’s energy solutions gain prominence, setting the stage for broader technological and economic impacts.
Energy
Tesla Energy celebrates one decade of sustainability
Tesla Energy has gone far since its early days, and it is now becoming a progressively bigger part of the company.
Tesla Energy recently celebrated its 10th anniversary with a dedicated video showcasing several of its milestones over the past decade.
Tesla Energy has gone far since its early days, and it is now becoming a progressively bigger part of the company.
Tesla Energy Early Days
When Elon Musk launched Tesla Energy in 2015, he noted that the business is a fundamental transformation of how the world works. To start, Tesla Energy offered the Powerwall, a 7 kWh/10 kWh home battery system, and the Powerpack, a grid-capable 100 kWh battery block that is designed for scalability. A few days after the products’ launch, Musk noted that Tesla had received 38,000 reservations for the Powerwall and 2,500 reservations for the Powerpack.
Tesla Energy’s beginnings would herald its quiet growth, with the company later announcing products like the Solar Roof tile, which is yet to be ramped, and the successor to the Powerwall, the 13.5 kWh Powerwall 2. In recent years, Tesla Energy also launched its Powerwall 3 home battery and the massive Megapack, a 3.9 MWh monster of a battery unit that has become the backbone for energy storage systems across the globe.
Key Milestones
As noted by Tesla Energy in its recent video, it has now established facilities that allow the company to manufacture 20,000 units of the Megapack every year, which should help grow the 23 GWh worth of Megapacks that have already been deployed globally.
The Powerwall remains a desirable home battery as well, with more than 850,000 units installed worldwide. These translate to 12 GWh of residential entry storage delivered to date. Just like the Megapack, Tesla is also ramping its production of the Powerwall, allowing the division to grow even more.
Tesla Energy’s Role
While Tesla Energy does not catch as much headlines as the company’s electric vehicle businesses, its contributions to the company’s bottom line have been growing. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, Tesla Energy deployed 10.4 GWh of energy storage products. Powerwall deployments also crossed 1 GWh in one quarter for the first time. As per Tesla in its Q1 2025 Update Letter, the gross margin for the Energy division has improved sequentially as well.
Tesla Energy shined in what was a weak delivery report for the first quarter, as the company’s frequently-forgotten battery storage products performed extraordinarily well.
Tesla reported its Q1 production, delivery, and deployment figures for the first quarter of the year, and while many were less-than-excited about the automotive side, the Energy division performed well with 10.4 GWh of energy storage products deployed during the first quarter.
This was a 156 percent increase year-over-year and the company’s second-best quarter in terms of energy deployments to date. Only Q4 2024 was better, as 11 GWh was recorded.
Tesla Energy is frequently forgotten and not talked about enough. The company has continued to deploy massive energy storage projects across the globe, and as it recorded 31.5 GWh of deployments last year, 2025 is already looking as if it will be a record-setting year if it continues at this pace.
Tesla Megapacks to back one of Europe’s largest energy storage sites
Although Energy performed well, many investors are privy to that of the automotive division’s performance, which is where some concern lies. Tesla had a weak quarter for deliveries, missing Wall Street estimates by a considerable margin.
There are two very likely reasons as to why this happened: the first is Tesla’s switchover to the new Model Y at its production facilities across the globe. Tesla said it lost “several weeks” of production due to the updating of manufacturing lines as it rolled out a new version of its all-electric crossover.
Secondly, Tesla could be facing some pressure from pushback against the brand, which is what many analysts will say. Despite the publicity of attacks on Tesla drivers and their vehicles, as well as the company’s showrooms, it would be safe to assume that we will have a better picture painted of what the issue is in Q2 after the company reports numbers in July.
If Tesla is still struggling with lackluster delivery figures in Q2 after the Model Y is ramped and deliveries are more predictable and consistent, we could see where the argument for brand damage is legitimate. However, we are more prone to believe the Model Y, which accounts for most of Tesla’s sales, and its production ramp is likely the cause for what happened in Q1.
In what was a relatively bleak quarter, Tesla Energy still shines as the bright spot for the quarter.
USDOT Secretary visits Tesla Giga Texas, hints at national autonomous vehicle standards
Tesla posts Optimus’ most impressive video demonstration yet
Starship Flight 9 nears as SpaceX’s Starbase becomes a Texan City
-
News2 weeks agoTesla Cybertruck Range Extender gets canceled
-
Elon Musk6 days agoTesla seems to have fixed one of Full Self-Driving’s most annoying features
-
Lifestyle2 weeks agoAnti-Elon Musk group crushes Tesla Model 3 with Sherman tank–with unexpected results
-
News2 weeks agoStarlink to launch on United Airlines planes by May 15
-
News2 weeks agoTesla Semi gets new adoptee in latest sighting
-
News2 weeks agoTesla launches its most inexpensive trim of new Model Y
-
News2 weeks agoUS’ base Tesla Model Y has an edge vs Shanghai and Berlin’s entry-level Model Ys
-
News2 weeks agoTesla Cybertruck owners get amazing year-long freebie