News
Elon Musk’s Boring Company announces tunnel site tours for LA County students
As the Boring Company prepares to break ground for its Chicago-O’Hare high-speed transport project, the Elon Musk-founded startup announced that it would be offering tours of its tunnel site in Hawthorne, CA, to students in LA County. The tours, which could accommodate up to 30 students at a time, could be booked by contacting the Boring Company through email.
The Boring Company’s announcement of the tunnel tours was posted on the company’s official Twitter page on Tuesday. The tunneling startup noted that tours could be booked by interested faculty, or students with a faculty sponsor.
We are hosting student tours of the Hawthorne tunnel site for schools in LA County! Each tour can accommodate up to 30 students. Interested faculty (or students with a faculty sponsor!) can reach out to studenttours@boringcompany.com
— The Boring Company (@boringcompany) August 14, 2018
Offering tours for students is a clever way for the Boring Company to introduce its underground transportation concept to a new generation of commuters. The Boring Company’s high-speed tunnels, after all, have been met with reservations from parties not comfortable with the startup’s ideas. Such reservations became prevalent back in January, when the Boring Company’s representatives presented the tunneling startup’s plans to members of the Culver City local government. Some officials, such as city council member Meghan Sahli-Wells, noted during the presentation that while the company’s tunnels were compelling, the idea was “half-baked from a public perspective.”
The Boring Company’s 2.7-mile Hawthorne project has been progressing well over the past few months. Back in May, Elon Musk posted an update on his personal Instagram page announcing that the test tunnel was nearly complete, and that the project was just pending final regulatory approvals. As soon as these are complete, Musk stated that the Boring Company would start offering “free demo rides” to the public. The tunneling startup showed more signs that the Hawthorne tunnel was nearing completion last month as well, at one point showcasing a section of the tunnel fitted with multicolored lighting.
The 2.7-mile Hawthorne tunnel is a portion of the company’s 6.5-mile proof-of-concept tunnel for the LA area, which is planned to run from northeast Westchester to Brentwood, one of the most traffic-congested sections in West Los Angeles. Ultimately, the Boring Company appears to be setting the stage for its proof-of-concept tunnel, as evidenced by a recent purchase of land in West LA, which would likely become a Loop station in the future. Loop stations are small landing zones and exits where passengers can access the Boring Company’s underground tunnel system.
Traveling through the Boring Company’s tunnels would be done through the use of electric-powered pods that can hold up to 16 passengers at a time. The all-electric pods are set to be manufactured by Tesla, and are capable of reaching speeds of up to 150 mph, thanks to a design that uses eight wheels fitted on the sides of the vehicle. According to the Boring Company, the Loop system, at least in its initial run, would prioritize commuters who do not have their own vehicles.
The Boring Company might be a tunneling startup seemingly founded by Elon Musk on a whim, but the company has grown significantly since it was founded back in December 2016. Earlier this year, an SEC filing revealed that the Boring Company raised $113 million in a funding round, $100 million of which was invested by Musk himself. After winning the bid for the estimated ~$1 billion downtown Chicago-O’Hare project, Berenberg analyst Alexander Haissl also noted that the tunneling startup could be worth as much as $16 billion in the future.
Elon Musk
Tesla’s Elon Musk: 10 billion miles needed for safe Unsupervised FSD
As per the CEO, roughly 10 billion miles of training data are required due to reality’s “super long tail of complexity.”
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has provided an updated estimate for the training data needed to achieve truly safe unsupervised Full Self-Driving (FSD).
As per the CEO, roughly 10 billion miles of training data are required due to reality’s “super long tail of complexity.”
10 billion miles of training data
Musk comment came as a reply to Apple and Rivian alum Paul Beisel, who posted an analysis on X about the gap between tech demonstrations and real-world products. In his post, Beisel highlighted Tesla’s data-driven lead in autonomy, and he also argued that it would not be easy for rivals to become a legitimate competitor to FSD quickly.
“The notion that someone can ‘catch up’ to this problem primarily through simulation and limited on-road exposure strikes me as deeply naive. This is not a demo problem. It is a scale, data, and iteration problem— and Tesla is already far, far down that road while others are just getting started,” Beisel wrote.
Musk responded to Beisel’s post, stating that “Roughly 10 billion miles of training data is needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving. Reality has a super long tail of complexity.” This is quite interesting considering that in his Master Plan Part Deux, Elon Musk estimated that worldwide regulatory approval for autonomous driving would require around 6 billion miles.
FSD’s total training miles
As 2025 came to a close, Tesla community members observed that FSD was already nearing 7 billion miles driven, with over 2.5 billion miles being from inner city roads. The 7-billion-mile mark was passed just a few days later. This suggests that Tesla is likely the company today with the most training data for its autonomous driving program.
The difficulties of achieving autonomy were referenced by Elon Musk recently, when he commented on Nvidia’s Alpamayo program. As per Musk, “they will find that it’s easy to get to 99% and then super hard to solve the long tail of the distribution.” These sentiments were echoed by Tesla VP for AI software Ashok Elluswamy, who also noted on X that “the long tail is sooo long, that most people can’t grasp it.”
News
Tesla earns top honors at MotorTrend’s SDV Innovator Awards
MotorTrend’s SDV Awards were presented during CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
Tesla emerged as one of the most recognized automakers at MotorTrend’s 2026 Software-Defined Vehicle (SDV) Innovator Awards.
As could be seen in a press release from the publication, two key Tesla employees were honored for their work on AI, autonomy, and vehicle software. MotorTrend’s SDV Awards were presented during CES 2026 in Las Vegas.
Tesla leaders and engineers recognized
The fourth annual SDV Innovator Awards celebrate pioneers and experts who are pushing the automotive industry deeper into software-driven development. Among the most notable honorees for this year was Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s Vice President of AI Software, who received a Pioneer Award for his role in advancing artificial intelligence and autonomy across the company’s vehicle lineup.
Tesla also secured recognition in the Expert category, with Lawson Fulton, a staff Autopilot machine learning engineer, honored for his contributions to Tesla’s driver-assistance and autonomous systems.
Tesla’s software-first strategy
While automakers like General Motors, Ford, and Rivian also received recognition, Tesla’s multiple awards stood out given the company’s outsized role in popularizing software-defined vehicles over the past decade. From frequent OTA updates to its data-driven approach to autonomy, Tesla has consistently treated vehicles as evolving software platforms rather than static products.
This has made Tesla’s vehicles very unique in their respective sectors, as they are arguably the only cars that objectively get better over time. This is especially true for vehicles that are loaded with the company’s Full Self-Driving system, which are getting progressively more intelligent and autonomous over time. The majority of Tesla’s updates to its vehicles are free as well, which is very much appreciated by customers worldwide.
Elon Musk
Judge clears path for Elon Musk’s OpenAI lawsuit to go before a jury
The decision maintains Musk’s claims that OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit structure violated early assurances made to him as a co-founder.
A U.S. judge has ruled that Elon Musk’s lawsuit accusing OpenAI of abandoning its founding nonprofit mission can proceed to a jury trial.
The decision maintains Musk’s claims that OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit structure violated early assurances made to him as a co-founder. These claims are directly opposed by OpenAI.
Judge says disputed facts warrant a trial
At a hearing in Oakland, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers stated that there was “plenty of evidence” suggesting that OpenAI leaders had promised that the organization’s original nonprofit structure would be maintained. She ruled that those disputed facts should be evaluated by a jury at a trial in March rather than decided by the court at this stage, as noted in a Reuters report.
Musk helped co-found OpenAI in 2015 but left the organization in 2018. In his lawsuit, he argued that he contributed roughly $38 million, or about 60% of OpenAI’s early funding, based on assurances that the company would remain a nonprofit dedicated to the public benefit. He is seeking unspecified monetary damages tied to what he describes as “ill-gotten gains.”
OpenAI, however, has repeatedly rejected Musk’s allegations. The company has stated that Musk’s claims were baseless and part of a pattern of harassment.
Rivalries and Microsoft ties
The case unfolds against the backdrop of intensifying competition in generative artificial intelligence. Musk now runs xAI, whose Grok chatbot competes directly with OpenAI’s flagship ChatGPT. OpenAI has argued that Musk is a frustrated commercial rival who is simply attempting to slow down a market leader.
The lawsuit also names Microsoft as a defendant, citing its multibillion-dollar partnerships with OpenAI. Microsoft has urged the court to dismiss the claims against it, arguing there is no evidence it aided or abetted any alleged misconduct. Lawyers for OpenAI have also pushed for the case to be thrown out, claiming that Musk failed to show sufficient factual basis for claims such as fraud and breach of contract.
Judge Gonzalez Rogers, however, declined to end the case at this stage, noting that a jury would also need to consider whether Musk filed the lawsuit within the applicable statute of limitations. Still, the dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI is now headed for a high-profile jury trial in the coming months.