News
Elon Musk acknowledges investor’s concerns on how politics made Tesla a divisive brand
Anyone who has been following the Tesla story for the past decade or so would know two things about Elon Musk: He is very headstrong and always punches back. But if a recent interaction on social media platform X is any indication, it would appear that Elon Musk is seeing just how divisive he has become, and he seems to be taking the concerns of his investors and customers to heart — at least to a point.
Elon Musk thrives in conflict, and for the most part, he has been in the middle of one battle after another over the past couple of decades. Whether it was the financial crisis that threatened to kill Tesla and SpaceX in 2008 to the intense short seller attacks that loomed over Tesla during the Model 3’s days of “production hell,” Elon Musk has always placed himself on the front line. This remains true today, though a look at Musk’s X account shows that he has become more active politically.
Musk’s foray into politics has divided his followers online, and his support for more conservative voices has led to Tesla’s reputation among more liberal customers taking a significant hit. This was highlighted by longtime Tesla retail investor Galileo Russell, who addressed the matter in a post on X. As per Russell, Musk’s more evident political stance is understandable considering the current administration’s unfair treatment of Tesla and other Musk ventures, but his tendency to punch back has resulted in the CEO practically being painted as public enemy number one.
i really didn't want to post this. but felt it is important feedback for Elon & needed to be candid
all coming from a place of love and wanting everyone to be on the same page and move forward with a stronger America ??❤️— Gali (@Gfilche) July 30, 2024
“There is no doubt material damage has been done to the Tesla brand. Every time I step into my car, it used to be about fun, positivity, and sustainability. Now (at least in every major US city), my car has become a political statement that is divisive. That sucks. It’s like a cloud that follows my car everywhere I go. I’m worried this trend is and will continue to seriously hurt Tesla’s sales and brand,” the Tesla investor wrote.
Russell is not the first Tesla investor that has addressed concerns about Musk’s politics on X. And considering Musk’s stubborn nature, even longtime Tesla supporters have pretty much resigned themselves to seeing a progressively more political Musk. Quite surprisingly, however, Musk posted a short comment on the Tesla investor’s post, and instead of explaining why he has become more political, the CEO simply stated “I hear you.”
thanks for listening ?— Gali (@Gfilche) July 30, 2024
The Tesla investor’s observations are pretty much on point. A look at the Tesla community today would show a growing number of EV owners being disillusioned with their Teslas due to Musk’s behavior (there’s a reason why “I Bought This Before We Knew Elon Was Crazy” stickers could be seen in Teslas). Even some news coverage of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro’s comments about Musk being an “arch-enemy” of the country had some anti-Musk slant, with some reports taking the angle that the CEO was picking a fight with a world leader.
Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
